This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A new legalresearch service has quietly launched, targeting bar associations and 1-2 lawyer law firms, but what is not obvious from the service’s website is that the company behind it was formed as a subsidiary of RELX, the parent company of LexisNexis. Legal InQuery Solutions was incorporated in Delaware on Nov.
A federal judge in Delaware has dismissed the claim by now-shuttered legalresearch startup ROSS Intelligence that Thomson Reuters violated federal antitrust law by unlawfully tying its search tool to its public law database in order to maintain its dominance in the overall market for legal search platforms.
It has been a while since I have written about the copyright lawsuit by legalresearch giant Thomson Reuters against the no-shuttered legalresearch startup Ross Intelligence, in which TR alleges that Ross stole copyright content from Westlaw to build its own completing legalresearch product.
But ROSS countered that the databases TR maintains of public law and its legal search tools are, in fact, separate products, and that TR conditions access to the databases on purchase of the search tools. district judge in Delaware but who last month became a judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit — sided with ROSS.
“Your affiant has never utilized Chat GPT as a source for conducting legalresearch prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false,” his affidavit said. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. Technology Incompetence?
s 2022 battle with Elon Musk over his $44 billion acquisition bid, after a legalresearch website challenged the ongoing confidential treatment of the Delaware Chancery Court filings. has a little over a week to prepare public versions of sealed court documents from Twitter Inc.'s
The founder of a legalresearch site that makes government documents public has petitioned Delaware's Court of Chancery to sanction Elon Musk, his X entities and his counsel after a court clerk allegedly removed, at the request of attorneys for the billionaire, a document filed in Twitter Inc.'s
The Michigan Courts have their self-represented litigants page at: [link] It also provides links to the Michigan Legal Help website at: [link] And interestingly, the court has created a "Learning Center" as a resource for educators around the state. Interactive Forms and online legalresearch are also available.
The Delaware District Court’s Ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment in the case of Thomson Reuters v. Ross was a legalresearch AI startup. (I Ross hired a subcontractor to create memos with legal questions and answers. These are the basic facts underlying this lawsuit.
Say the USA were divided between California and Delaware. million would ALWAYS beat out Delaware with its population of 967,171. So, why would anyone in humble Delaware ever go out to vote if they knew they would always lose to mighty California? Might makes right, right? But, let's put this in perspective.
Target customer: All size of law firms such as DLA Piper, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Three Crowns; legal departments of corporates such as Iberdrola; governments including Japan, Costa Rica, Egypt, and Ghana; and top-rated universities like Harvard University, University of Cambridge, and Sorbonne Université. Traction: Revenue: $360K.
Target customer: All size of law firms such as DLA Piper, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Three Crowns; legal departments of corporates such as Iberdrola; governments including Japan, Costa Rica, Egypt, and Ghana; and top-rated universities like Harvard University, University of Cambridge, and Sorbonne Université. Traction: Revenue: $360K.
Stephanos Bibas, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware. As at least some readers will realize, the plaintiff in the case is the owner of Westlaw, one of the leading legalresearch platforms. Penning the opinion? None other than the Third Circuits Hon. Ross Intelligence does not disappoint.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content