This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to weigh in on the bid for compassionate release by a NewYork man convicted of murder for hire a quarter-century ago. Both denials spurred dissents from the denial of review by some of the courts conservative justices. On Tuesday the court granted review.
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court made short work of two of last weeks first-time relists. The court granted review in United States Postal Service v. The district court agreed and dismissed Whole Foods with prejudice.
Young has been doing well in court and last week he won on additional major issues against CNN. The court found that CNNs retraction was insufficient to remove punitive damages from the table. In my torts class, we discuss retraction statutes and the requirements of time and clarity. I specifically discussed the CNN case.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Courts upcoming conference the second January conference — is ordinarily the justices last opportunity to add new cases to the docket in time for them to review and decide the disputes by the summer recess.
at least in court. After Mark Longo and Daniela Bittner posted cute pictures of Peanut on social media as their companion and friend, NewYork officials from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) raided their home on Oct. Peanut even appeared in my torts class this term, posthumously, of course.
ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. Welcome to the initial biweekly “ScotusCrim” column for SCOTUSblog, which we hope will help fill a gap in Supreme Court coverage. The NewYork Times entitled its review of the term as “A Triumphant Term for Trump.”
This month, there is a new case on the docket after the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith & Wesson Brands v. The First Circuit reversed a trial court that dismissed the case, alleging that the American firearms industry is legally responsible for violence in Mexico. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. I respectfully disagree.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of an innocent Atlanta family, represented by IJ, whose home was mistakenly raided by an FBI SWAT team. So when people exposed to Agent Orange sued Dow in state court, Dow was able to have the case removed to federal court under the federal-officer removal statute.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has relisted for its upcoming conference. So at the last conference, the Supreme Court acted on a ton of relists. White , the court summarily vacated a decision by the U.S. That brings us to this weeks one new relist: Alabama v. California.
Supreme Court. The state's age-verification requirement "imposes a clear burden," the Free Speech Coalition told the Supreme Court, "forcing adult users to incur severe privacy and security risks—which the statute leaves largely unaddressed—before they can access constitutionally protected speech." So, what's headed our way?
Please let me know if you have anything to suggest (though please recall that the brief is aimed at fitting the case within the existing Supreme Court precedents, and not arguing to the Court how existing precedents should be overruled or modified). Interest of the Amicus Curiae Eugene Volokh is the Thomas M. Summary of Argument [1.]
The argument revealed a bench deeply skeptical of the uncertainty maritime insurance contracts would face under a lower-court decision limiting the enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in those contracts. The contract, like most American marine insurance contracts, called for the application of NewYork law. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
Climate change nuisance litigation is entering a new and dynamic phase. Alsup in the federal district court in San Francisco will hear oral argument on motions to dismiss filed in City of Oakland v. Keenan of the Southern District of NewYork will hear oral argument on the motions to dismiss filed in City of NewYork v.
Below is my column in the Hill newspaper on the declaration of a gun violence emergency by NewYork Gov. The centerpiece of Cuomo’s plan is a new law to allow victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers under a nuisance theory. It has failed repeatedly in various states, including NewYork. Andrew Cuomo.
Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The court ruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts. 47 U.S.C. § 230(e)(3).
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , NewYork , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure. Constitution.”
. ‘Transformational Change’ All of these developments were previewed yesterday to members of the media during a briefing by TR executives in the company’s Times Square office in NewYork. ” Requests for analytics, such as “Which law firm has the most torts cases in 2023 so far?”
Claude Cassirer brought suit in federal court in California eighteen years ago against the Thyssen Bornemisza Museum of Madrid, Spain, to recover a painting by Camille Pissarro that was stolen from his grandmother by the Nazis during World War II. It is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog. After a reversal and remand from the U.S.
If untrue, this businessman could face a major defamation action, but Frisch has not indicated whether he will contest the allegation in court. Here is the criminal extortion statute: 18-3-207. Yet, CRS 16-5-401 would seem to set a three-year statute of limitations for extortion cases. In NewYork Times v.
As the conference would highlight on the second day, some legal systems, including Italy, France, and South Korea, which originally refused to recognise foreign decisions on grounds similar to those of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH), have abandoned their strict refusal and adopted a more nuanced approach.
There are 33 states with retraction statutes. The use of the headdress could be treated by a court as opinion since many denounce such images as cultural appropriation. Notably, that article was not on an opinion page, but the court found that the expression of the journalists opinion was obvious from the tenor of the column.
My father’s law office was in rural NewYork, and his core practice involved representing farmers, villages, and small businesses on land transactions, estate planning, and probate matters. The limitations in patent claims aren’t like the boundaries defined in a deed; instead, they are like the elements of a tort.
