This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Georgia Supreme Court this week issued a decision holding that the streaming of pre-1972 sound recordings by iHeart Media does not violate the state’s criminalstatutes against the “transfer” of recorded sounds without the permission of the owner of the master recording.
As recounted earlier , in 2008, Tarahrick Terry, then in his early 20s, was arrested in Florida for carrying just under 4 grams of crack cocaine. The crack-cocaine disparity had largely come to symbolize an ineffective and counter-productive war on drugs and a racist criminallaw system. He was charged under 21 U.S.C. §
There is an interesting criminal case out of Florida in which FedEx driver Latavion Lewis was charged with grand theft, illegal dumping, and an organized scheme to defraud. FedEx received reports of packages strewn along roads and in the woods around Bonifay, Florida. ” Roughly44 packages were recovered as of December 21.
For years, we have been following the bizarre murder-for-hire case involving the fatal shooting of Florida State University law professor Daniel Markel. Adelson and Markel married in 2006 when she was a third-year law student at the University of Miami and he was a criminallaw professor at FSU.
But even if the definition were not clear, the 5th Circuit continued, bump stocks should be excluded from the definition of “machinegun” under the rule of lenity, a doctrine that instructs courts to apply ambiguous criminallaws in the way that is most favorable to defendants. The 6th Circuit ruled that the regulation is ambiguous.
This law was part of the Howell Code , a comprehensive set of laws enacted by the territory’s First Legislative Assembly, encompassing procedural regulations and establishing criminallaws ranging from bigamy to duels to mayhem. Though Planned Parenthood initially lost, the case was revived after the passage of Roe v.
Although these justifications are often framed as “common sense,” they ignore the fact that both civil and criminallaws already protect such places. The framing of the issue that [cisgender] women’s safety and trans rights are mutually exclusive advances a false narrative for two big reasons.
Oklahoma that Congress had not clearly disestablished a Creek Nation reservation covering much of eastern Oklahoma, and thus the area remained Native American territory for the purposes of a federal criminallaw, eliminating the state’s ability to prosecute crimes there. Florida , 21-53. relisted after the Oct. 10, and Jan.
The Article I Appropriations Clause prohibits any Executive Branch official from disbursing funds except as provided by an act of Congress, and no statute authorizes this giveaway of the public’s money,” Larkin Jr. Reviving the practice would violate the Article I Appropriations Clause and a statute known as the McDade Amendment, Larkin Jr.
It is a curious call for a governor to make after he ran ads in Florida calling on people to “join us in California.” to be charged criminally for transporting 36 people to Sacramento. California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) chimed in, declaring the flight from Florida might be “ State-sanctioned kidnapping.”
Florida Southern District Court. Giuffre insists that Prince Andrew is not covered in the agreement, which was connected to the controversial resolution of the charges in Florida against Epstein. ” That does create a credible threshold defense and a tough question for the court. .
Trump’s counsel challenged several phrases within the criminalstatute he is charged under. The vagueness doctrine is a constitutional doctrine which requires that criminallaws explicitly state and define the type of conduct being punished.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The cases from injuries last year are just now being filed under the statute of limitations, but it has been another bumper crop of Thanksgiving torts. Macy’s Parade also did not disappoint with its balloon-related mishaps.
District Judge Tanya Chutkan, originally scheduled for March 4 but now on hold, can go forward, but also whether the former president’s trials in Florida and Georgia can proceed. To the contrary, a bedrock principle of our constitutional order is that no person is above the law — including the President.” before U.S.
Those appellate issues include charges based on a novel criminal theory through which New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg not only zapped a dead misdemeanor into life (after the expiration of the statute of limitation) but based a state charge on federal election law and federal taxation violations. to the White House.
The national debate on historical racism in our criminal punishment system? Related questions of how we address drug use with our criminallaw rather than as a public health issue? That tier is defined in subparagraph (B) of the statute.) Undoubtedly. Redemption after committing a crime? Goes without saying.
It may foreshadow an equally historic trial in the Florida courthouse. A speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment − and a federal statute − would set the case for trial within 70 days. However, criminal defendants routinely waive the right to a speedy trial because it does not allow them to fully prepare for trial.
Below is my column in the New York Post on the vicious attacks being directed at Judge Aileen Cannon as she addresses pre-trial motions in the Florida prosecution of former president Donald Trump. Attorneys be appointed under statute or nominated by the president (and confirmed by the Senate). That’s been addressed in multiple courts.
Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges related to mishandling classified White House documents that were recovered at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.” Smith is now left in a battle not with Trump but time.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content