This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A German court Tuesday rejected a lawsuit filed by environmental group Deutsche Umwelthilfe intended to bar Mercedes-Benz from selling cars with combustion engines that emit greenhouse gases after 2030. ” The organization believes that “[o]nly higher courts will clarify this fundamental question.”
The US Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit blocked an appeal Friday from Texas gun owners and state Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking judicial approval of a Texas gun law that exempts the state from federal firearm silencer regulations. Standing is a doctrine that courts require for an individual’s grievance to be heard.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a North Carolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
The Federal Court of Canada delivered a decision on Thursday overturning the federal government’s order to list plastic-manufactured items (PMIs) under Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA). One of the bill’s changes was to repeal and replace Schedule 1 of the CEPA with PMIs included.
Gaulkin & Esther Petrikovsky Last week, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in FDA v. To the manufacturers chagrin, FDA squarely rejected approximately 1.2 See our prior post on the Fifth Circuits decision here ). By Andrew J. Hull & David B. Clissold & Sophia R. 23-1038 (Apr.
The Supreme Court of Korea found on Thursday that shipbuilder Hitachi Zosen Corp. and heavy equipment manufacturer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries owe 50 million won (approx. The court’s Thursday ruling upheld two lower courtdecisions. The same court then found the same for Mitsubishi Heavy in June 2019.
Last week, building electrification secured an important victory in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This blog post discusses Local Law 154, unpacks Judge Abrams decision, and ends with a refresher on California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley ( Berkeley ).
Kirschenbaum — Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from imposing conditions on the distribution of discounted drugs to covered entities in the program. By Sophia R. Gaulkin & Alan M.
Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether Mexican government may continue its lawsuit against U.S. gun manufacturers. Estados Unidos Mexicanos , alleges the manufacturers aided and abetted the illegal sales of guns to traffickers for cartels in Mexico. gun manufacturers and one gun distributor. In appealing to the U.S.
Chip manufacturer Nvidia Corp. Supreme Court victory over investors who accuse the company of downplaying its reliance on the crypto mining market, arguing that a lower courtdecision allowing the case to move forward "eviscerates the guardrails that Congress erected to protect the public from abusive securities litigation."
Koblitz — You know a courtdecision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. Let’s just say, the smackdown—er, decision—eviscerates FDA’s approach to regulating flavored e-cigarettes. By David B. Clissold & Sara W.
The case involves a dispute between Jack Daniel’s (the largest American whiskey manufacturer) and VIP Products (the second-largest American dog toy manufacturer). 7 Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” manufactured by “Jack Daniel’s,” the toy refers to a “Bad Spaniel” that makes “Old No. 2 on your Tennessee carpet.”
Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. But the courts have taken the general provision and given it substantial meaning beyond the text.
Having received guidance from the Texas Supreme Court that Amazon cannot be held liable for third-party products that are shipped and fulfilled by Amazon, but not manufactured by the company under its brand, the Fifth Circuit on Tuesday reversed a lower court'sdecision that Amazon is a "seller" under the state's law.
The Supreme Court has not yet granted writ of certiorari in any patent cases this term. Rather, any new grant this term will very likely be pushed back to the October 2022 Term for hearing and decision. Still, there are a number of important patent cases pending before the court. by Dennis Crouch. Lets talk them through.
A San Francisco federal judge mulling tracking device manufacturer Tile Inc.'s s bid to arbitrate some claims that its Bluetooth trackers are dangerous because they empower stalkers asked the parties at a hearing Tuesday to brief her on the effect of a recent California appellate courtdecision regarding arbitrability.
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’sdecision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’sdecision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C
Kirschenbaum — In November 2020, we blogged about a decision by the Federal District Court of Maryland dismissing a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam suit alleging that Forest Laboratories knowingly reported inflated best prices under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), resulting in underpayment of rebates. of America v.
student, Galatasaray University, Turkey A Maltese court has refused to enforce a $740 million default judgment issued by the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (Palm Beach County) in a defamation suit brought by Applicant Mehmet Tatlici against his half-brother, Defendant Ugur Tatlici. [1] Ugur Tatlici , Case No. 9] Defendant U?
Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP , the court denied the motion to compel the arbitrations proceeding under federal equitable estoppel law. According to the facts, the brothers Balkrishna and Nagaraj Setty signed an agreement for partnership where they became the joint owner of the incense manufacturing company.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Brown v. Nexus Business Solutions, LLC affirmed a district court'sdecision that business development managers who solicited and sold General Motors. On April 1, 2022, the U.S.
by Dennis Crouch I was rereading the Supreme Court’s recent enablement decision of Amgen Inc. 594 (2023) and was struck by the Supreme Court’s statement that its 19th Century decision of Wood v. ” The Lower CourtDecision In 1842, Wood sued William Underhill and Aschel Gerow for infringement.
Supreme Court 2021). The Supreme Court’s doctrine in Graham v. Of course, in deciding Graham , the Supreme Court wrote that the new Section 103 ““was intended to codify judicial precedents” such as ” Hotchkiss v. by Dennis Crouch. Amarin Pharma, Inc., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. John Deere (1966) and KSR v.
