This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether defendants have standing to assert violations of an extradition treaty and whether the wire fraud statute applies extraterritorially to reach a defendant’s conduct committed only in Nigeria. Ojedokun v.
In three of the past four terms, the Supreme Court has rejected broad readings of white-collar criminallaws urged by the federal government. Those decisions concerned conduct ranging from wire and computer fraud to tax violations. In 2004, Congress passed sentencing enhancements meant to crack down on this growing issue.
Both cases arise under the federal firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § Enacted by Congress in 1994, Section 922(g)(8) criminalizes gun ownership by anyone subject to a domestic-violence restraining order. The challenge to the domestic-violence ban comes from Zackey Rahimi of Arlington, Texas. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
Newsom cited the kidnapping statute but apparently failed to read it or the underlying cases. While there is a fair debate over the policy of relocation by states like Texas and Florida, the effort to use the criminal process as part of that political debate is … well, pathetic.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in the case of a 76-year-old Texas woman , Sylvia Gonzalez, who was arrested on charges that she had violated a state law that prohibits tampering with government records. The post Texas city council member argues retaliatory arrest appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , which focus on statute of limitations and personal jurisdiction issues. In Reed , petitioner Rodney Reed asked the court to decide when “the statute of limitations begins to run for an action under 42 U.S.C. The US Supreme Court Monday granted certiorari to two cases, Reed v.
In his dissent, Circuit Judge Amul Roger Thapar wrote the reasons ban should have been upheld because “its causation requirement – ‘because of’ mirrors scores of federal and state statutes. Indeed, hundreds of criminallaws have exactly the same causation requirement…Are they all now up for grabs?”.
However, after the industrial revolution [and the rise of] the English working classes, there just weren’t enough police to keep whacking people over the head with the criminallaw. Today, one out of every three adults in this country has a criminal or arrest history of some kind.
Sylvia Gonzalez, a newly elected Texas city council member elected on an anti-corruption platform was arrested after her first meeting for “intentionally … conceal[ing] … a government record,” for allegedly taking a petition her supporters had presented to the mayor seeking the removal of a city manager. Gonzalez v. relisted after the Sept.
Now, federal Judge Michael Truncale (left) has issued a preliminary injunction in the Eastern District of Texas to stop the prosecution of the company. I previously wrote a column opposing calls by GOP members for a federal investigation of Netflix and the movie “Cuties” (or Mignonnes). 3d 874, 880 (5th Cir. 2018) (quoting Younger, 401 U.S.
Professors of Second Amendment law and the Bay Colony Weapons Collectors argue that the founders deliberately broadened English gun rights, which, The Firearms Policy Coalition at George Mason University writes, already provided for the right to carry a weapon in public for self-defense. Views Of The Framers. Self-Defense.
Oklahoma that Congress had not clearly disestablished a Creek Nation reservation covering much of eastern Oklahoma, and thus the area remained Native American territory for the purposes of a federal criminallaw, eliminating the state’s ability to prosecute crimes there. Brackeen , 21-377 , Texas v. Texas , 21-5050.
Hunter Biden has been arguing against the position of his father’s administration and adopting the same argument of the National Rifle Association (NRA) in challenging the constitutionality of the law. (AP The Court found the federal statutes imposing a reasonable temporary limitation on this right. for that period. Roberts Jr.
These laws are based on an urban legend that people are routinely prosecuted for defending their homes from intruders. The laws have produced perverse results as in the controversial case of Tom Horn in Texas. I do not believe that Maryland has a specific Castle Doctrine statute. ” The rule is.
In Texas v. For we are presented with a clear and simple statute to be judged against a pure command of the Constitution. As a result, the woman could received up to a year in prison or a fine of up to $2,500. The case run afoul of the First Amendment and controlling precedent in my view. Johnson , 491 U.S.
The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. The cases from injuries last year are just now being filed under the statute of limitations, but it has been another bumper crop of Thanksgiving torts. Macy’s Parade also did not disappoint with its balloon-related mishaps.
Under the 2018 rule, anyone who owned or possessed a bump stock was required either to destroy them or turn them over to the ATF to avoid criminal penalties. Michael Cargill, the owner of a Texas gun store, surrendered his bump stocks but also went to federal court, seeking to have the rule thrown out.
These cases reflect the judiciarys ongoing role in interpreting federal statutes, balancing individual rights against governmental power, and resolving contentious social and political questions. EL Paso County , which examined Fourth Amendment protections in the context of abusive strip searches, and Texas v. Other Areas: 15 points.
Here is the column: This week Texas Rangers infielder Brock Holt became a baseball legend when he went to the mound and threw an “eephus,” a high-arching, off-speed pitch, in a game against the Athletics. For many individuals, the statute of limitations may have passed on any alleged crimes. for good reason.
Jackson also inquired about the potential impact of a ruling on the statute of limitations and how courts should approach medical expertise when evaluating agency decisions, especially regarding the safety and efficacy of drugs. Paxton The case examines whether Texas’s H.B.
Texas, Becerra v. Ross (2022) focused on economic regulations, examining securities fraud and state agricultural laws impact on interstate commerce. Texas (2021) and Ohio v. Texas (2022), she emphasized deferring to lower courts, criticizing the Courts rushed timeline and its adoption of an untested jurisdictional theory.
Rather, as some of us previously argued, the Court ruled that this is a habeas case that should be heard in Texas. However, for some of us, this seemed like an odd habeas action where jurisdiction should reside in Texas. The Court ruled, “The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia.”
Trevino , the court held in favor of Sylvia Gonzalez, who had been arrested in Castle Hills, Texas in 2019 on a trumped-up charge of tampering with government records. In Gonzalez v. She had briefly misplaced a petition on a table at a public meeting.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content