This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Michele Benedetto Neitz, Pulling Back the Curtain: Implicit Bias in the LawSchool Dean Search Process, 49 SETON HALL L. An implicit bias is “‘an association or preference that is not consciously generated and is experienced without awareness.’"
Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard LawSchool. . Harper stems from a challenge to NorthCarolina’s congressional and legislative redistricting plan as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The NorthCarolina General Assembly immediately appealed that ruling.
Marisa Wright is a US National Correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard LawSchool. . The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday morning in two cases challenging the validity of race-conscious affirmative action programs in college admission. University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions Inc.
Marisa Wright is a US national staff correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard LawSchool. . Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next Monday in a case that could have major implications for racial equality and college admissions. The Court will consider two questions presented by the case.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has delivered a body blow to free speech as well as academic freedom in a ruling against a statistics professor at NorthCarolina State University. Professor Stephen Porter objected to what he considered the lower standards used by his school to hire minority faculty.
described his colleague as a trailblazing and civic-minded presence on the Supreme Court”: Zach Montague of The New York Times has this report. ” And Michael Austin and Jazper Lu of The Duke Chronicle report that “ Chief Justice John Roberts speaks at Duke Law ceremony honoring late Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.”
How many of the lawyers out there liked hypotheticals in lawschool? So, for those of you who enjoy hypotheticals, here it is: Company A, a NorthCarolina LLC, owns four patents. Company B has the same corporate address in NorthCarolina and the same five shareholders as Company A.
Anthony Perkins in a still photo from Orson Well’s 1962 film version of “The Trial” In Franz Kafka’s sinister 1925 novel, The Trial, the hero finds himself the defendant in a court case where he is unaware of what law he has broken. NorthCarolina Justice. Could that happen in the U.S.?
University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. The one unfortunate exception to this rule has been the Supreme Court’s approval of racial discrimination in education, which has allowed discrimination against Asian students, most prominently, to fester and grow. President & Fellows of Harvard College.
Notably, the most-downloaded episode featured a discussion of how lawschools should teach tech, with April G. Dawson , associate dean of technology and innovation and professor of law at NorthCarolina Central University School of Law. How LawSchools Should Teach Tech, with April Dawson.
Supreme Court case of Brady v. The NorthCarolina Innocence Inquiry Commission , created after a high-profile case of prosecutorial misconduct in 2006, has since helped secure 15 exonerations. The National Registry of Exonerations estimates that 30 percent of exoneration cases feature prosecutorial misconduct.
Lawschools are also facing controversial mandates. In 2022, the American Bar Association required lawschools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism: (1) at the start of the program of legal education, and (2) at least once again before graduation.” and Maurice C.
University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. Bernstein holds a university professorship chair at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia LawSchool. The Supreme Court should no longer countenance this charade. President & Fellows of Harvard College. A preview of the case is here.
by David Hricik, Mercer LawSchool. That, said the court, was unethical: “Although a client can decide on its own whether to directly contact his adversary, a lawyer cannot advise a client to contact his adversary, or do anything that the attorney could not do directly. In NorthCarolina Legal Eth. 2012-7 (Oct.
I am happy to announce the publication of my latest law review article, The Unfinished Masterpiece: Compulsion and the Evolving Jurisprudence Over Free Speec h. The work not only discusses the recent 303 Creative ruling of the Supreme Court, but an important case now pending before the Court for possible review, Porter v.
Researchers at the Quattrone Center, based at the University of Pennsylvania Carey LawSchool, created what they said was a unique dataset of 4,644 opinions in which allegations of misconduct were raised in the more than 1.5 million judicial opinions published between 2000 and 2016 by federal and state courts in Pennsylvania.
Notably, the most-downloaded episode featured a discussion of how lawschools should teach tech, with April G. Dawson , associate dean of technology and innovation and professor of law at NorthCarolina Central University School of Law. How LawSchools Should Teach Tech, with April Dawson.
Ho of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently made headlines when he publicly declared that he would no longer consider graduates of Yale LawSchool for clerkship positions due to the erosion of free speech rights at the university. Judge James C.
The survey covered The Ohio State University, University of Nebraska-Omaha, University of NorthCarolina-Chapel Hill, University of Georgia, Cornell University, University of Oklahoma and the University of Alaska-Anchorage. It is that easy.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
Yesterday, I published a column on the disgraceful actions taken by students and Stanford DEI Dean Tirien Steinbach in an event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Instead, it turns out that it was the free speech itself that was so stressful and painful for the law dean.
We recently discussed the case of University of NorthCarolinalaw student Sagar Sharma, a student of color, who faced a recall election as the first-year class co-president. The charges are connected to the prior controversy and raise serious free speech and retaliatory concerns at the lawschool. .
We also learned some new things about “ deepfakes ” and how that could affect legal practice, why litigation finance is about to get really interesting, how ODR is closing one part of the A2J gap, and why virtual reality may become a real staple in courts very soon.
