This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oregon filed a lawsuit against the city of Medford, Oregon, on Tuesday, alleging that the city’s law enforcement authorities have been surveilling and illegally gathering information on the complainants for years. Police continued to monitor protests against the overturning of Roe v.
Oregon Supreme Court takes a stab at it; Oregon asserted that a state statute prevents probationers from owing kitchen knife blocks — depending on the size of the blades in the block.” The Supreme Court of Oregon has posted the video of today’s oral argument online at this link.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this decision overturning the conviction, holding that federal prosecutors had improperly “assimilated into federal criminal law Oregon’s unlawful use of a weapon statute” to apply to a a road rage incident on a highway in the Warm Springs Indian Reservation in central Oregon.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday issued orders from its so-called “long conference” – the justices’ private conference in the last week of September, at which they met for the first time since the end of June to add new cases to their docket. The trial court rejected that argument, and the California Court of Appeals agreed.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, First Amendment challenges to the use of membership fees by a union or bar association to engage in political speech, as well as the definition of a state “tax” under the federal Tax Injunction Act. Oregon State Bar.
and Quicksilver Contracting Company, the OregonCourt of Appeals reversed the dismissal of the plaintiff's "aiding and abetting" discrimination and retaliation claim. On June 23, 2021, in Charlton v. Ed Staub and Sons Petroleum, Inc.
The district court in Oregon in 2016 seemed to favor such a right, but a divided Ninth Circuit concluded in 2020 that the plaintiffs lacked standing. The plaintiffs are now back in the district court seeking much more modest relief.). The court found that this would violate the political question doctrine.
Using the enforcement tools – particularly the higher fines – authorized by the PIRATE Act passed by Congress in 2020, the FCC proposed a to impose a fine of $2,316,034 on one alleged operator of a pirate radio station in the New York City area, and a fine of $80,000 fine on another operator of a pirate station in Oregon.
Singh , in which the court will consider what kind of notice the government must provide before a noncitizen can be deported for not appearing in court. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. Garland and Garland v. Under 8 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Four years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Nieves v. This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, how closely aligned evidence must be to satisfy that exception.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
Supreme Court returned from recess on January 4, 2024. The Court’s January session will feature some of the Term’s biggest cases, with several testing the limit of the federal government’s regulatory power. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Federal Bureau of Investigation v. In Siegel v. I, § 8, Cl.
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Second, the court concluded that BLM should have calculated and considered total greenhouse emissions, instead of merely relying on comparisons of yearly emission rates.
These permitting decisions may then subject transmission lines to NEPA, among other statutes. . In May, the Court modified its earlier vacatur of NWP 12 to cover only future oil and gas pipeline construction. The Corps appealed the District Court’s amended ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it. FEATURED CASE. A divided D.C. DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain court rules on retirement.”. Review Active Cases and Address Pending Court Dates. Prior to retirement, lawyers need to deal with open cases, pending court dates, and active client files.
States such as Ohio, Virginia, Illinois, California, Florida Georgia , Texas, Arizona, and Oregon have emerged as major data center hubs and are now faced with the challenge of upgrading their grids to bring more electricity to them. In this regard, the Supreme Court of Ohio has held that R.C. where data center growth is concentrated.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. million acres – of federally owned forest in Oregon, with instructions to ensure both a “permanent forest” and an economic benefit to local residents. The Oregon district court rejected the timber company’s challenge.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Claudia Delgadillo (‘‘Delgadillo’’) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. USITC received a complaint filed on September 15, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Pratum Farm, LLC of Salem, Oregon. DOC announced on October 9, 2019, in the U.S.
Share The Supreme Court will hear arguments in January in a pair of cases asking the justices to overrule a landmark decision on deference to federal administrative agencies. Raimondo headline the calendar for the January argument session , which the court released on Friday morning. The question before the court in FBI v.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Before we discuss changes to the Supreme Court’s docket this week, a word about last week’s post. The court wound up taking both the case brought by two school board members, O’Connor-Ratcliff v. 3553(a).
What I did learn was how to look up statutes and cases. So we did get kind of a field trip and we got to go to the law library and look up statutes and codes and case law. My most memorable trial moment would be last year we were in Medford, Oregon, for a May trial that was out there and we were all in the courtroom.
