This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Federal: Federal CourtRules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. For more on DAOs in Wyoming, visit the Secretary of State’s FAQ page on the topic. To learn more about HB 318, please go here.
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt.
Switzer , the Supreme Courtruled that state prisoners could pursue post-conviction claims for DNA testing of crime-scene evidence in a federal civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s rejection in Rodriguez v. In Skinner v. 1983 if they have unsuccessfully sought testing under state procedures.
The two doctors at the center of the Supreme Court case (who are currently serving sentences of more than 20 years) are both awaiting lower-courtrulings on whether they are now entitled to new trials themselves. The post The <em>other</em> Supreme Courtruling with big repercussions for U.S.
The plaintiffs are a group of Republican-led states, including Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia and Wyoming. the court concluded that the states did not have standing to challenge the order because their injuries flow from “potential future regulations.”
As Compliance Date for Methane Waste Rule Nears, California Federal CourtRuled That BLM Could Not Postpone Compliance, Oil and Gas Trade Groups Again Asked Wyoming Federal Court for Preliminary Injunction. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.
Montana and Wyoming Asked Supreme Court to Consider Claims That Washington Impermissibly Blocked Access for Coal Shipments. Montana and Wyoming filed a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint in the U.S. Swiss CourtRuled that Imminent Danger of Climate Crisis Justified Protesters’ Actions. BP p.l.c. ,
California Federal Court Barred BLM from Enforcing Delay of Oil and Natural Gas Waste Prevention Rule; States, Trade Groups Asked WyomingCourt to Expedite Review of Rule and Suspend Deadlines. 22, 2018); Wyoming v. Trump , No. 1:17 -cv-00253 (D.D.C. California v. Bureau of Land Management , No.
The court, which did not address the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding alleged inadequacies in the climate change-related analyses, found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that they would suffer irreparable harm. Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. Army Corps of Engineers , No. Bernhardt , No.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
Grimm , leaves in place a lower-courtruling that found that a Virginia school district violated federal law when it barred students from using the restrooms that align with their gender identities. And in the second case, Montana and Wyoming v. Transgender students and school bathrooms.
On March 1, the federal defendants filed their opposition to the motion to stay the mandate, arguing that the Supreme Court was unlikely to grant the petition, “much less reverse this Court’s judgment,” because the Ninth Circuit had applied settled precedent. The federal district court for the District of Montana denied the U.S.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The cases were filed in 2016 , 2020 , and 2021.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content