Remove Court Remove Court Rules Remove Tennessee
article thumbnail

Tennessee Supreme Court rules that TPPA petition does not affect right to nonsuit.

Day on Torts

The Tennessee Supreme Court has affirmed that the filing of a TPPA petition to dismiss by a defendant does not bar a plaintiff from voluntarily dismissing a case. In addition to motions to dismiss, two defendants filed petitions to dismiss under the Tennessee Public Protection Act (“TPPA”). In Flade v. 3d —, No.

article thumbnail

The Clock is Ticking: How to Miss Fewer Court Deadlines

Attorney at Work

Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . A Tennessee lawyer was suspended and put on probation after failing to file a personal injury case. The Solution: Integrated Court Rules.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules reckless offenses do not qualify as ‘violent felony’

JURIST

The US Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that “reckless” crimes qualify as violent felonies for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). The Supreme Court reversed that judgment and remanded the case.

Felony 161
article thumbnail

Bible note changed writer’s will, Tennessee appeals court rules

ABA Journal

A state appeals court has ruled that a handwritten instruction in a Bible that included only the first name of the writer was a valid…

article thumbnail

Federal judge declares Tennessee’s anti-drag bill unconstitutional

JURIST

Judge Thomas Parker, a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Friday ruled that Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA) is unconstitutional. In his opinion, Parker ruled that the AEA violates First Amendment rights. Parker previously enjoined the AEA in April.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court to hear case surrounding firing of Starbucks employees attempting to unionize

JURIST

The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it will hear the case Starbucks Corp. McKinney , originally filed due to Starbucks’ firing of employees attempting to unionize , to determine the appropriate legal standard by which courts should review National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) preliminary injunction decisions.

Court 209
article thumbnail

Snail Darter RIP: The Species that Shut Down the Tellico Dam May Not Actually Exist

JonathanTurley

It required congressional legislation to allow the dam to be finished after years in the courts where judges maintained that the species had to be protected under the Endangered Species Act. Zygmunt Plater, an environmental law professor at Boston College, represented the snail darter before the Supreme Court. That was then.