Remove Court Remove Demurrer Remove Technology
article thumbnail

Forecasting the Forecasters: Upcoming Trends in Judicial Analytics

Attorney at Work

The problem, however, was that these insights were impossible to access, especially for attorneys at the state trial court level. There was no effective way to perform practical legal research on state trial court records. State trial court was too scattered, too clunky and too inconsistent to prove useful. The result?

article thumbnail

Bruce’s Beach: A Case Study for Judicial Analytics Best Practices

Attorney at Work

By following its details closely, we can begin to unravel the strategic importance of judicial research and analytics for civil litigation at the state trial court level. By following its details closely, we can begin to unravel the strategic importance of judicial analytics for civil litigation at the state trial court level.

Demurrer 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Review granted in a taxpayer action about COVID speedy trial rights and in yet another SB 1437 case

At the Lectern

At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Court’s actions of note included: Taxpayer standing. The court granted review in Raju v. ” The delays at issue began after a three-month COVID-pandemic shutdown of the superior court. .” The court will also hear People v. Navarro below.)

article thumbnail

Standing to Challenge Inventorship

Patently O

Sywula sued for correction of invention, and the District Court initially dismissed the case on standing, but – after an amended complaint – has now agreed that Sywula has met the requirements to survive a pleading-stage demurrer. Standing to Sue : Federal Courts can only hear “actual cases or controversies.”

article thumbnail

One Panel with Opposing Eligibility Decisions

Patently O

Both district courts dismissed infringement lawsuits at the pleading stage and the “abstract idea” question was up on appeal. In Iqbal and Twombly , the Supreme Court reinterpreted this rule to require nonconclusory allegations of specific facts that make the cause-of-action plausible. Oct 13, 2022).

article thumbnail

Review granted in wages case

At the Lectern

At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, actions of note included: Four-justice concurring statement leaves open future remedies for defendant who made “disastrous decisions” at trial Employment timekeeping. The court agreed to hear Camp v. Superior Court (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th The court granted-and-held Dhital v.