This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the SouthCarolina Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism (SCDPR) challenging a lower courtruling that found the state had waived sovereign immunity by participating in a federal antitrust lawsuit against Google.
SouthCarolina is set to carry out the first execution by firing squad in 15 years. The US Supreme Court denies Friday the emergency petition to stay clears the way for the state to carry out the death penalty. The post SouthCarolina to carry out first firing squad execution in 15 years appeared first on JURIST - News.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Wednesday ruled that two SouthCarolina school disturbance laws cannot be used to prosecute students for disruptive behavior. ” This decision comes one year after a US district court struck down SouthCarolina’s school disturbance laws.
” The professor toured SouthCarolina plantations to find individuals who he believed were racially “pure” Africans to photograph and study in furtherance of his polygenism theory.
In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the courtruled that the Arizona Supreme Court incorrectly held that the 2016 case Lynch v. In Lynch, the US Supreme Court overruled the Arizona Supreme Court’s determination that the case Simmons v. SouthCarolina “did not apply” in Arizona.
“Panel rejects SouthCarolina bid to kick Planned Parenthood off Medicaid program; Planned Parenthood South Atlantic can stay on the Palmetto State’s list of approved Medicaid providers, a federal appeals courtruled”: Erika Williams of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that the U.S.
The state attorneys generals of Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and SouthCarolina alleged in a federal Missouri court that Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan is unauthorized and poses economic harm to working class individuals. According to the AP , the White House dismissed the lawsuit as baseless.
Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court declines appeal from Christian school fighting transgender housing (John Fritze, USA Today) U.S.
Although the ministerial exception might ultimately shield Faith Christian from liability, the courtruled, it does not protect the school against having to litigate Tucker’s lawsuit at all. Whether Tucker served as a minister is a difficult question for a jury to answer, the 10th Circuit explained. Alexander v.
Share In what was only the second opinion day of the 2022-23 term, the Supreme Court delivered a rare win for a criminally convicted petitioner and offered a clarifying example of when it is appropriate for a federal court to intervene when a state court fails to apply federal law. In a 5-4 decision in Cruz v.
The DPIC reports that only four states—Mississippi, Utah, SouthCarolina and Oklahoma—allow for execution by firing squad as an alternative method of execution. . Supreme Courtruled that a prisoner challenging an existing method of execution under the Eighth Amendment must propose a viable alternative method. .
SouthCarolina , the Supreme Court addressed this very issue. In Simmons , the court held that in capital trials, when the state puts defendants’ future dangerousness at issue, defendants have a constitutional right to inform the jury that they will be ineligible for parole if spared execution.
In March 2021, Servotronics filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Fourth Circuit, seeking an order directing the lower court to proceed, given that the Fourth Circuit’s mandate had been favorable to Servotronics. A district court has to obey the mandate of the appellate court unless it is stayed. Interesting times!
The SouthCarolina Supreme Courtruled on Tuesday that the University of SouthCarolina (USC) has the right to require students to wear masks on campus to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and the requirement is effective immediately. The Supreme Court took up the appeal on an emergency basis.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain courtrules on retirement.”. For reference, the SouthCarolina Bar Association provides an example of a letter to a client informing them of an attorney’s retirement. .
The SouthCarolina Supreme Courtruled on Thursday that the state’s constitutional privacy protections also apply to abortion, Kate Zernike reports for the New York Times. “The decision to terminate a pregnancy rests upon the utmost personal and private considerations imaginable,” the courtruled.
A SouthCarolina judge Tuesday declined to overturn the state’s Fetal Heartbeat Law , which bans abortions after six weeks. The judge also granted the state’s request to send the case directly to the SouthCarolina Supreme Court. The challenge will now head to the state Supreme Court.
“SouthCarolina Constitution Includes Abortion Right, State Supreme CourtRules; The decision overturns the state’s six-week ban on abortion, a major victory for abortion rights in the South, where the procedure is strictly limited”: Kate Zernike of The New York Times has this report.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic joined two physicians and Greenville Women’s Clinic to file a petition Thursday asking the Supreme Court of SouthCarolina to reconsider its decision to uphold a strict state law banning abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
“SC’s 6-week abortion ban is unconstitutional, state Supreme Courtrules”: Maayan Schechter and Zak Koeske of The State of Columbia, SouthCarolina have this report. And Seanna Adcox of The Post and Courier of Columbia, SouthCarolina reports that “ SC Supreme Court tosses out 6-week abortion ban.”
