SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court announced that it would hold its “mop up” conference for October Term 2022 on Thursday, after completing the day’s opinion announcements. Legal Services Alabama, Inc. , New Relists Muldrow v.

Immigration 99

Immigration Court Government Laws 99

The Crime Report

APRIL 26, 2022

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in the Biden administration’s appeal of lower-court rulings that required immigration officials to reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy that the administration “has twice determined is not in the interests of the United States,” reports the Associated Press.

Court Decisions 52

Court Decisions Immigration Court Court Rules 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 31, 2022

The Supreme Court’s January sitting started off with the late addition of two cases challenging vaccine mandates imposed by the Biden Administration. The central issue before the Court in both cases is whether the vaccine mandates should be allowed to move forward while the legal challenges work their way through the lower courts.

Immigration 52

Immigration Statute Tort Healthcare 52

LegalTalkNetwork

FEBRUARY 5, 2019

Per the usual, there was a lot more going on than we could possibly cover but we did manage to feature highlights from the best volunteers and minds in the legal profession. We also learned more about the ABA’s actions in immigration, the government shutdown, and changes to their website. hails from Butte, Montana.

Legal Research 40

Legal Research Immigration Legal Legal 40

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

support to Ukraine” as well as “irregular immigration.” Recently, a court found that the Biden Administration’s censorship efforts constituted “ the most massive attack against free speech in United States history. criticized me for offering “legal opinions” without working at Twitter.

Government 66

Government Immigration Laws Constitutional Law 66

JURIST

DECEMBER 2, 2021

The announcement follows an August US Supreme Court order requiring the MPP to restart over the Biden Administration’s objections. The Trump DHS argued that MPP was necessary to restore an orderly immigration process and reduce frivolous asylum claims. MPP is expected to restart on December 6.

Immigration 181

Immigration Court Legal Legal 181

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in the battle over the Biden administration’s efforts to end one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration policies. During nearly two hours of oral argument in Biden v. It was, Prelogar stressed, an exercise of “his statutory discretion to make a policy judgment.”.

Immigration 98

Immigration Statute Government Court 98

JURIST

DECEMBER 14, 2021

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Monday denied the Biden administration’s appeal to terminate the Trump-era Migration Protection Protocols (MPP), affirming a Texas district court’s decision that would require the administration to leave the MPP intact.

Court 197

Court Immigration Statute Government 197

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Numerous groups attack the viability standard that the court adopted in Roe v. Three physicians and the Catholic Association Foundation write that advances in science have “painted an intimate portrait of the fetus and its humanity” and therefore the court’s viability framework is outdated. Amicus briefs supporting Mississippi.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Court Laws Statute 98

Above The Law

JUNE 23, 2025

And before you hand wave associating his extremism with conservatism proper, gerrymandering to water down black votership and Texan immigrant murder buoys are squarely contemporary conservative policy; Damsky isn’t breaking much new ground here. He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St.

Immigration 86

Immigration Law School Laws Legal 86

The Volokh Conspiracy

JUNE 11, 2025

It states that it shall be the policy of the United States to combat anti-Semitism vigorously, using all available and appropriate legal tools, to prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account the perpetrators of unlawful anti-Sematic harassment and violence. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("U.S.C.I.S.")

Court 103

Court Government Immigration Education 103

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 103

The Crime Report

APRIL 25, 2022

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments this week on the legality of the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy, officially called “Migrant Protection Protocols”, that has been a centerpiece of efforts to deter asylum-seekers, reports the Associated Press.

Court 40

Court Lawyers Lawyer Legal 40

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to decide whether the Biden administration must continue to enforce the Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S. immigration court. After the U.S.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Litigation Litigating 100

JURIST

AUGUST 21, 2021

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Thursday denied the Biden Administration a stay on a district court order reinstating a Trump-era policy requiring asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their immigration cases are pending. Texas and Missouri are challenging the MPP’s termination.

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Calendaring Government 104

The Volokh Conspiracy

JUNE 4, 2025

And there have been regimes through history that have tried to—currently, Viktor Orbán in Hungary said very explicitly, "I don't want more immigrants. But those are none of— Yeah—none of that implies a different legal standing or anything like that. I mean, to me, what I consider to be a lot of children. I want more Hungarians."

Education 97

Education Technology Government Construction 97

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Share Can the Biden administration issue guidelines setting priorities in the enforcement of immigration law? And if the guidelines are unlawful, does the Administrative Procedure Act give lower courts the power to vacate them — a universal remedy that goes beyond the parties to the case? Texas , set to be argued on Nov.

Immigration 103

Immigration Court Laws Statute 103

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Monday added nine new cases to its docket, including a high-profile dispute over the extent of technology companies’ immunity from lawsuits based on the content they host. However, the majority concluded, Congress – rather than the courts – should clarify how broadly Section 230 applies.

Court 127

Court Immigration Education Government 127

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

Share On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Biden v. immigration court. In March 2020, the court allowed the Trump administration to begin enforcing the policy after a federal district judge in California blocked it. In October 2020, the Supreme Court agreed to review a ruling by the U.S.

Immigration 103

Immigration Court Government Laws 103

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Remain in Mexico” policy. As the case proceeded to an appeal in the U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman.

Laws 139

Laws Immigration Court Legal 139

JURIST

AUGUST 25, 2021

The US Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Biden administration Tuesday night when it refused to grant a stay of a lower court order requiring the administration reinstate a Trump-era immigration policy. Texas and Missouri sued the government in federal district court, challenging the termination of the program.

Court 245

Court Immigration Government Legal 245

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’s decision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Supreme Court seeking review of the D.C. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. The states contended that further delay in the Court’s resolution of these “weighty issues” would have “serious and far-reaching costs.” FEATURED CASE. 20-1530 (U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

Above The Law

MAY 8, 2025

His case is still live — a judge recently ordered the DOJ to offer a legal basis for Khalil’s detainment. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. Things may have played out a little differently if the Supreme Court explicitly said “Bring Garcia’s ass back within 7 business days.” Would you look at that!

Social Media Management 113

Social Media Management Immigration Law School Court 113