This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A US federal appeals court on Friday blocked the Biden Administration from implementing its student loan forgiveness plan known as “SAVE.” ” The decision expands a previous appellate court order that prevented a portion of the program from taking effect.
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] litigation finance boom of the past 20 years—as has been widely reported, private equity now undergirds huge swaths of U.S. Guest post by Jonathan Stroud. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? Colorado courts have a dedicated page for "Efiling for Non-Attorneys" at: [link] There are links to forms and video/written tutorials listed. We share what we found below.
This Litigation Was Pretty Juicy. The plaintiff, who lived in Illinois, sought to pursue claims on behalf of herself and a class of other Illinois-based purchasers, together with those consumers who lived in Arkansas, Iowa, Wyoming, Texas, Nebraska, South Dakota, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Nebraska and Montana. In Cristia v.
If enough broadcasters opt into this agreement, it will end the long-running litigation between GMR and RMLC. See our blog post here with thoughts on some of the considerations that broadcasters should take into account in deciding whether to accept the GMR license agreement.
One Afghanistan-based company sues another in commercial court in Afghanistan. The Afghanistan Supreme Court reverses. It offers insights into best drafting practices for choice-of-court clauses. courts decide whether these clauses should be enforced. Undeterred, NWTC filed suit against RMA in state court in Michigan.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued this three-page decision concluding that because one of the two co-plaintiffs has died, “they can no longer marry, [and] the appeal of the merits judgment is moot.” ” Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the U.S.
1, the Supreme Court agreed to fast-track a challenge , brought by six states, to the Biden administration’s student-loan debt relief program. Six states, led by Nebraska, went to federal court in Missouri to challenge the program. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, which blocked the program. Share On Dec.
Share The Supreme Court will hear back-to-back oral arguments on Feb. The student-loan challenges are the highest-profile cases on the court’s February argument calendar , which was released on Monday morning. Nebraska , brought by six states. Nebraska (Feb. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Nebraska and Department of Education v. Formally, the Supreme Court faces two questions in the pair of cases challenging the Biden administration’s initiative to cancel between $10,000 and $20,000 of federal student-loan indebtedness per borrower. If the answer to the first question is no, the court need not reach the second.
The illegal destruction of disciplinary records can make it harder to hold deputies accountable in a court of law, or track problem officers moving from department to department, said Sam Walker, emeritus professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. We’re not a law enforcement or compliance agency.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. The district court and U.S. What’s the difference ?
Nebraska (1925), the Court struck down a state law prohibiting instruction in German. 2d 772, 784, the court observed: “Nor can we ignore the fact that to bind the disclosure obligation to medical usage is to arrogate the decision on revelation to the physician alone. As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v.
Four years ago, the Supreme Court declined a federal habeas petitioner’s request to review the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Avery v. Justice Kavanaugh, the Sixth Circuit’s assigned circuit justice, attached a “ statement ” to the Supreme Court’s cert. But the Court turned it away. See In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig. ,
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023, [1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation. [2] Nebraska, 600 U.S. 46] The U.S. May 11, 2023). [48] Times , Oct. 12, 2022. [49]
Below is my column in The Hill on reaction to the refusal of the Supreme Court to enjoin the Texas abortion law. The order of the Court expressly did not reach the merits and certainly did not, as claimed, overturn Roe v. promptly declared that the court “ overturned ” Roe v. 1 to demand emergency court intervention.
Investors who want the flexibility to consider all relevant risks to their investments have challenged these rules and laws in court, and, in both state and federal cases, the effort has succeeded. The federal court ruled resoundingly in favor of SIFMA, finding for plaintiffs on all counts.
Share With over 100,000 Americans hospitalized for COVID-19 as a result of the highly contagious Omicron variant, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument Friday in two sets of challenges to the Biden administration’s authority to take action to combat the pandemic. In the first case, National Federation of Independent Business v.
Share The Supreme Court will fast-track a challenge to the Biden administration’s student-debt relief program and hear oral argument in February, the court said Thursday. The $400 billion program will remain on hold in the meantime due to lower-court rulings that have blocked the government from implementing it.
In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.
28, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a pair of challenges to the program. But the court’s decision could also have a legal impact well beyond this case, as the justices weigh issues such as when states can go to court to contest federal policies and how courts should interpret laws giving power to federal agencies.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. Some things are happily left out of the courts. The result is a horn of plenty for litigators. The Golden Ponds restaurant in Greece, New York is still being hit with new cases in the litigation stemming from last year.
Our involvement in this case, Nebraska v. EPA (concerning light- and medium-duty vehicle emission standards), that bring the unique perspective of cities and other local governments before the courts. In Nebraska v. EPA (concerning power plant emissions standards) and Kentucky v.
This blog post explores how the litigation landscape has developed since the SEC proposed the rule, and discusses the implications of several developing cases and doctrines. Together, these matters suggest a volatile litigation landscape that the SEC will have to navigate thoughtfully as it finalizes and defends the climate disclosure rule.
First, from the Washington Post : The Justice Department suspended a veteran lawyer after he said in court that officials mistakenly deported a man to prison in his home country of El Salvador and conceded that he did not know the legal basis for the expulsion. Two headlines for #2. Read more here. Read more here. #3
Share Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will retire from the court at the end of the 2021-22 term, NBC News reported on Wednesday. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. appeals court judge named Ruth Bader Ginsburg to fill White’s seat.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to fill the vacancy left by the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer, he will take his mission to diversify professional representation to the next level, putting a former federal public defender on the highest court in the land. Sentencing Commission. Sentencing Commission.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content