Gaulkin — On April 10, the Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed a summary judgment ruling for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding the agency’s definitions of “line-extension drug” and “new formulation” for purposes of determining rebates that drug manufacturers may owe the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP).
The 340B program, authorized under Section 340B of the Public Health Services Act and administered by HRSA, imposes a ceiling price on pharmaceutical manufacturer sales to “covered entities,” which are certain health clinics that receive federal funding and certain types of safety net hospitals to provide them drugs at lower prices.
The collaborative idea was that Eddings would manufacture the sheaths because Junker did not have that capability. The district court says sided with the patentee and a jury awarded $1.2 Thus, the court has held that an offer-to-manufacture doesn’t count. Section 102(b).
The 2017 Supreme Courtdecision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. This argument was quickly rejected by the court. (2) Thus, the district court properly dismissed the claims against Mylan N.V. Celgene Corp. Mylan Pharma ( Fed. and therefore venue in that state is improper.
In 2019, we blogged that the District Court found for the plaintiffs, holding that CMS did not have the statutory authority to make such a change without first conducting a hospital acquisition cost survey data. The District Court opinion was subsequently reversed by the D.C. See 42 U.S.C. Becerra, No. 20-1114, 596 U. S. _ (2022).
by Dennis Crouch A decade ago, the US Supreme Court issued a pair of decisions that upended substantial aspects of patent practice. In court, these cases are often decided at pleading-stage, before any evidence is introduced or considered. Mayo Collaborative Servs. Prometheus Labs., 66 (2012); and Alice Corp. 208 (2014).
We have blogged recently about several FDA setbacks in court ( here , for example). Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday. FDA , the Court of Appeals ruled that FDA cannot regulate a medical product – in this case, the radiographic contrast agent barium sulfate – as a drug when the product meets the definition of a device.
Historically, voting on executive compensation packages has been a pro forma exercise at the annual meetings of technology manufacturer 3M Co., A January courtdecision necessitated a new vote on Musk’s compensation, which has left Tesla insiders lobbying major investors and proxy advisers to give the plan a thumbs up.
Claud & Faraz Siddiqui — As we move into the heat of the summer, we can look forward to the annual June deluge of opinions coming from the Supreme Court. In this case, the Supreme Court provided greater clarity on how to interpret that requirement. The Supreme CourtDecision The unanimous Supreme Court was having none of it.
Circuit Court of Appeals described in a recent opinion as an “aggressive timeline for industry compliance.” Within two days of the final rule, the Window Covering Manufacturers Association filed suit at the D.C. The court heard the case on an expedited basis and, last week, vacated the final rule. See 15 U.S.C.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Biden-era rule regulating so-called ghost guns untraceable weapons without serial numbers, assembled from components or kits that can be bought online. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the courtsdecision, complaining that it had agreed to rewrite statutory text.
Sanofi : In its unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court affirmed that Amgen’s broad functional claim was invalid having failed the requirements that claims must be enabled to their full scope, allowing for “a reasonable amount of experimentation.” Background on Amgen v. ” Amgen. Hyde , 242 U.S. 261 (1916). 2d 731 (Fed.
A regulatory consultant on the panel made a recommendation to FDA that it lean more heavily on Remote Interactive Evaluations (“REIs”) to help alleviate its backlog—of which HPM recently learned the Agency had only conducted 10 in the last 30 months for purposes of drug manufacturing compliance.
In its decision , the court offered two alternative justifications for siding with the patentee, which I’ll discuss in reverse order: No Patricide : First, the court held that the ‘271 patent does not qualify as a proper OTDP reference against the earlier-filed and earlier-issued ‘740 patent. 3d 1208 (Fed.
Important to note here is that each interchangeable biosimilar was first approved as a biosimilar and each biosimilar manufacturer had been sued under the so-called “patent dance” procedure prior to seeking licensure of the biosimilar products as interchangeable.
Teva has traditionally been a generic manufacturer, but in this case sued Eli Lilly for infringing its patents covering methods of treating headache disorders like migraine using humanized antibodies that bind to and antagonize calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a protein associated with migraine pain. Lilly for a few years.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district courtdecision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. Climate Litigation Chart (Update #92): FEATURED CASE.
This tit-for-tat directive against Texas SB8 is the latest of the bold moves Newsom has taken and responds directly to the Supreme Courtdecision last week. SB8, signed by Texas Governor Greg Abbott in May, bans abortion when an ultrasound can detect a “heartbeat,” which is often before a woman even knows she is pregnant.
A Second Circuit decision vacated two lower court rulings which allowed healthcare workers to claim religious exemptions to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument next week in a challenge to a 2022 federal rule that seeks to regulate “ghost guns” – firearms without serial numbers that, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives says, almost anyone can quickly assemble with parts that they purchase, often in a kit online or through the mail.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The court denied cert on Monday. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, filed an opinion dissenting from the court’s denial of summary vacatur.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content