This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The first plaintiff scheduled to go to trial against drug manufacturers for the heartburn medication Zantac Tuesday dropped his suit. ranitidine) caused him to develop esophageal cancer, told the court and drug manufacturers that he intended to file a notice of voluntary dismissal.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a North Carolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction on Friday against the Illinois assault weapon ban passed earlier this year. Circuit Judge Diane Wood authored the 2-1 majority opinion of the court. This is not the only litigation involving PICA. This allows the ban to go into effect.
Climate litigation in Germany has achieved another major victory. On November 30, 2023, the Higher Administrative Court Berlin-Brandenburg ruled in DUH and BUND v. Germany of the Federal Constitutional Court, the focus of the decision is not on fundamental rights, but on administrative questions of climate governance and enforcement.
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Monday publicly released a letter that found Pennsylvania’s court system violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because it prohibited or limited individuals under court supervision from taking medication to treat opioid use disorder (OUD).
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. This doctrine allows the government to potentially dismiss litigation that would require disclosure of information damaging to national security. involves a complicated copyright dispute between two clothing manufactures.
Gaulkin & Esther Petrikovsky Last week, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in FDA v. To the manufacturers chagrin, FDA squarely rejected approximately 1.2 The Supreme Court overruled the Fifth Circuit, holding that FDA had not acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. By Andrew J. Hull & David B.
23-1141 took place in March 2025 before the US Supreme Court. As previously indicated, this is a much-politicized case brought by Mexico against US gun manufacturers. The proceedings This case before the US Supreme Court is about overcoming a motion to dismiss. The hearing before the US Supreme Court took place on 4 March 2025.
Share Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy deal, which will reach the Supreme Court for oral argument on Monday , is just one of many examples of recent unorthodox civil procedure maneuvers in public harms litigation. But can bankruptcy court solve a public health crisis?
The IP court has ruled in Newman Infinites favor on 10 of the 14 points contested, a major win that Microsoft now faces in a pending appeal. Gaston Kroub: How do you see your litigation experience coloring your company’s approach to IP issues going forward?
The case is in the US District Court for the Southern District of California. The California law makes it a felony to manufacture, distribute, import, keep for sale or lend assault weapons. The case will likely be appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Its definition of assault weapon covers guns like AR-15s.
Last week, building electrification secured an important victory in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, held that EPCA preempted a Berkeley ordinance that prohibited natural gas piping in new buildings. City of Berkeley ( Berkeley ). In Berkeley , a panel for the U.S.
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S. founder and CEO.
Kroger, which has a large presence in West Virginia, is the last of the major pharmacies that remain a defendant in the litigation. The litigation against Kroger is scheduled for trial in June. Additionally, Rite Aid agreed to settle for $30 million in August 2022.
Endo will continue litigating other claims not covered by this settlement agreement. Just last month a New York jury found opioid manufacturer Teva Pharmaceuticals USA liable for public nuisance after it inundated the state with pills, killing thousands of people. and Endo Health Solutions Inc.,
3M's attempt to shift the massive multidistrict litigation over the manufacturer's defective earplugs to a federal bankruptcy court is a deeply troubling move to avoid a fair trial, and should not be allowed to proceed, says Robert Klonoff at Lewis & Clark Law School.
As of now, very little information is known about what monetary judgements courts will typically reward. That’s because the manufacturing companies and rideshares have been overly willing to settle these cases outside of court.
The centerpiece of Cuomo’s plan is a new law to allow victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers under a nuisance theory. Indeed, its main component — a law allowing citizens to sue gun manufacturers — will be as productive as trying to win the New York Marathon by running furiously in place. Andrew Cuomo.
By Faraz Siddiqui — As drug manufacturers battle the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) in federal courts over the role of 340B contract pharmacies, an Eighth Circuit decision to uphold a 2021 Arkansas law may render those cases inconsequential in that state. Code Ann. § 23-92-604(c)(1), (2) (Act 1103).
Deepsouth litigated its case to the Supreme Court, and the Court eventually allowed the company to escape some portion of its adjudged liability based upon the territorial limits of U.S. ” However on certiorari, the Supreme Court felt itself bound by the statute and precedent. patent law. We know that U.S.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Litigants in federal courts may unwittingly find themselves in a “finality trap,” a tricky procedural scenario in which they are unable to appeal some of their claims.
