Remove Court Remove Statute Remove Utah
article thumbnail

Utah governor vetoes bill with potential to undermine judicial independence

JURIST

Utah Governor Spencer Cox on Tuesday vetoed Senate Bill 296, a bill that would have granted him the power to appoint the chief justice of the Utah Supreme Court every four years. Presently, the members of the Utah Supreme Court have an exclusive say on who becomes the chief justice.

Statute 104
article thumbnail

Utah Supreme Court decided constitutional right to reform government in response to gerrymandering

JURIST

In a unanimous decision, the Utah Supreme Court decided Thursday that Utah citizens have a constitutional right to reform their government in response to past redistricting efforts to divide Salt Lake City into four congressional districts, resulting in Republicans winning by a large margin.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Justices validate IRS’s right to retain fraudulent pre-bankruptcy tax payments

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court held last week that the answer is yes. For Jackson, the key to the case is the reality that under Utah law (the applicable fraudulent conveyance statute), the creditors of the failed business could not recover from the IRS, because the IRSs sovereign immunity would protect it from a suit under the Utah statute.

Statute 62
article thumbnail

Utah Groups Can't Scrap Corporate Transparency, US Says

Law 360

A Utah federal court hasn't seen sufficient evidence to block the Corporate Transparency Act's disclosure requirements in presentations by an off-the-grid community, an online meat market and a trade group for cattle producers that have sued over the statute, the federal government said.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Utah Biz Groups Latest To Challenge Corp. Disclosure Law

Law 360

Several small-business associations in Utah became the latest group to challenge the Corporate Transparency Act's disclosure requirements, telling a federal court Monday the statute violates several constitutional provisions, including the guarantee of due process.

article thumbnail

Ohio Supreme Court rules judges not required to defer to state agency interpretations of ambiguous laws

JURIST

The Ohio Supreme Court Thursday ruled that Ohio courts do not have to defer to a state agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous law. The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas reversed the Board’s decision without affording any deference to the agency’s interpretation of the relevant statute.

article thumbnail

California’s Chief Justice Faults Legislature and Lawyer Lobbying for Blocking Movement on Regulatory Reforms

LawSites

The chief justice of the California Supreme Court, Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye , said that the state legislature is to blame for stalling efforts to bring about regulatory reforms to address the state’s gap in access to justice. Every year, the bar dues bill has to be approved by the California legislature, not the Supreme Court.

Lawyer 98