This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” Additionally, that court brushed aside a divided First District, Division Three, opinion ( Campaign for Quality Education v. .” ” Additionally, that court brushed aside a divided First District, Division Three, opinion ( Campaign for Quality Education v. Facebook discrimination case can continue. ” ( Id.
” The trial court had dismissed the action on demurrer, ruling that one superior court cannot direct a writ of mandamus to another superior court. ” Horvitz & Levy represents the Regents and other defendants in the Supreme Court.
Illuminate Education. The business, which got the private information to assist the school and evaluate the student’s educational progress, also allegedly delayed for five months before giving notice of the data breach. Confidential medical records : The court granted review in J.M.
In an unpublished opinion , the Second District, Division Five, held the superior court improperly bounced at the demurrer stage a lawsuit by students at University of California schools claiming they should get refunds of tuition and fees paid for times when instruction was remote rather than in-person because of the COVID pandemic.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content