This latest ruling stands in contrast to the court's January 2025 decisions upholding preliminary injunctions against Samsung Bioepis and Formycon, effectively blocking their biosimilar launches. All three cases are part of consolidated multi-district litigation in the Northern District of West Virginia. 14, 2025) (Lourie, J.).
In litigation filed in both California state and federal courts, plant-based food company, Beyond Meat, was sued by Don Lee Farms, a former collaborator, who alleged BM was guilty of false advertising and contract breach. Parties Get to the Meat of the Matter. No party admitted liability or wrongdoing in connection with the settlement.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday issued orders from its so-called “long conference” – the justices’ private conference in the last week of September, at which they met for the first time since the end of June to add new cases to their docket. The trial court rejected that argument, and the California Court of Appeals agreed.
The Supreme Court has not yet granted writ of certiorari in any patent cases this term. Still, there are a number of important patent cases pending before the court. Still, there are a number of important patent cases pending before the court. Eligibility under Section 101 : American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.
In relevant part, the ‘543 Patent covers a two-step method for manufacturing a sheet pile section with an interlock connector. Hermes I is owned by ArcelorMittal Commercial RPS, which manufactures a sheet pile system called the “HZM System,” distributed by Skyline. Here, the court found some guidance in Zubulake V.
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S. founder and CEO.
The 340B program, authorized under Section 340B of the Public Health Services Act and administered by HRSA, imposes a ceiling price on pharmaceutical manufacturer sales to “covered entities,” which are certain health clinics that receive federal funding and certain types of safety net hospitals to provide them drugs at lower prices.
A Pennsylvania clothing manufacturer panned Nike Inc.'s s alleged "intransigence" and obstructive conduct in fighting a trademark infringement lawsuit, as the business pushed for attorneys fees in federal court following a remand from the Third Circuit.
If they do get lodged in the court, it could take years to resolve as well-funded manufacturers will do anything to keep their reputation intact. . Remember, some liability cases may be settled even before a full-blown case kicks off.
Chip manufacturer Nvidia Corp. Supreme Court victory over investors who accuse the company of downplaying its reliance on the crypto mining market, arguing that a lower court decision allowing the case to move forward "eviscerates the guardrails that Congress erected to protect the public from abusive securities litigation."
and ISE (Trimble’s wholly-owned subsidiary) (Trimble | Plaintiff) offer geofencing and logging technologies along with manufacturing and selling positioning devices. 2] In Burger King , the Court had to decide whether exercising personal jurisdiction over two out-of-state Burger King franchisees would be fair. Trimble, Inc.,
Litigation linked to billionaire Elon Musk sparked several filings in Delaware's Court of Chancery last week, including a call for sanctions and hand-wringing about a proposed multibillion-dollar attorney fee. Other court activity centered on Paramount's proposed $4.5 Other court activity centered on Paramount's proposed $4.5
Brasel of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action against an industrial chemical manufacturer (the "Company"). On September 30, 2021, Judge Nancy E.
Karst — If you monitor Regulations.gov dockets and litigation dockets on PACER like we do, then you know that one company name—more than any other over the past several years—pops up: Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In that case, the DDC recently said : [T]he Court has lingering concerns about whether [Dr. In January 2024, the U.S.
So far, the Supreme Court has not granted certiorari in any patent cases for its 2021-2022 Term. On September 27, 2021, the court is meeting privately for what is known as the “long conference” to decide the fate of the petitions for writ of certiorari that have piled-up over the summer. .” by Dennis Crouch.
Supreme Court involving those chocolate covered bready-sticks. 20-1817 (Supreme Court 2021). . The district court found that the design is functional and therefore not protectable by trademark. ” (product-by-process claim) The district court found the patent relevant to showing functionality. by Dennis Crouch.
It mandates that companies, along with their associated partners in the supply chain, manufacturing, and distribution, must take steps to avoid, halt, or reduce any negative effects they may have on human rights and the environment. This disclosure must adhere to national procedural laws.
Share In the midst of a national opioid crisis that claimed more than 100,000 lives in this country over the past year, the Supreme Court will hear a case on Tuesday about the relevance of doctors’ subjective intentions in criminal prosecutions for unlawful distribution of controlled substances. While on the surface, the case, Ruan v.
District Court for the Central District of California states that the parties “agreed to a settlement in principle and will finalize the outstanding matters before the pretrial conference scheduled for July 16, 2021, with the district judge.” In response to Fashion Nova’s request that the court compel Ms. Versace to testify.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content