Remove Criminal Law Remove Illinois Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Justices to decide what it means to “use” a locomotive

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court is poised to decide yet another case involving one of the many federal statutes that govern the nation’s railroads and railworkers. The court will hear argument on Monday in LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Company , a case about the scope of the Locomotive Inspection Act.

Statute 100
article thumbnail

The long conference’s relists

SCOTUSBlog

Criminal law We are now in the home stretch. Beginning in March 2013, Michael Johnson, a state prisoner in Illinois convicted of murder, was held in solitary confinement for over three years. A divided panel of the 6th Circuit affirmed, holding that application of nonmutual offensive collateral estopposel was permissible.

Tort 122
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Too Clever By Half: Why Public Nuisance is Again at the Heart of a Public Health Debate

JonathanTurley

The company and the Oklahoma justices are right on the law. Public nuisance was originally addressed in England by criminal laws against such offenses as obstructing “the King’s highways.” It has limits, however—most notably the standard statute of limitations, which commonly range from one to four years. In Chicago v.

Tort 41
article thumbnail

Protection, Punishment, and the Victims Rights Movement

The Crime Report

Meanwhile, states like New York , Illinois , Nevada , and California have extended their statute of limitations on a wide range of sex crimes that expand the window for survivors to take legal action against their attackers and receive justice. That problem also extends to the statute of limitations for sex offenders.

Statute 98