This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A US appeals court on Thursday dismissed a challenge to a Tennessee law that restricts drag performances, reversing a lower court’s decision that blocked the law from taking full effect. ” FOG, however, said it was “shocked and disappointed” by the court’s decision on Thursday.
Judge Thomas Parker, a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Friday ruled that Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA) is unconstitutional. The court analyzed the AEA using strict scrutiny, the most demanding standard of judicial review. Parker previously enjoined the AEA in April.
US District Court Judge Ronnie Greer issued a temporary restraining order Friday to prevent Blount County, TN District Attorney General Ryan K. Desmond from interfering with the Blount County Pride Festival under Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA). The Blount County Pride Festival was held on Saturday as planned.
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a lawsuit brought by the city of Baltimore against companies that produce fossil fuels, seeking to hold them responsible for their role in global warming. The case now before the Supreme Court, BP PLC v. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Background.
The Supreme Court of Kenya (SCORK) upheld its earlier decision Tuesday that the LGBTQIA+ community has the freedom to associate, which extends to the formation of associations. The court dismissed the application on two grounds.
Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S. New Jersey.
Share The court turns to sovereign immunity on Wednesday when it hears argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. This case considers whether principles of sovereign immunity protect that board from suits in federal court. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. Garland , which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, where a divided panel upheld the BIA’s decision.
After the New York County Supreme Court issued an injunction which prohibited Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. Garden Entertainment Corp. DID THESE PLAINTIFFS GET THEIR TICKETS PUNCHED? MSG) from denying legitimate ticket-holders access to its venue when attending a theatrical performance or concert, MSG appealed.
After the New York County Supreme Court issued an injunction which prohibited Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. Garden Entertainment Corp. DID THESE PLAINTIFFS GET THEIR TICKETS PUNCHED? ” Did the AD1 split the ticket there? ” Did the AD1 split the ticket there? .”
Where the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint was his tort claim for defamation seeking unliquidated damages, the chancery court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and the case should have been transferred to circuit court. The trial court denied the motion and ultimately found for plaintiff. In Lowery v. Redmond , No.
New York’s post mortem right-of-publicity statute recently came into effect. Because the statute addressed privacy concerns that dissipated at death, such rights did not extend post mortem. Because the statute addressed privacy concerns that dissipated at death, such rights did not extend post mortem.
Hansen when the Supreme Court heard argument on whether 8 U.S.C. The newly reconfigured Court appears less strongly speech-protective than its recent predecessors — and perhaps interested in making big moves to constrain or even do away with the overbreadth doctrine. The argument unfolded in many ways as expected.
Share Several police officers outside the Supreme Court building have donned masks as haze from Canadian wildfires has become more noticeable in Washington this morning. Elliott for historical correctness, but the issue is a bit complex and the court likely had several reasons for putting the Kansas case first.
the Supreme Court today interprets a statute so as to make it more difficult for a juvenile court to terminate a parental relationship when reunification of the child with the parent is not an option. ” The court reverses the First District, Division One, Court of Appeal. .” In In re Caden C. ,
As some Supreme Court podcasters have noted, Justice Stephen Breyer’s retirement announcement in late January pushed the so-called Maskgate controversy out of the spotlight. Perhaps the court has concluded that certain podcasters are in need of more fodder for their metaphors about the status of the court.
Supreme Court is not the only court with a shadow docket, “shadow docket” referring to cases decided without full briefing or oral argument. California’s Supreme Court has one, too. It requested an answer from the Supreme Court. City of Yuba City (9th Cir. 2018) 884 F.3d 3d 838, 842.) 120, 121, fn.
Supreme Court’s decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Federal Trade Commission , 598 U.S. _ (2023), allows federal district courts to consider constitutional challenges to administrative proceedings prior to the issuance of final rulings. Cochran’s and Axon’s suits were both dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in Serova v. Sony Music Entertainment. The court granted review — for a second time — in April 2020. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.) It was reported last week that the case has settled. Proc., § 425.16)? (2) & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) See Kasky v.
In the year 2020, the Nigerian Court of Appeal delivered at least three decisions on foreign choice of court agreements. [1] In the first two decisions delivered in the year 2020, the Nigerian Court of Appeal gave full contractual effect to the parties’ foreign choice of court agreement. [2]
Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Supreme Court decided Lucia v. Because the SSA ALJs who denied petitioners’ claims were also appointed by lower-level staff, the petitioners argued in federal court that they were entitled to a fresh administrative review by constitutionally appointed ALJs. Supreme Court’s Decision.