In January, a group of NewYork state legislators introduced a biometrics regulation bill that contains a private right of action similar to the already enacted Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). First, a California District Court approved Facebook’s $650,000,000 biometrics settlement.
Over the years, I have written repeatedly ( here , here , here , here , and here ) about the interesting defamation case brought by Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, agains the NewYork Times. He has now been reversed again and Palin will have a new opportunity to sue the newspaper.
This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider cases and statutes about suing various government entities, ranging from two counties to a state governor to the United States itself. Waterfront Commission of NewYork Harbor v. Broadly speaking, sovereign immunity protects states from suit.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court has returned from its summer break and gotten down to business. The court agreed to review a dozen petitions from that conference. Several of them are sequels to earlier high court decisions.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court did not grant review in any new cases since our last installment. The court did, however, deny review in one case that had been relisted three times – King v. Cargill , Guedes v.
Court of Restitution, which, in 1954, declared her the rightful owner of the painting. It eventually travelled to NewYork and then to Saint Louis, Missouri, where it remained until 1976. In 2005, after his petition was denied, Claude sued in federal district court in California, where he had lived since 1980.
The NewYork Times lost a critical effort to block the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Alabama basketball player Kai Spears. We have previously discussed retraction statutes that can limit damages or actions. ” The NewYork Times issued a correction, but not a retraction. In NewYork Times v.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. A tort action for intentional infliction of emotional distress is likely to fail. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. However, my students and I often discuss the remarkably wide range of torts that comes with All Hallow’s Eve.
In 2016, the last time Elden recreated the pose as an adult, Elden even t old the NewYork Post that h e wanted to take the shot naked. Pop star Britney Spears , for example, recently compared her treatment under a court-ordered conservatorship to sex trafficking. The remedy should be clear. not unwitting third parties.
Ms Karpik commenced representative proceedings—a class action—in the Federal Court of Australia. These ‘US Terms and Conditions’ included a class action waiver clause, a choice of law clause selecting US maritime law, and an exclusive jurisdiction clause selecting US courts. The ship is registered in Bermuda.
Below is my column in the Hill on NewYork’s latest gun control measure — and the latest challenge to a NewYork law. What is most striking in reviewing the line of gun cases coming out of NewYork is that the Empire State has done more for gun rights than any “pro-gun” state.
United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued a ruling in NewYork to apply Virginia’s choice of law standard that in turn applied California’s defamation laws. He is facing criminal charges in NewYork. In my torts class, I teach defamation and often discuss the California retraction law.
” The legislators lifted the definition from NewYork Times v. Sullivan on defamation to define the element as the statute requires “malice.” 1952), the court considered a “Ladies Home Journal” article that was highly critical of couples who claimed to be cases of “love at first sight.” For example, in Gill v.
There was an interesting torts question raised last week over an abortion rights video ad shared by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Democratic Gov. Macy Petty is a pro-life activist who was falsely portrayed as crying outside of the Supreme Court after its overturning of Roe v. In NewYork Times v. 2d 630 (Cal.
According to the complaint that he filed in a Michigan state court in September 2020, Mr. Moran alleged that in or around 2012, NewYork-based Edie Parker LLC and its founder Brett Heyman (the “defendants”) “began selling high end handbags and accessories patterned after vintage styles favored by Ms. Parker’s estate.
In NewYork Times v. Sullivan , Justice William Brennan wrote for a unanimous court in declaring that the First Amendment required a higher standard of proof for defamation than simple negligence for public officials. Two justices have indicated that they might be open to the idea of revisiting NewYork Times v.
While his public figure standing under NewYork Times v. Note that this provision specifically refers to the third provision specifically cited by Sullivan. They are now suggesting that exceptions to a general rule against paying personal costs of clients are applicable to these payments. I disagree.
The case is brought under statutes like 18 U.S.C. Supreme Court ruled against a provision of federal law that banned computer simulations and virtual pornography under the first amendment. In NewYork Times v. Civil and statutory claims can be curtailed by constitutional limitations. This is such a case in my view.
It is considered a sacrilege to even raise the possibility of reexamining the legacy of NewYork Times v. Here is the column: For those of us who teach torts, we are living in the golden age of defamation. Rakoff might, however, have just created the ideal case for the Supreme Court to change that standard on appeal.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court has 138 cases scheduled for review at this Friday’s conference. The court will likely be paying special attention to three of them, which are this week’s new relists.
chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Pryor was on the short list for the Supreme Court under President Donald Trump. It could be claimed that she became a limited public figure subject to the higher standard of proof in NewYork Times v. However, she later made a comment to media.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content