This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Judge Thomas Parker, a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Friday ruled that Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA) is unconstitutional. In his opinion, Parker ruled that the AEA violates First Amendment rights. He stated that free speech does not extend to just words.
The Supreme Court of India dismissed on Friday applications seeking to extend 11 convicts’ time to surrender to jail authorities in the Bilkis Bano case. The court had agreed to entertain these applications on Thursday, which were mentioned before Nagarathna. 3 [one of the convicts] herein had sought before this Court.
The Supreme Court today approved a new policy for how it treats files submitted by a Governor when asking the court to recommend clemency. Last November, the court proposed the policy, and solicited public comments about it. See rule 8.45 Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th Code, section 4852 ).
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. The matter will now go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which has proven amiable to limits on the Second Amendment. It did not take long. Instead, Gov.
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee set the path for the six-justice majority of the Supreme Court to reject challenges to two Arizona laws. And it is the latest in a string of cases pushing the federal courts out of second-guessing state election laws.
District Judge Renée Marie Bumb has placed a temporary block on parts of New Jersey’s gun law meant to limit the number of places individuals can carry weapons after last year’s Supreme Courtruling expanding gun rights, Daniel Han reports for Politico.
The Supreme Court today agreed to answer this question posed by the Ninth Circuit in Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. The court has shown no interest in COVID insurance issues when they arise in state court litigation. of California’s Supreme Court, part 2
Antitrust law took center stage this week as college general counsel try to figure out the what and how of paying student athletes under a new courtruling, and the U.S. Department of Justice is trying to break up the entertainment venue dominance of Live Nation and Ticketmaster.
A pivotal development in this arena occurred in 2021 when the Delhi High Court rendered a judgement in the case of HK Media Limited and Anr v. Simultaneously, the defendants filed a suit in the United States District Court, asserting non-infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. Brainlink International Inc., [1]
Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Courtruled in Lucia v.
A court denied Netflix’s request for GoTV Streaming to supply documents relating to the source of its patent litigation funding. Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri discuss this dispute on this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel. Read more about this case here.
Weintraub Tobin’s Intellectual Property podcast, The Briefing , published nearly 50 episodes this year covering a variety of IP issues relating to trademark, copyright, and entertainment law. Supreme Courtruled in Andy Warhol Foundation v. As we look back, we want to share The Briefing’s most popular episodes in 2023.
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a lawsuit brought by the city of Baltimore against companies that produce fossil fuels, seeking to hold them responsible for their role in global warming. The case now before the Supreme Court, BP PLC v. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Background.
Objections, Delaware Chancery Courtrulings and the stock market have deeply eroded what was once expected to be a $20 million stockholder class attorney fee awarded to counsel for AMC Entertainment Inc. stockholders who recently battled the company to compromise on a dilutive share conversion plan.
14] Since Ticketmaster’s 2010 merger with Live Nation Entertainment, it has faced criticism about its size, power in the entertainment industry, and how it displays the characteristics of a monopoly. [15] 20] When the case was brought by Tickets.com, Ticketmaster and Live Nation Entertainment had not yet merged. [21]
Supreme Courtruled Thursday that Andy Warhol’s portraits of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. The decision affirms a previous ruling by the Second Circuit, which found that Warhol’s artwork shared the same commercial purpose as the original photograph taken by photographer Lynn Goldsmith.
New York Democrats have passed a series of laws that led to catastrophic losses in federal court, including the recent major ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. It passed with the help of a special session in the resumption of this inexorable cycle and has already resulted in court losses.
Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The courtruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts.
Supreme Courtruled in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith that Andy Warhol’s portrait of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. Scott Hervey and Tara Sattler talk about this decision on this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel here.
Judge Alan Albright’s court in the Western District of Texas is rapidly becoming the latest hot spot for patent litigation. The public debate in patent law has often focused on whether courts and juries are getting patent damages right. Moreover, individual courtrules are now requiring greater transparency. Dupont (E.D.
That’s because it is assumed that the use of this device is to keep the employees entertained. But they can have only one such device. Under this exception, the source of the content is not an issue. But it allows for the use of only a single radio or TV. A newer exception adopted in the 1990s goes further.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain courtrules on retirement.”. Review Active Cases and Address Pending Court Dates. When Do Lawyers Retire? According to the U.S. is 65 for men and 63 for women.
The US Supreme Court Monday declined to review the Pennsylvania Supreme Courtruling that overturned entertainer Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction. Cosby appealed the decision, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned his conviction in June 2021.
Supreme Courtruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.” .
Yesterday’s Supreme Court conference dealt with an unusually large number of cases, even for the double conference that it was. The court granted review in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court , an employment retaliation case that was headed to arbitration until the defendant employer delayed paying fees to the arbitration provider.
As some Supreme Court podcasters have noted, Justice Stephen Breyer’s retirement announcement in late January pushed the so-called Maskgate controversy out of the spotlight. Perhaps the court has concluded that certain podcasters are in need of more fodder for their metaphors about the status of the court.
The Commission advised them if possible, to “educate yourself on the harm it may cause Seattle’s BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) in your pursuit of a free ticket to an event that is not expressly meant for you and your entertainment.” ” In 2014, the Courtruled 6-2 in Schuette v.
Share In what was only the second opinion day of the 2022-23 term, the Supreme Court delivered a rare win for a criminally convicted petitioner and offered a clarifying example of when it is appropriate for a federal court to intervene when a state court fails to apply federal law. Cruz then filed a second appeal in state court.
Now, after a major courtruling against the university , an arbitrator has awarded Negy all back pay and benefits from the time of his firing. To the contrary, the university issued a statement that indicated that it is undeterred by the adverse courtrulings. That is good news.
Share A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. A federal district court in Austin, Tex.,
Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. On November 12, 2020, the Kentucky Supreme Courtruled unanimously in favor of the authority of the governor to issue pandemic orders. In Beshear v.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over a challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access. After more than two hours of debate on Wednesday, it was not clear whether a majority of the justices were ready to uphold the lower courtsruling.
But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of
In February 2023, the Supreme Court of Kentucky declined a similar challenge to the abortion bans. There has been a heated debate around the right to abortion since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the courtruled there is no constitutional right to abortion. In Dobbs v.
Indeed, some in the media have chided the Justice Department for “pulling back” on such characterizations in court. It did not entertain the possibility that the violence was not an effort to overthrow the nation but, instead, a riot. The coverage of Del Rio reaffirmed that there is an official truth on Jan.
Share Just over two years ago, following the launch of ChatGPT, SCOTUSblog decided to test how accurate the much-hyped AI really was at least when it came to Supreme Court-related questions. On the question about original and appellate Supreme Court jurisdiction (Question #5), the AI no longer confuses the two as it once did.
A panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seemed to be channeling the lyrics of the musical Hamilton in noting that “Everything is legal in New Jersey.” The show would likely still be entertaining, but the context and the conversation would change. It’s a completely different show.
At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Courtruled on a robust 164 matters. The court granted review in EpicentRx, Inc. ” The Supreme Court has a similar forum selection case under review — Gerro v. The Supreme Court denied review in Brooks. Actions of note included: Forum selection.
(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) On Friday, the ACLU asked the Supreme Court if it actually trusted the Trump administration to follow the law and around 1 a.m. He did manage to get a dissent filed roughly 22 hours later and… the Court was right that it was not worth the wait. It is not clear that the Court had jurisdiction.
Share The Supreme Court issued orders on Monday morning from the justices’ private conference on Friday, April 23. The court added three new cases to its docket for arguments next fall, including a major new case (covered in this article ) on the scope of the Second Amendment right to carry a gun outside the home. In United States v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content