Supreme Court precedent, the California Supreme Court today holds in People v. Catarino that a statute requiring full-term consecutive prison sentences for certain sex crimes found by a judge to have been committed “on separate occasions” does not offend the Sixth Amendment jury trial right. Applying U.S.
Then, in 2009 , the California Supreme Court ruled that the callousness of the original crime couldn’t be a parole board’s sole criterion for denying a person freedom. There’s no rationale between what he did then and his current dangerousness, that’s why we have the youth offender statute,” Shaddow said. “We
There is a new ruling out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that could be headed for a major showdown in the Supreme Court. Elenis could force a hitherto evasive Court to rule directly on the conflict between anti-discrimination laws and the religious clauses. The decision in 303 Creative LLC v.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Two of the relisted cases involve an issue sufficiently important that the court already came close to granting it in Trump v. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected St.
The New Transparency Rules and the El Salvador Detention Agreement; A 2022 statute could force disclosure of any U.S.-El Appeals court panel hears arguments on APs access to White House; A three-judge panel was skeptical of arguments that the administration is facing imminent harm: Hassan Ali Kanu of Politico has this report.
Share Something on television last night seems to have stolen the attention from the Supreme Court in its end-of-term push. When the court takes the bench, Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in City of Grants Pass v. It’s the Wildlife Service and not any court that knows about” the intricacies of squirrel populations, she says.
A panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seemed to be channeling the lyrics of the musical Hamilton in noting that “Everything is legal in New Jersey.” ” That issue came up in the Oregon case of Anita Green. 31, 2016, 12:30 PM), [link]. He was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Carlos T.
In my view, the court missed the mark, in the main. But in this blog post, I unpack an aspect of the decision where I think it was more of a mixed bag: the court’s treatment of the international air pollution provision of the Clean Air Act, Section 115. On this point, the court was absolutely correct. Alternatively, the U.S.
The US Supreme Court released orders Friday and Monday after its September “long conference.” ” The court granted certiorari for 12 cases Friday and two cases Monday for its Winter term, to be argued in January or February. The court also granted dozens of procedural orders in other ongoing cases.
Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. Supreme Court. On October 2, the district court granted the companies’ motion to temporarily extend its stay of the remand order until the Supreme Court resolves the application.
In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that young people and other plaintiffs asserting a claim against the federal government for infringement of a Fifth Amendment due process right to a “ climate system capable of sustaining human life” did not have Article III standing. One reason the petitioners asked the D.C.
In Portland, Oregon, Chester Hester, 24, Nicole Noriega, 38, and Bailey Willack, 23, allegedly spent Thanksgiving morning vandalizing business by smashing windows and spray-painting graffiti on banks and other businesses. The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations.
Portland, Oregon. Source: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives. Oregon Supreme Court Said Public Trust Doctrine Did Not Impose Obligation to Protect Resources from Climate Change. A trial court had interpreted the scope more narrowly.) By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. FEATURED CASE.
In Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies, Supreme Court Held that Appellate Review of Remand Order Extends to All Grounds for Removal. The Court declined to review the companies’ other grounds for removal, finding that the “wiser course” was to allow the Fourth Circuit to address them in the first instance.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. The court therefore vacated and remanded the ACE Rule—which repealed the 2015 Clean Power Plan rule and in its place adopted a replacement rule that relied only on heat-rate improvements at individual plants. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Third, the D.C. American Lung Association v.
The second lawsuit was filed more than two years later by California, Oregon, and Minnesota. District Court in the District of Columbia ultimately concluded that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the EO. Trump , the court (Judge Randolph D. The court did, however, allow the organizations to amend their complaint.
As long as the harm isnt something specifically covered by precedent, the general feeling of courts is that law enforcement shouldnt be punished for rights violations they can plausibly (at least under precedent) claim they had no idea were rights violations, no matter how immediately egregious those rights violations were.
Louisiana Federal Court Blocked Biden Administration “Pause” on New Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the Biden administration from implementing a “Pause” on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters.
Similarly, other state constitutions may allow for the enactment of some, or even all, statutes based on the outcome of a popular vote. Let me be clear and underscore before continuing that the prevailing economic and political arrangements of democracy are more than a matter of individual agency or politicians doing the morally right thing.
Supreme Court seeking review of the D.C. Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. The states argued that the Supreme Court’s stay of the Clean Power Plan while it was under review by the D.C. FEATURED CASE. States and Coal Company Sought Review of D.C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content