This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday in Dubin v. United States that in order to constitute aggravated identity theft, the use of a person’s identity must be at the “crux” of what makes the conduct criminal, reversing a lower court decision.
A UK High Courtruled Monday that a ban on puberty blockers issued in May 2024 in the UK was lawful. The claim failed on all three of its grounds, with the court concluding that the secondary legislation banning puberty blockers for under eighteens was in fact, lawful.
The UK High Court Wednesday held that the Home Office acted unlawfully in implementing the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS). However, the court said that the way the scheme operates is “unlawful.” The IMA therefore succeeded in their claim, as the court found the current state of the scheme “unlawful.”
The Courtruled in favor of all Plaintiffs and against the federal defendants. In the Courts words: The final rule contemplates expanding FDAs jurisdiction to cover laboratory-developed test services as medical devices under the FDCA. Laposata were represented by a team at Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.,
Since a 1976 Supreme Courtruling , incarcerated individuals are the only group of people in the United States to have a constitutional right to health care. But, who decides what is “reasonably adequate,” particularly when the healthcare system for patients in prison lacks uniform standards?
“What a Supreme CourtRuling on Roe v. Wade Would Mean for Women; If the court overturns Roe, it would represent the biggest shift in reproductive healthcare in 50 years”: Laura Kusisto, Liz Essley Whyte, and Jennifer Calfas of The Wall Street Journal have this report.
A Japanese court on Wednesday allowed a gender change to be legally recognized without the need for sterilization for the first time in the country’s history. The post Japan court approves gender recognition without sterilization for the first time appeared first on JURIST - News.
The post CourtRules Johnson & Johnson Can’t Throw Out Civil Liability Because Of ’Good Intentions’ appeared first on Above the Law. The next phase of the litigation will be them repeatedly saying, ’Cancer? How could we have given you cancer? Do you see how cute our mascot is?!’
The report highlights issues related to drug trafficking, insufficient healthcare services and the overall well-being of detainees and staff members. Furthermore, the report draws attention to the inadequate provision of healthcare services within the detention centre.
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Monday rejected an appeal from Pfizer Inc. A district court in New York upheld the DHHS’s interpretation of the AKS. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the district court’s decision.
She served as the Provincial Minister of Punjab for Primary & Secondary Healthcare and Specialized Healthcare & Medical Education between 2018 and 2023. Consequently, the PTI has filed a contempt of court petition in the Supreme Court in response to what they perceive as a lack of impartiality by the ECP.
The Delaware Supreme Courtruled on Monday that Cigna can’t seek a $1.85 billion breakup fee after its failed merger with Anthem, upholding a judge’s decision last year.
The General Court of the EU revoked on Wednesday the restrictive measures imposed on Mikhail Fridman and Petr Aven, two Russian billionaires, between February 2022 and March 2023. The courtruled that the provided reasons in the initial acts were insufficiently substantiated.
The India Supreme Court Monday declared that performing the “two-finger” or “three-finger” vaginal test on victims of rape or sexual assault will be classed as misconduct. The Supreme Court has condemned this test since the case of Lillu vs. State of Haryana in 2013. ” Despite this, the practice continued.
Supreme Court's most recent term — Loper Bright, Corner Post and Jarkesy — will likely strengthen healthcare organizations' ability to affirmatively sue executive agencies to challenge regulations governing operations and enforcement actions, say attorneys at McDermott. Three separate decisions from the U.S.
The Supreme Court of Korea dismissed an appeal on Thursday filed by doctors and medical professionals aiming to stop the South Korean government’s plan to increase the medical school admissions by up to 2,000 students next year, according to reports from local media.
And with that comes federal courts and travel. What I’m hearing from a compliance perspective is this would be similar to a paralegal role where you’re constantly looking up what’s the courtrule or how can we follow it to the letter? We did large medical malpractice cases. We sued pharmaceutical companies.
In 1976, the Supreme Courtruled in Estelle v. Additionally, much of prison healthcare is now privatized, and the profit-driven model is unsuited to a prison population — a development that’s resulted in the denial of lifesaving procedures. Some even have restricted or suspended medical licenses.
Plaintiff argued that the arbitration agreement was not enforceable because the POA did not mention the authority to make health care decisions, and the trial court agreed, denying the motion to compel arbitration. On appeal, this ruling was affirmed. The Court looked to a 2017 Tennessee Supreme Court Case, Beard v.
The judge who temporarily blocked the merger between healthcare data company IQVIA and Propel Media shortly before it was abandoned insisted in his newly published federal courtruling that his decision wasn't a "rubber stamp" of the Federal Trade Commission's request to halt the deal.
In an HCLA case discovery dispute, the Tennessee Court of Appeals ruled that plaintiff’s testifying experts’ “notes, drafts, and communications with counsel” were discoverable under the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure and that plaintiff had waived any claim that the requested items were privileged. In Starnes v.
