This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
So far we’ve seen Perkins Coie and Williams & Connolly take their stands in court, Rachel Cohen stake her employment at Skadden , and the American Constitution Society call on law school deans to take a public stand for the rule of law. We cannot accept government actions that seek to twist the scales of justice in this manner.
government, according to the April 16 opinion by the Appellate Divisions Second Judicial Department of the New York Supreme Court. Higgenbotham pleaded guilty to a count of making false statements to a bank. I guess that’s one way to get a Change To Come. Maybe he can join a Family Business ?
The Court reasoned that the government may have in interest in having people in positions of authority that represent the demographics of the troops that they lead. The truth is that communities care who wields the gavel, and we may be better off if and when the one calling order to the court is a member of a minority group.
I think this predicament is a direct result of two Supreme Court cases. Before Bruen , we understood there were some arms that the government can regulate — no civilian rocket launchers. After Bruen , a regulating government has to resort to what is effectively mereology.
Here’s an excerpt of their statement : We are very concerned by recent statements by elected officials and administration representatives that put into question courts authority to review the legality of executive action. … Defiance of court orders by our government is incompatible with our constitutional democracy.
Over 200 Venezuelan nationals were deported for their alleged ties to the criminal gang Tren De Aragua, but the government never met the burden of proving that they were, you know, members of or affiliated with the gang. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Law.com has coverage: There were planeloads of people.
An open letter by Lawyers For Good Government speaking out against Executive abuses was signed by over 2,100 attorneys. lawyers, our oath is not just a formality; it is a binding commitment to uphold the Constitution on which our entire system of government is based.
(Photo by ERIN SCHAFF/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) Last month, Justice Sonia Sotomayor was pretty confident in the soft power that courts would be able to deploy as a check against the Trump administration. Things might look bad right now, but it’s not like the administration would just openly defy court orders, right?
Tenured professors are getting fired for sharing thoughts that aren’t in line with mainstream political doxa or being forced into protracted court battles to get back into their class rooms. And the backlash isn’t just hitting professors.
And given the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent opinion, that problem may be here to stay for a while. From WTOP : The Democratic governor of Wisconsins creative use of his uniquely powerful veto to lock in a school funding increase for 400 years may be attention grabbing, but it was constitutional, the state Supreme Court ruled Friday.
The separation of church and state is usually invoked to argue against the state being turned into a religious outpost, but its reversal should also hold true — the government shouldn’t be able to target places of religious worship to harvest and imprison or deport the undocumented, right?
These precedents establish that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from relying on the threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion. In inflicting this retribution, the Order contradicts centuries of precedent safeguarding free speech, the right of association, and the right to petition. Natl Rifle Assn v.
About that… apparently the Executive has the authority to find court orders “erroneous.” Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. It seems couched in the assumptions that people are willing to advocate for the rule of law and that the government will heed their petitions. ” Sotomayor changed her tune by March.
Courts overturned Nixon, Bush, and Trump. ” It isn’t “lawless” if the Supreme Court rules that an abuse of power was abusive. … These bold assertions, designed to intimidate judges by threatening removal if they do not rule the government’s way, cross the line. Thats literally their job.
Many have spoken out against Trump’s targeted attacks on the rule of law: a sitting Supreme Court justice , a former Supreme Court justice , hundreds of law school professors ; the list goes on. Reuters has coverage: More than 1,100 law students on Tuesday filed a court brief supporting law firm Susman Godfrey, saying U.S.
There might be some debate over if the right “types” of Christian are filling the ranks, be they Mormon or Catholic, but unless there’s some secret Zoroastrian front calling all of the shots, whatever anti-Christian sentiment happening in the government is likely coming from other Christians squabbling over doctrinal differences.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content