“SC Supreme Courtrules state’s contested 6-week abortion ban is constitutional, can go into effect”: Joseph Bustos of The State of Columbia, SouthCarolina has this report. ” You can access today’s 4-to-1 ruling of the Supreme Court of SouthCarolina at this link. .”
“After SC Supreme Courtruling, new attempt to ban nearly all abortions advances in Legislature”: Seanna Adcox of The Post and Courier of Charleston, SouthCarolina has this report.
Another same-sex First Amendment case will be before the Supreme Court soon. SouthCarolina appeals court upholds lower courtruling that basically says, "You can't just overrule Roe, dude." The US Interior after doing quick Google searches of monument names, probably. [ The Guardian ]. Sun Herald ].
The Florida Supreme Courtruled on Monday that the state constitution does not protect the right to abortion. The ruling in Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida vs. State of Florida allows the current 15-week abortion ban to be upheld and triggers the Heartbeat Protection Act to take effect. Wade in 2022.
Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and SouthCarolina sued President Joe Biden, asserting the plan poses a threat of imminent harm in the form of lost tax revenue, is an unlawful regulatory action and that Biden lacks authority to implement the plan.
Several of the courts conservative justices expressed skepticism about the map and about whether the 2022 ruling on which Louisiana relied to justify the creation of a second majority-Black district in the state was actually correct, but it was unclear whether those concerns would be enough to uphold the lower courtsruling.
Nebraska and SouthCarolina now stand out as particular circumstances in which states are still wielding capital punishment — but without the lethal injection drugs. . SouthCarolina’s Firing Squad. So, it appears states have begun doing just that. .
SouthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP , released on Thursday, which concluded race did not impermissibly exclude Black voters. SouthCarolina District 1 was redrawn following the previous census. ” This District Courtruling was the center of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Wednesday rejected the Biden Administration’s attempt to stay a lower courtruling which found President Joe Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan unlawful. The Supreme Court has yet to respond. .
In Nebraska , the States of Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and SouthCarolina claimed the plan would deprive them of their tax revenue. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of Article III standing, stating they could independently alter their tax policies.
The courtruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” particularly those with ravenous monkeys. Charges pending.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a ruling by a federal district court holding that a congressional district on the SouthCarolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander – that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
But the lower courtsruled, and the federal government contends, that the “safety value” is only available to defendants who do not have any of the indicators. Raiders Retreat counters that in 1955, the Supreme Court made clear that state law applies to maritime insurance disputes unless there is an established federal admiralty rule.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a case that, at first glance, appears to involve only a technical interpretation of the federal Medicaid Act. Edwards and Planned Parenthood went to federal court in SouthCarolina. The Supreme Court, it says, has made clear that this is a stringent test.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a dispute over the congressional map that SouthCarolina’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted in the wake of the 2020 census. Background In 2021, the SouthCarolina legislature adopted a new map for the state’s seven seats in the U.S.
The resulting litigation could leave core election rules in doubt heading into the next round of elections. It seeks to negate the Supreme Courtruling in Shelby County v. When the Constitution was written, the Framers expressly warned of the need to keep the federal government at bay in elections. 4) is equally comprehensive.
Either or both cases could return to the Supreme Court once the federal appeals courtsrule on the merits of the dispute. Nebraska , a divided courtruled that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority when it announced the debt relief program, which relied on the HEROES Act, a law passed in the wake of the Sept.
Black churches feeling like they are going to get shot up, like at a Bible study that’s happened in SouthCarolina. Ohio , the Supreme Courtruled in 1969 that even calling for violence is protected under the First Amendment unless there is a threat of “ imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to send their challenge to Texas’ restrictive anti-abortion law back to U.S. 10, the Supreme Courtruled that the providers’ lawsuit can go forward against a group of state medical licensing officials. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Lynch v. The law, S.B.
Tim Scott of SouthCarolina proposed the JUSTICE (Just and Unifying Solutions to Invigorate Communities Everywhere) Act, which includes reforming police hiring practices and funding training that would end the practice of chokeholds. The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act from Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif.,
SouthCarolina Conference of the NAACP to their merits calendar for the 2023-24 term as well as three other cases, including a dispute arising from former President Donald Trump’s lease of a government-owned building in Washington, D.C., The justices added Alexander v. and two cases involving the Armed Career Criminal Act.
SouthCarolina Conference of the NAACP , a court divided on ideological lines threw out a federal district court’sruling finding that a congressional district on the SouthCarolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander – that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content