article thumbnail

US appeals court rules Minnesota handgun possession age restrictions unconstitutional

JURIST

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Tuesday that a Minnesota law requiring handgun carry permit applicants to be at least 21 years of age is unconstitutional. Regarding US history, the court rejected the state’s argument that 18 to 20-year-olds were denied the right to bear arms under common law.

article thumbnail

Ecuador court rules that river in capital has rights

JURIST

A court in Quito, Ecuador ruled that the Machángara River, which runs through the city, possesses rights making the municipal government of Quito responsible for pollution that occurs, a local civic advocacy group reported on Friday. The court also stated that Quito is obliged to work with civil society to carry out recovery efforts.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules unanimous jury required for sentence enhancement under Armed Career Criminal Act

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled on Friday that a unanimous jury is required to apply a recidivism punishment under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. The court held that a jury must unanimously find that the qualifying convictions were from separate occurrences for the mandatory minimum to apply.

article thumbnail

UK Supreme Court rules oil well development unlawful

JURIST

The UK Supreme Court held Thursday that Surrey’s planning authorities acted unlawfully when granting planning permission for an oil well development in 2019. The court ruled that the authorities should have considered certain environmental impacts when making the decision.

article thumbnail

ECOWAS court rules Nigeria violated human rights during October 2020 protests

JURIST

The Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) ruled on Wednesday that Nigeria violated the provisions of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) in its response to the protests that took place in October 2020, according to a statement published by the court.

article thumbnail

Canada Supreme Court rules IP address privacy warrants constitutional protection

JURIST

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled 5-4 on Friday that Canada’s Constitution protects Canadians’ internet protocol (IP) addresses from unreasonable search. In 2018, the European Court of Justice was similarly tasked with considering whether IP addresses constitute personal data in Benedik v Slovenia.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules First Amendment retaliatory arrest claims permissible despite probable cause

JURIST

The US Supreme Court held Thursday in Gonzalez v. The Supreme Court found that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously applied these principles. Following this ruling, Gonzales can pursue her claim of retaliation against the county.