Court Felony North Dakota 
JURIST
MARCH 16, 2023
The North Dakota Supreme Court Thursday upheld a preliminary injunction on the state’s abortion ban while litigation on the matter proceeds. 31-12 , which went into effect after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. The injunction stops enforcement of N.D.C.
JURIST
APRIL 25, 2023
North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum Monday signed one of the country’s most restrictive abortion bans into law. Under this bill, performing an abortion in the state is a Class C felony, which can result in a maximum five-year prison sentence if convicted.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
JUNE 13, 2023
The Center for Reproductive Rights, Gender Justice and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP announced Monday that they filed an amended complaint on behalf of women’s health clinic Red River Women’s Clinic, formerly based in North Dakota, challenging the state’s newly passed and signed abortion ban, SB 2150.
JURIST
JANUARY 25, 2024
A North Dakota judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction Tuesday, allowing the state’s abortion ban to remain in effect. The center asked the court to allow doctors to continue using their “good-faith medical judgment” to perform abortions in such situations.
JURIST
JUNE 24, 2024
The US Supreme Court announced Monday it will review the legality of state efforts to ban gender-affirming medical care for minors — a contentious issue in a nation deeply divided over transgender rights and the role of medical intervention in youth gender identity. In November, the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.
JURIST
JUNE 30, 2024
The Texas Supreme Court upheld a statutory ban on gender-affirming care for minors on Friday. The Texas Supreme Court found that SB 14 does not infringe on the parental right to make medical care decisions for their children because that right competes with the interest of protecting children from harm.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it. FEATURED CASE. A divided D.C. Clean Air Council v. Pruitt , No.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
197 
Let's personalize your content