This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) Tuesday ruled that Germany’s dataretentionstatute is not compatible with EU law. The TGK law imposed an obligation on telecom operators to retain customers’ traffic data for 10 weeks and location data for four weeks. .”
The Ninth Circuit refused Wednesday to revive allegations that Google and Apple violated state privacy laws in New York and Minnesota by retaining data about consumers' streaming video rentals, finding that the state statutes don't create a private right of action for the purported data-retention violations.
Net Choice in 2024 clarifying the standard for analyzing a facial challenge to a statute under the First Amendment. California appealed that injunction to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While that appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Moody v.
established by statute and case law. The increased number of reports would likely swamp FDA’s datasystems, creating even more signal to noise than already exists. This fraudulent inducement theory is well?established Note the vagueness of the regulatory standard in the first place.
Once FDA has cleared or approved a PCCP, that statute states that a supplemental application “shall not be required” to make a change consistent with such PCCP.
The statute achieves this through disclosure of information by the software manufacturer about the “basis for” the recommendations made by the software. FDA’s novel reading of Criterion 3 may dramatically affect the regulatory status of CDS software that includes risk probabilities or risk scores as outputs.
We only share information with internal authorization as our investigations are confidential under our governing statute,” said a securities regulator in North America. “We The definitions ranged from better data mapping and improved remote access to increased automation and effective datamanagement.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content