This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Kewalramani), the Central District of California denied Defendant Netflix’s attempts to compel Plaintiff GoTV Streaming to provide documents and further information as to the source of the litigation funding that GoTV received in conjunction with the patent litigation.
The cases continue to flow to the court, and will continue so long as appellate panels continue to entertain them. I’m quite skeptical of parties use of Section 1404 in patent litigation. All of the parties listed above are major nationwide companies that have successfully litigated in courts across the country.
Tower Vision Limited , [1] the Delhi High Court (“HC”) held that an appeal before an Indian civil court was infructuous due to a consent order passed by the Tel Aviv District Court in a matter arising out of the same cause of action. The Indian Supreme Court in Modi Entertainment v.
Attorneys should entertain the possibility of the metaverse becoming a matter of interest in real-world courts by considering what could cause actions outside the virtual world and digital forensics hurdles to be cleared in demonstrating the offense, identifying the culpable parties and collecting damages, say attorneys at Keystone Strategy.
Bloomberg Law News ] * Florida passes social media ban, earning the state another round of costly litigation that it will lose. Reuters ] * NCAA lurches closer to irrelevance as court knocks down its attempt to impose NIL rules. [ ABC ] * "This Isn't MTV Unplugged" identifying yet another thing more entertaining than court.
The Indian Supreme Court dismissed Tuesday a petition seeking the court’s intervention to increase undertrial prisoner visits to the prisons in Delhi, the capital of India. It is not an appeal as of right but is granted at the discretion of the Supreme Court and is given under Article 136 of the Indian Constitution.
The Calcutta High Court of the Indian state of West Bengal dismissed Thursday a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking a special investigation into the attack on Enforcement Directorate (ED) officials in early January. Indian high courts are empowered to issue this writ by virtue of Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.
A New York appeals court's recent decision in Worldview Entertainment v. Woodrow joins a growing trend of decisions denying discovery of litigation funding documents, highlighting that commercial legal finance should be treated just like any other financing in commercial litigation, says Andrew Cohen at Burford Capital.
Delaware's Supreme Court declared Wednesday that there shall be no sequel to the drama from common stockholders of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. who objected to a class settlement of litigation in the state's Chancery Court.
A Delaware vice chancellor plans to reject an AMC Entertainment investor's calls to disqualify a Prickett Jones & Elliott PA attorney appointed to review filings as the court prepares to consider the roughly $130 million settlement of litigation over a purportedly unfair stock conversion.
On October 14th, I was invited to present to the annual conference of the Certified Court Reporters Association of New Jersey (CCRA-NJ). The sessions, in order, were: Better Than AI; Steno, Social Media, and Self-Care; my session on how AI is already changing court reporting, and finally, Addressing Ethical Issues Related to AI.
In The Threat of Deepfakes in Litigation , an article published in the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law , Agnieszka McPeak recommends looking at legal precedent surrounding the authentication of electronically stored information (ESI) and social media posts to understand how to handle deepfakes. In Lorraine v.
A court denied Netflix’s request for GoTV Streaming to supply documents relating to the source of its patent litigation funding. Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri discuss this dispute on this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel. Read more about this case here.
An AMC Entertainment Inc. stockholder who opposed a class settlement that the company reached with other shareholders to end Chancery Courtlitigation over a controversial share conversion told Delaware's Supreme Court Wednesday that the deal should be unwound for lack of due process.
court systems can benefit. Shoppers and workers are, of course, also citizens, and the fact that these citizens are now more willing to handle things online means they’re also more willing to potentially resolve court matters online. civil court system ! court systems for different kinds of cases, such as for traffic offenses.
From finances to entertainment, AI is reshaping how many industries go about their work. Police forces have used predictive crime mapping algorithms for years now, and some courts have turned to AI to manage parole. Civil Litigation. In some ways, this technology is even more helpful in other areas, like civil litigation.
The Supreme Court today agreed to answer this question posed by the Ninth Circuit in Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. The court has shown no interest in COVID insurance issues when they arise in state courtlitigation. of California’s Supreme Court, part 2
Photo by Mathias Reding on Unsplash Climate change litigation has finally reached the world’s highest court. On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States with respect to climate change.
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a lawsuit brought by the city of Baltimore against companies that produce fossil fuels, seeking to hold them responsible for their role in global warming. The case now before the Supreme Court, BP PLC v. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Background.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S. New Jersey.
In this week’s episode, Josh Escovedo and Scott Hervey discuss an update to the litigation over Andy Warhol’s series of portraits of the artist Prince ( Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith). That decision overturned a lower court decision in favor of the Warhol Foundation.
Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v.
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. Mangrove Partners Master Fund (No. Fortinet (No.
Share The court turns to sovereign immunity on Wednesday when it hears argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. This case considers whether principles of sovereign immunity protect that board from suits in federal court. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. Garland , which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, where a divided panel upheld the BIA’s decision.
A jury in the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in the case of Alexander v. In this author’s personal opinion, the District Court got it all wrong. In this author’s personal opinion, the District Court got it all wrong. On this basis, the District court denied summary judgment on this affirmative defense.
‘Tis the season for legal technology predictions, which are entertaining but seldom useful. WebPreserver generates a certificate for authenticating this evidence in court. Trellis lets you search state court dockets to better understand your judge, opposing counsel and the opposing party by analyzing their historical record.
An objector to a $20 million fee request from AMC Entertainment stockholders who recently settled their litigation with the company over a controversial share conversion has asked the court for an interim attorney fee award of $650,000, arguing she properly fought the fee request while the defendants "stayed silent."
In the year 2020, the Nigerian Court of Appeal delivered at least three decisions on foreign choice of court agreements. [1] In the first two decisions delivered in the year 2020, the Nigerian Court of Appeal gave full contractual effect to the parties’ foreign choice of court agreement. [2]
In response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, on March 16, 2020 the Supreme Court of Virginia entered an order declaring a judicial emergency in Virginia. As of its most recent judicial emergency order , the Supreme Court has extended the judicial emergency period through May 17, 2020.
There is another lawsuit pending in state court. The separate lawsuit is still pending in state court in Orlando. The court found that the law was constitutional on its face. If the courts were to block it, it would invite a major intrusion of the courts into decisions on the priorities of legislatures.
14] Since Ticketmaster’s 2010 merger with Live Nation Entertainment, it has faced criticism about its size, power in the entertainment industry, and how it displays the characteristics of a monopoly. [15] 20] When the case was brought by Tickets.com, Ticketmaster and Live Nation Entertainment had not yet merged. [21]
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (“Senate HELP”) is scheduled to take up legislation that could significantly limit access to the courts and immunize critical FDA decisions from timely judicial review. the court shall dismiss without prejudice the action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
The district court, among other things, ordered that Ms. The Second Circuit struck the district court’s order regarding the Instagram account. In a divided opinion, the Second Circuit held that the trial court had not determined that the disputed accounts did not belong to Ms. The case is JLM Couture, Inc. Gutman, S.D.N.Y.,
Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. Judge Alan Albright’s court in the Western District of Texas is rapidly becoming the latest hot spot for patent litigation. Moreover, individual court rules are now requiring greater transparency.
Ron Matthias, a retired California senior assistant attorney general who specialized in homicide appeals, writes in a column appearing in several newspapers about the original writ petition filed in the Supreme Court in April ( Office of the State Public Defender v.
For the second time in less than six weeks, the Ninth Circuit is asking the Supreme Court to answer a question of state law regarding insurance coverage for a business’s losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. of California’s Supreme Court, part 2 Today’s federal appellate panel order , in French Laundry Partners, LLP v.
One of the most vital concerns that a legal practitioner is essentially seen to deal with, that is with respect to any particular dispute or one that has arisen out of a legal relationship between the respective parties subsequently brings into consideration the forum which has/will/have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain such a dispute.
With the foregoing in mind, and given the parties’ alleged inability to resolve the matter out of court, Walker Wear sets out claims of trademark Infringement and dilution, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment, and contends that Off-White has also violated N.Y. That same sentiment might be relevant here.
District Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant with regard to a copyright infringement suit. Lang Van is a California corporation that produces and distributes Vietnamese music and entertainment, owning the copyrights to thousands of songs and programs. In 2014, Lang Van sued VNG for copyright infringement.
Immigration Courts and Due Process. Tips for Construction Litigation. United States , a Supreme Court case upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War 2. ABA Annual Meeting 2019: Equal Pay – Trends in Litigation, Emerging Legislation, & Corporate Equity Initiatives. Immigration Courts.
This year’s meeting featured a handful of extraordinary keynote speakers, engaging session topics, dozens of CLE opportunities, and a great lineup of vendors and entertainment. Author, Musician and Activist Simon Tam weighs in and shares his Supreme Court experience. What Are the Legal Implications of the Astroworld Aftermath?
1] Like in many other common law jurisdictions, Nigerian courts recognize and enforce foreign judgments only if, in the eyes of Nigerian PIL, the foreign court had jurisdiction to render the judgment in question. [2] From a comparative perspective, Canadian courts have applied the real and substantial connection test.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content