Share In 2003, a divided Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that the University of Michigan LawSchool could consider race in its admissions process as part of its efforts to assemble a diverse student body. How, Alito asked, can a court determine whether the benefits of diversity have been achieved?
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
EDT, Duke LawSchool and O’Melveny & Myers LLP will co-host a virtual memorial service for Walter Dellinger and his wife, Anne Dellinger. Walter Dellinger, a constitutional scholar who argued 24 cases at the Supreme Court, died on Feb. Share On Saturday, March 19, at 1 p.m. The event is open to all.
Share Walter Dellinger, a constitutional scholar and skilled advocate who argued 24 cases at the Supreme Court, died on Wednesday at his home in Chapel Hill, NorthCarolina. He was a long-time member of the Duke LawSchool faculty, which he joined in 1969. William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law at Duke LawSchool.
There is a curious resolution of a civil right complaint against University of Minnesota LawSchool over a diversity fellowship sponsored by the law firm of Jones Day. Despite being created by a law firm and administered by a lawschool, the fellowship violated federal law in excluding white and male applicants.
The trial penalty that coaxes both the guilty and innocent to enter pleas is exacerbated by mandatory minimum statutes, which trigger automatic penalties if invoked by the prosecutor, as well as sentencing enhancements within the discretion of the prosecutor, such as whether to file notice with the court of a prior offense. In fact, the U.S.
.’” Michele Benedetto Neitz, Pulling Back the Curtain: Implicit Bias in the LawSchool Dean Search Process , 49 SETON HALL L. So, does a court violate the Constitutional rights of an African American defendant by precluding his attorney about implicit bias during jury selection? 629, 656 (2019) ( quoting J. Redfield ed.,
For example, according to Josie Caves Sivaraman, a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Duke University School of Medicine, NorthCarolina has no restriction, and anyone over the age of 18 can purchase a firearm. Darrell Miller, an attorney and a Melvin G.
American Lawyer ] * A crypto business breaking the law? Law360 ] * What do we know about online lawschools. [ ABA Journal ] * NorthCarolina GOP effort to toss 60,000 votes to win a state supreme court seat they have lost on multiple recounts includes some "surreal" challenges.
It was always doubtful that a lawschool would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. The problem is that most targets of these campaigns have neither the status nor the day job of a Supreme Court justice. The reason? His vote to overturn Roe v.
Supreme Court Photographer Fred Schilling, 2022. We previously discussed how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson included a false claim to support her dissent in the Court’s recent opinion barring racial discrimination in college admissions. It saves lives. Experts immediately objected that the claim was wildly off base.
Being an election year and with tumultuous police/citizen relations, a vacancy at the Supreme Court, an uptick in terrorism, and a worldwide refugee crisis, there was certainly a lot to talk about. Day one’s late day coverage began just following our arrival in San Francisco, when we talked about Terrorism, FISA Courts, and the Zika virus.
This movement is expanding and accelerating in its effort to curtail the right that Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “indispensable” to our constitutional system. He repeatedly had to go to court to defend his right to continue to teach. Ready to sign your rights away? Wait, there is more.
Then we all read the rationale from Law Dean William Treanor , who adopted a technicality that not only avoided a full endorsement of Shapiro’s rights but left a menacing uncertainty as to his (and any other conservative’s) future protections at Georgetown University LawSchool. It was a stupid and offensive tweet.
the University of NorthCarolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. The state of Texas writes that college admissions “stand alone” as a departure from the court’s “long-held skepticism regarding racial discrimination” as seen in its rejection of diversity as a compelling interest in secondary schools and faculty hiring.
Here is the column: The first major decision of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson after her Supreme Court nomination may be to recuse herself from one of the most significant cases before the court. For a lower court judge, this would be a no brainer. Judge Jackson’s nomination magnified the controversy in an unexpected way.
A professor at the University of NorthCarolina recently sent me an article on a “free speech event” held at the UNC Center for Media Law and Policy as part of the University’s 13th First Amendment Day celebration. Moreover, if there is defamation, the courts allow for stripping away anonymity in many cases.
A government lawyer who argued at the Supreme Court more than anyone else in the 20th century. As the year comes to a close, SCOTUSblog looks back at some of the individuals who died in 2020 after living lives that brought them – at different times and for different reasons – to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Bloomberg Law News ] * NorthCarolina overrules precedent from last year because nothing matters and it's just a superlegislature. Splash 247 ] * A profile on how ASS Law leverages Supreme Court connections to artificially inflate its apparent prestige. [ appeared first on Above the Law. NY Times ] *.
This trend has reached lawschools, which is ominous since these students are the future judges and lawyers who are expected to defend these core principles. From high schools through lawschools, free speech has gone from being considered a right that defines our society to being dismissed as a threat.
After months of dire predictions of a coup in the making, the Court overwhelmingly rejected the underlying “independent state legislature,” as some of us predicted. Harper, in which NorthCarolina legislators argued that state courts could not override state legislatures on federal election districts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content