This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Courts Tie for No. 1 Judicial Hellhole; Cook County, Illinois; California; NewYork City and South Carolina asbestos litigation ranked second through fifth”: Everett Catts of The Daily Report of Fulton County, Georgia has this article. Courts Tie for No. “‘Nuclear Verdicts’ Again Cited as Ga.,
While it has received little coverage in the mainstream media, the conservative group Project Veritas won a major victory against the NewYork Times this week in a defamation case with potentially wide reach. Notably, this follows another significant loss by the NewYork Times to Sarah Palin last year. seven times.
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the Southern District of NewYork’s ruling on Thursday dismissing NewYork City’s suit against Chevron. The suit stems from environmental protection changes that the city has been making since Hurricane Sandy. .”
The prosecution moved to dismiss “in the interest of justice” and a NewYork trial court dismissed the matter. Kavanaugh’s opinion for the court. Kavanaugh began by affirming that precedent from the court and lower courts recognized claims for unreasonable seizure pursuant to legal process under the Fourth Amendment.
Federal law gives the Environmental Protection Agency, not federal courts, the authority to regulate greenhouse emissions in the United States, a federal appeals court ruled…
Climate change nuisance litigation is entering a new and dynamic phase. Alsup in the federal district court in San Francisco will hear oral argument on motions to dismiss filed in City of Oakland v. Keenan of the Southern District of NewYork will hear oral argument on the motions to dismiss filed in City of NewYork v.
Starting in 2017, cities, counties, and states across the United States have filed claims (see here and here ) in state courts against fossil fuel companies seeking redress for the climate harms their products have caused. Many of these cases asserted nuisance and other tort law claims. The Hawai‘i Circuit Court’s decision.
Sarah Palin (R) against the NewYork Times, a lawsuit that could have far reaching implications for defamation law in the United States. The trial concerns an editorial by the NewYork Times where it sought to paint Palin and other Republicans as inciting the earlier shooting. The editorial was grossly unfair.
A NewYork federal court's decision to exclude all plaintiff experts in a multidistrict litigation concerning prenatal exposure to Tylenol highlights a number of expert testimony pitfalls that parties should avoid in product liability and mass tort matters, say Rand Brothers and Courtney Block at Winston & Strawn.
Or do you prefer close-to-home, no-traffic drama and being out of the midst of the major law firms and courts? States with the highest employment levels were Florida, California, Texas, NewYork, and Illinois, with annual wages ranging from $52,100 to $60,390. That will dictate the “where.”
The argument revealed a bench deeply skeptical of the uncertainty maritime insurance contracts would face under a lower-court decision limiting the enforcement of choice-of-law clauses in those contracts. The contract, like most American marine insurance contracts, called for the application of NewYork law. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
For torts scholars, it has been a bonanza of interesting issues touching on every element of defamation law. There is now an important ruling out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that could have enormous implications not just for the media but anyone who retweets stories or claims.
West’s lawyer claims that the producers have committed the tort of false light invasion of privacy by creating a false impression about Mr. West that is highly offensive and injurious to his reputation and have also defamed Mr. West by attributing acts of rage to him that he never committed. In Fairstein v.
United States tests whether the First Amendment requires transparency of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. FISC proceedings are not open to the public, however, and the court rarely publishes its decisions. In October 2016, the ACLU filed a motion seeking access to the court’s opinions and orders from Sept.
Readers of this blog may find particular interested in selected articles, case notes, books review and English translations of court decisions related to private international law. 117(1) of the Child Abduction Convention Implementation Act to a Return Agreement in an In-Court Conciliation (p. 67, 2024) has recently been released.
Below is my column in the Hill newspaper on the declaration of a gun violence emergency by NewYork Gov. The centerpiece of Cuomo’s plan is a new law to allow victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers under a nuisance theory. It has failed repeatedly in various states, including NewYork. Andrew Cuomo.
In the newly-filed suit, Evangelista claims that Delaware-based ZELTIQ is on the hook for products liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and various types of fraud, among other claims, in connection with its willfully “deceptive acts and practices and false and misleading advertising.”
Supreme Court held that the authority of a court to imply a cause of action under Bivens v. While the Court did not overrule Bivens , it did emphasize that recognizing a Bivens cause of action is “a disfavored judicial activity.”. The District Court declined to extend Bivens as re- quested, but the Court of Appeals reversed.
The primary rule for jurisdiction in personam in Indonesia is to sue the defendant in their home court. Similarly, the doctrine of lis alibi pendens is part of Indonesian civil procedure, though rarely used in cases pending in foreign courts between the same parties and subject matter. Pereira (Supreme Court decision 376 K/Pdt.
Supreme Court held that to demonstrate a favorable termination of a criminal prosecution for purposes of the Fourth Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. In January 2014, petitioner Larry Thompson was living with his fiancée (now wife) and their newborn baby in an apartment in Brooklyn, NewYork. Supreme Court’s Decision.
