Remove Court Remove Statute Remove West Virginia
article thumbnail

The morning read for Tuesday, August 22

SCOTUSBlog

Share Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.

Statute 96
article thumbnail

Court schedules February argument session

SCOTUSBlog

In May 2022, a divided Supreme Court put the Texas law on hold while the challenges to the law continued in the lower courts. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit later rejected those challenges and upheld the law, while the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit barred the state from enforcing most of the law.

Court 110
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Compassionate-release, the First Step Act, and jurors on social media

SCOTUSBlog

When Allen Loughry II, the former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, was convicted of wire and mail fraud in 2018, discussion about the case, predictably, spread on Twitter. The district court and the U.S. The court clarified one provision of the law last term in Terry v. In Loughry v.

Statute 102
article thumbnail

Justices take up Native health care funding cases and a dispute over sentencing guide

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning added two additional hours of argument, in cases involving federal funding of health care services for Native Americans and the Armed Career Criminal Act, to its docket for the 2023-24 term. The court designated six cases as bellwether cases. And in Erlinger v.

article thumbnail

More Venue and Corporate Games: This time with ANDA filing

Patently O

The 2017 Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland gave renewed teeth to the venue statute governing litigation. Here, Mylan created its ANDA documents at its West Virginia office and submitted them electronically from that location. This argument was quickly rejected by the court. (2) Celgene Corp.

Statute 95
article thumbnail

D.C. Circuit Sides with Manufacturers in Latest 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

FDA Law Blog

Kirschenbaum — Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act does not prohibit pharmaceutical manufacturers from imposing conditions on the distribution of discounted drugs to covered entities in the program. By Sophia R. Gaulkin & Alan M.

article thumbnail

Beards and Brady (i.e., religious freedom and criminal procedure)

SCOTUSBlog

In district court, Georgia corrections admitted that its policy substantially burdened Smith’s religious exercise, but it argued that various safety and security concerns justified its refusal to allow beards of any greater length. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reversed , re-instating the half-inch limit.

Diligence 100