When the brother was admitted, plaintiff filled out admission paperwork, including an arbitration agreement, as plaintiff had a durable power of attorney for healthcare executed by the brother and naming plaintiff as the attorney-in-fact. In Welch v. Oaktree Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC d/b/a Christian Care Centers of Memphis , No.
30, 2021), plaintiff was the driver of a vehicle owned by a large healthcare company (HMA). After a bench trial, the trial courtruled that HMA did not submit a new application, that the 2002 rejection of uninsured motorist coverage was still in effect, and that there was no uninsured motorist coverage in this case. In Hughes v.
Bradley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center , No. Because the trial court considered this deposition of the NP filed by defendant, the motion should have been considered a motion for summary judgment.) The trial court found that plaintiff had complied with the HCLA, ruling that Exhibit 7 “satisfied the requirements[.]”
the Supreme Court today upholds the dismissal without trial of negligence, wrongful death, and elder abuse claims against a Medicare Advantage HMO and plan administrator for the alleged premature discharge of an 85-year-old man from a skilled nursing facility. A federal Medicare statute preempts those claims, the court concludes.
Where plaintiff alleged that defendant doctor committed intentional misrepresentation and medical battery by stating that he was board-certified in plastic surgery when he was not, the Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling that these claims were not governed by Tennessee’s HCLA. In Cooper v. Mandy , No. citing Franks v.
Where defendant doctor was the supervising physician for defendant nurse midwife, the Court of Appeals ruled that he could be compelled to testify regarding his “expert opinion about the care and treatment provided by” the nurse. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and plaintiff then filed this appeal.
At its weekly conference yesterday, the Supreme Courtruled on only 76 matters, 59 if you don’t count disposals of previous grant-and-hold cases. Taking yet another Senate Bill 1437 case, the court agreed to decide People v. In fact, the Supreme Court filed an SB 1437 opinion just last week. Curiel (2023) 15 Cal.5th
Accord Healthcare, Inc., The brief finally argues that the district court improperly disregarded fact finding by the district court and instead effectively treated written description as an issue of law. This series of procedural events was contrary to this Court’srules and precedent. by Dennis Crouch.
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court granted and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The Court pointed out that the motion in Martin was a motion for summary judgment, which is why the Court therein cited Rule 56, but that the Martin opinion held that “a Rule 12.02(6)
Maricopa County Superior Court of Arizona ruled Wednesday that Arizona’s abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy was unconstitutional and permanently enjoined Arizona employees from enforcing the abortion ban. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes stated she would “not enforce it even if the court upheld the ban.”
A Second Circuit decision vacated two lower courtrulings which allowed healthcare workers to claim religious exemptions to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The decision also vacated an injunction from the Northern District of New York and a prior Second Circuit ruling on an Eastern District of New York case.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Thursday that Arkansas may not prohibit doctors from providing gender-affirming care to transgender youth in the state. A spokesperson for the Arkansas Attorney General expressed disappointment with the ruling and indicated that the state will seek review by the full Eighth Circuit.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain courtrules on retirement.”. Review Active Cases and Address Pending Court Dates. When Do Lawyers Retire? According to the U.S. is 65 for men and 63 for women.
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood of the Heartland announced Friday that they intend to appeal a Lancaster County district courtruling in favor of a Nebraska law restricting both abortions and gender-affirming healthcare to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
The Iowa Supreme Court Friday held in Planned Parenthood v. The decision overturns a 2018 ruling which held there is a fundamental right to abortion in Iowa. After a lower courtruled the law was unconstitutional, Iowa appealed to the state supreme court. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
A Michigan Court of Appeals Monday ruled that the state Attorney General cannot enforce Michigan’s dormant abortion ban but local county prosecutors can. The case stems from a Michigan Court of Claims order from May 17. Thus, county prosecutors are local, not state, actors.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The plaintiffs contend that the mandate violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Wednesday blocked the enforcement of a Louisville ordinance that prevented the obstruction of healthcare facilities by individuals. ” The post US appeals court blocks Louisville abortion clinic buffer zone ordinance appeared first on JURIST - News.
The Texas Supreme Courtruled on Monday against a pregnant woman who challenged the state’s abortion restrictions. A lower court had previously granted the woman, Kate Cox, permission to receive an abortion due to pregnancy complications, despite the state’s strict abortion ban.
A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided for a second time with Texas officials and suspended a lower courtruling that had blocked a Texas law banning most abortions. The order issued late Thursday night stated that the court would expedite the appeal and schedule oral arguments.
The Kansas Supreme Court issued two decisions on Friday striking down a series of abortion rules and restrictions that reaffirmed its 2019 decision that the state constitution guarantees the right to terminate a pregnancy. In its first opinion, the Kansas Supreme Court upheld the district court’s decision.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Monday denied a petition concerning federal preemption of a local law requiring employee health benefits. The Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari after consultation with the Department of Justice (DOJ).
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld Ohio’s HB 214 law that prohibits doctors from performing an abortion with the knowledge that a women’s reason for terminating the pregnancy is a fetal Down syndrome diagnosis. The circuit split has increased the possibility of a Supreme Court review.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content