But the bonds include a choice-of-law clause designating the law of NewYork. Does this mean that validity is to be determined under NewYork law? The debt also includes a choice of law clause providing for the application of foreign law, typically that of NewYork or England. Variations in Clause Language.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of NewYork approved a plan that gives individual members of the Sackler Family immunity from civil lawsuits relating to the opioid epidemic. Today Judge Robert Drain of the U.S. Here’s coverage from NPR,
Despite this history, a new decision out of the High Court is still shocking in its implications for further attacks on free speech. The court ruled that newspapers and television stations that post articles on social media sites like Facebook are liable for other third party comments on those posts.
In the first months of 2024, legislators in four states— Maryland , Massachusetts , NewYork , and Vermont —have pushed for legislation that would collectively require large fossil fuel producers and refiners to pay for hundreds of billions of dollars of state-level climate adaptation infrastructure. Constitution.”
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision decades ago in NewYork Times v. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. Obviously, truth remains a defense.
In my torts class, we discuss the often uncertain line between ordinary citizens and public figures. This week, the South Carolina Supreme Court handed down a major ruling in Cruce v. In NewYork Times v. As NewYork Times v. Berkeley County School Dist. Croce sued for $200,000.
There are a number of litigation analytics products on the market, and what they all have in common is that they extract data from court dockets and apply analytics to provide insights into how judges rule in particular times of matters. As it launches to the market, Pre/Dicta provides predictions only for motions to dismiss in federal court.
As the conference would highlight on the second day, some legal systems, including Italy, France, and South Korea, which originally refused to recognise foreign decisions on grounds similar to those of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH), have abandoned their strict refusal and adopted a more nuanced approach. Barnard [1964] AC 1129.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in NewYork Times v. The NewYork Times had run an advertisement referring to abuses of civil rights marchers and the arrest of Martin Luther King Jr. seven times.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision decades ago in NewYork Times v. The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press.
The massive verdict in favor of actor Johnny Depp yesterday constitutes a rare victory of a public figure under the difficult NewYork Times v. Attorneys are protected by absolute privilege in court in making harmful and even false statements. This was a statement made outside of court and subject to defamation challenges.
Maud Maron is a public interest lawyer who is now at the center of a firestorm in NewYork. Then she wrote a column for the NewYork Post criticizing anti-bias training and how difficult such efforts were making it for many to stay in the public schools: “We all want a well-integrated, high-quality public-school system.
Claude Cassirer brought suit in federal court in California eighteen years ago against the Thyssen Bornemisza Museum of Madrid, Spain, to recover a painting by Camille Pissarro that was stolen from his grandmother by the Nazis during World War II. It is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog. After a reversal and remand from the U.S.
. ‘Transformational Change’ All of these developments were previewed yesterday to members of the media during a briefing by TR executives in the company’s Times Square office in NewYork. ” Requests for analytics, such as “Which law firm has the most torts cases in 2023 so far?”
We previously discussed a major ruling restoring the defamation lawsuit of Sarah Palin against the NewYork Times over a false claim related to the shooting of former United States Rep. Now, the NewYork Times is trying to introduce footage of Palin on “The Masked Singer.” Gabrielle Giffords. That decision rests with U.S.
The use of the headdress could be treated by a court as opinion since many denounce such images as cultural appropriation. Notably, that article was not on an opinion page, but the court found that the expression of the journalists opinion was obvious from the tenor of the column. In NewYork Times v. Curtis Publ’g Co.,
Remien : The European Succession Regulation and the many questions of the European court practice – five years after entry into force. but especially national court practice shows many interesting cases of the necessary overall assessment. The article pleads for an equilibrated multilateral approach. The long-awaited U.S.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). West Virginia Federal Court Ordered EPA to Evaluate Clean Air Act’s Impacts on Coal Industry.
My father’s law office was in rural NewYork, and his core practice involved representing farmers, villages, and small businesses on land transactions, estate planning, and probate matters. The limitations in patent claims aren’t like the boundaries defined in a deed; instead, they are like the elements of a tort.
West has now won a major verdict in NewYork and $500,000 in damages. ” The court noted that Wagner submitted an affidavit “in which he essentially denied that the conversation described by Lo Duca had ever occurred.” Due to a default judgment on liability, it was the ultimate “back door slider.”
United States District Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge John Gallagher (E.D. In NewYork Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court crafted the actual malice standard that required public figures to shoulder the higher burden of proving defamation. There is an interesting ruling in Amor v.
In January, a group of NewYork state legislators introduced a biometrics regulation bill that contains a private right of action similar to the already enacted Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). First, a California District Court approved Facebook’s $650,000,000 biometrics settlement.
If untrue, this businessman could face a major defamation action, but Frisch has not indicated whether he will contest the allegation in court. In NewYork Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court crafted the actual malice standard that required public figures to shoulder the higher burden of proving defamation.
The Supreme Court has given the press added “breathing room” with the higher standard of proof found in cases such as NewYork Times v. ” The Court must look to each of the statements in the context of the entire broadcast or social media post to assess the construction placed upon it by the average viewer.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
189 
Let's personalize your content