Although it required invention in name, it was really just becoming a replacement to monopolies barred by the Statute of Monopolies (1624). . On the 17th day of February last, the complainant, by his counsel, moved this court for a rule that the patentees show cause why process should not issue against them to repeal the above patent.
The defendants moved to dismiss Mr. Elden’s complaint, arguing that it was barred by the applicable 10-year statute of limitations for such claims. The district court agreed with the defendants and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Mr. Elden appealed that dismissal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.
District Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant with regard to a copyright infringement suit. Lang Van is a California corporation that produces and distributes Vietnamese music and entertainment, owning the copyrights to thousands of songs and programs. In 2014, Lang Van sued VNG for copyright infringement.
Yesterday’s Supreme Court conference dealt with an unusually large number of cases, even for the double conference that it was. The court granted review in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court , an employment retaliation case that was headed to arbitration until the defendant employer delayed paying fees to the arbitration provider.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week. The two most closely watched involve whether the Court should overrule its landmark decision in Chevron v. The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc. 837 (1984).
Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the Court. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court reversed by a vote of 6-3.
Photo by Mathias Reding on Unsplash Climate change litigation has finally reached the world’s highest court. On March 29, 2023, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States with respect to climate change.
At its conference yesterday, a double one, the court granted the petitions for review of two public entities, one county and one city. The court granted Los Angeles County’s petition for review in Olympic and Georgia Partners, LLC v. Oakland has successfully petitioned the Supreme Court for review in Crescent Trust v.
Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The court ruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts. 47 U.S.C. § 230(e)(3).
The Supreme Court today announced it would hear arguments in seven cases at its next calendar, the second of two calendars in May. This will be a heavier calendar than the court has had in a while. There haven’t been more than five arguments in a month since the court heard seven cases last June. Proc., § 425.16)? (2)
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (“Senate HELP”) is scheduled to take up legislation that could significantly limit access to the courts and immunize critical FDA decisions from timely judicial review. the court shall dismiss without prejudice the action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear nine cases on its late-May calendar. That’s as many arguments as on next week’s large early-May calendar , and it puts the court on pace to issue well over 50 opinions this term. The court granted review in March 2023. The court granted review in August 2022.
Although Dr Oppong did not examine the attitude of Nigerian courts on this issue, his new work which he co-authored with Dr Okoli ( Okoli and Oppong, 2020 ) gives us an insight. Jurisdiction agreements are otherwise called choice of court agreements. Jurisdiction agreements in Nigerian courts. The book is an excellent piece.
At yesterday’s Supreme Court’s conference , a double one, actions of note included: AB 333 retroactivity. The court agreed to hear People v. where he appeals for a second time after his judgment was conditionally reversed and the Court of Appeal issued a limited remand to the trial court to address sentencing issues?
The courts’ focus will be on whether this copying is part of an overall transformative process to be weighed against the commercial impact the tool has on the applicable industry. California also has a common law right of publicity that’s a bit broader than the statute. The Waits court, which relied on Midler, found similarly.
In addition to the traditional protections afforded under the Lanham Act, as well as those under state and common law, some of the Olympic trademarks are protected by a special statute, designed in order to allow the USOC exclusive rights to control all commercial use of USOC trademarks, imagery and/or terminology in the United States.
Here are some of the notable actions at yesterday’s Supreme Court conference , a double one: Three-justice separate statement in denial of habeas petition filed by youth offender serving an LWOP sentence because she tried to protect her boyfriend Supreme Court won’t hear Ninth-Circuit-referred sexual assault case against Uber Solar energy rates.
Supreme Court precedents and so should be tied to the “substantial likelihood” that a reasonable investor would consider the data important when making an investment or voting decision. and Sony Music Entertainment Inc.), (b) active in California or New York, or (c) U.S. The California statute should cover 5,000 U.S.
Concerns were brought to the Courts that such modifications or amendment of pleadings harmed the opposite party as well as slowed down the process of civil proceedings, resulting in piling up of cases. The principle followed in Civil Procedural Law is that the Court procedures and rules are designed to achieve substantial justice.
They also keep track of deadlines, ensuring that courts receive filings on time. They often handle direct communication with clients, though they cant give legal advice or represent anyone in court. Theyve got the formal training and legal authority to represent clients in court, give advice, and negotiate settlements.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain court rules on retirement.”. Review Active Cases and Address Pending Court Dates. Prior to retirement, lawyers need to deal with open cases, pending court dates, and active client files.
The first “ six-week ban ,” under the state’s statute section 311.7706, prohibits doctors from terminating pregnancy if there is a detectable fetal heartbeat unless it is necessary to prevent the mother’s death or substantial and irreversible impairment. The case concerns two different abortion bans. Wade in June 2022.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content