Court Felony Immigration Louisiana 
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 20, 2024
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Louisiana , the justices ruled that Miller also applied retroactively – that is, to anyone sentenced before 2012. A trial court in Arizona agreed that Bassett was entitled to a hearing. In Bassett v.
JURIST
JUNE 24, 2023
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. Justice Kavanaugh writes, quoting Linda R.S. :
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
APRIL 7, 2021
Texas and Louisiana filed suit against the federal government Tuesday in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleging that immigration authorities declined to take custody of convicted individuals who could be subject to deportation.
The Crime Report
APRIL 19, 2022
By night he drafted court documents for judges to sign. As a subsequent ruling by the Texas Court of Appeals finally made clear, the arrangement was not a momentary lapse in judgment or a one-time offense induced under pressure. They complained to an immigration and employment attorney about long hours and poor living conditions.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 19, 2024
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. 23 conference and the April 12 conference — that’s six conferences — the Supreme Court relisted just one new case. This week, the court also began clearing out some relists that have been hanging around for a while.
HowAppealing
NOVEMBER 29, 2022
“Supreme Court Weighs Reviving Biden Immigration Guidelines; The justices wrestled with questions about states’ standing to sue, whether the guidelines were lawful and the limits of judicial power over immigration”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G. ” David G.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. The court dispensed with the cities’ three primary arguments for remanding the cases. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 107.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
108 
Let's personalize your content