This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I think it came about with the Utah Supreme Court’s lawyer well-being task force and made a recommendation that there needed to be a study of their lawyers in their state to see what is sort of the condition of their well-being. Just external pressure from clients and then inflexible court deadlines. BREE: Yeah. Absolutely.
Below is my column in the New York Post on the conviction of Hunter Biden in Delaware and how his nullification strategy may have backfired. Here is the column: The conviction of Hunter Biden on all of the federal gun counts created a surprising new precedent in Delaware … for Hunter Biden. It is, again, an open-and-shut case.
The hope for a final pass to the Court ended with an 8-1 decision against the challenge to the federal gun law. ” For Hunter, the pass to the Supreme Court roughly 50 years later just missed in equally spectacular fashion. .” Below is my column on Fox.com on the ruling in United States v. for that period.
It is also important to note that, after the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. By pursuing the nullification strategy, Hunter lost that benefit and now would have to belatedly accept responsibility just before sentencing after putting the court and public through a trial. Booker , sentencing guidelines are discretionary.
That is the problem when your counsel tells the prosecutor in open court to “just rip up” the plea deal. Bray, the Chief United States Probation Officer for the District of Delaware, never signed off on the agreement. The Justice Department just declared, however, that it is dead as Dillinger.
attorney for the District of Delaware, continues to call people before a federal grand jury to testify on Hunter Biden. A court finally forced Hunter to support his child. despite many of us writing for years that what he did was very wrong indeed. Yet, it is becoming increasing hard to spin out of this scandal as David Weiss, the U.S.
.” The filing (below) shows how Hunter’s claims (repeated by many in the media) collapse under even cursory review in court. It is the difference between making a case in the court of public opinion and making a case in an actual court of law. ” The rest of the filing is equally devastating.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.
The Justice Department was never going over the cliff because they had nothing to gain or lose in open-and-shut cases in Delaware and California. The deal then collapsed in open court when a judge balked at a provision that would give Hunter sweeping immunity for any crime. They did and Weiss was forced to actually prosecute Hunter.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.
We previously discussed a federal court upholding the Georgia election law as constitutional this week, rejecting challenges based on voter suppression. However, it has not challenged similar or even more restrictive provisions in other states like Delaware. Those claims were rejected, not affirmed by the court.
Some things are happily left out of the courts. One such case now in court was brought by Amanda DuVall, 28. She is asking for $75,000 but Walmart moved the case to federal court and is contesting the case. The court held that the reckless driving was a foreseeable response of teenagers to the promise of free concert tickets.
The Department of Justice caused an outcry this weekend when it filed a notice to a federal court on a Saturday that it should move ahead and order the jailing of Hunter Biden’s former business associate and fried, Devon Archer. The optics could not be worse and many took the letter as an effort to intimate Archer.
It collapsed in court when the judge asked the prosecutor if he had ever seen such a deal offered to any other defendant. This burning train then continued down the track to California where the team insisted that it would make the same addiction defense that failed in Delaware. He admitted that he had not.
Lowell then suggested in court that someone else may have checked the box on the form. While Hunter could always throw in the towel before the start of testimony, there is currently no discernible strategy beyond hoping that a pending case in the Supreme Court might undermine the indictment.
Below is my column in the New York Post on the increasing use of Hunter Biden’s history of addiction as a defense or excuse for his conduct as possible charges are reportedly under consideration in Delaware. Addiction can be cited as a mitigating factor to the court in determining the defendant’s level of culpability.
In the special counsel’s filing, the court was informed that “an FBI chemist subsequently analyzed the residue and determined that it was cocaine. That possession ended when his sister-in-law Hallie Biden tossed the firearm into a dumpster in Wilmington, Delaware. 12 and Oct.
In the 42-page filing below in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware includes six privacy-related counts. Instead, he claims that the provision is void under a Delawarelaw setting a period of a year to obtain lawful ownership over abandoned property.
Below is my column in Fox.com on the authentication of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the Delaware trial. The FBI declared the laptop to be “real” and “authentic” and the court agreed. Here is the column: Watching the coverage this week out of Delaware was like finding oneself in a parallel universe.
There is a new report this morning that Justice Department officials did go to the resident in Delaware to collect the documents. It is a particularly glaring anomaly after the Justice Department litigated its opposition to allow a court special master to review seized material from Trump.
Notably, in his interview, Clark not only declared “the five-year investigation into Hunter … resolved,” he confirmed that he had no recollection of ever being asked about his client’s abandoned laptop by the investigators in Delaware. After all, the 4-year-old just got her clock cleaned in court. It takes a true Biden to do that.
Where former President Donald Trump was roundly condemned for such testimony in court, Willis was celebrated by many as showing that she is a “great lawyer” and righteous champion. Now, Hunter Biden also seems to have gone full Trump in court and no one appears to have noticed. attorney for Delaware.
Below is an expanded version of my column in the New York Post on the rather bizarre filing of Hunter Biden this week in the Delaware gun charge case. At least that’s what he argues in a new court filing in his federal gun case, which presents Hunter as one of the most tragic figures since the fall of Troy. It then gets even weirder.
The appointment of Delaware U.S. No court could seriously question the right and duty of Congress to get to the bottom of corruption allegations against the president without delay. This is not a case of history repeating itself. Impeachment can work as constitutional Kryptonite.
Here is the column: Hunter Biden returned to court today on the felony indictment for his possession of a handgun, including allegations that he lied on an Oct.12, Notably, House Republicans say, he received two wire transfers totaling $260,000 that listed President Biden’s Delaware home as the beneficiary address for the funds.
When pressed on his lack of credentials for the position, Democratic Senator Tom Carper of Delaware quipped that “ Hunter Biden has spent a lot of time on Amtrak trains.” Indeed, in Washington, it was an open joke when Hunter was put on the Amtrak board and later made its vice chair.
While some legal analysts continue to boost Hunter Biden’s legal claims, the reviews in actual courts are far less glowing. District Judge Maryellen Noreika has also rejected those claims in the gun case in Delaware, calling Hunter’s arguments “nonsensical.”
A court will now have to decide whether this child can call herself a Biden and whether her father can reduce his level of financial support. Here is the column: This week, Hunter Biden’s defense team traveled to Delaware seeking an update on the federal criminal investigation that has dragged on for almost five years.
Law professors ridiculed the concurrence of Justice Thomas in arguing that special counsels lack a constitutional foundation. Biden is now asking the federal courts to adopt the Thomas position. On Thursday, courts in California and Delaware were asked to dismiss the criminal tax and gun cases against Biden.
YouTube Screenshot Below is my column in The Messenger on what I called Biden’s “break-the-glass” option after the disaster in Delaware. District Court for the District of Delaware. The debacle in Delaware still could result in a plea deal. Jean-Pierre cut him off and responded unequivocally “no.”
Below is my column in the Hill on the noticeably narrow scope of charges referenced in the recent FBI leak from the Delaware investigation. Much like the Supreme Court leaking of the Dobbs decision, this one appears intended to trigger a response. The leak raises a number of intriguing questions in its wake.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content