Remove Demurrer Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Boohoo Group Says it Has Reached a Preliminary Settlement in Case Over “Fraudulent” Reference Pricing

The Fashion Law

The statutes that the plaintiffs rely on, including California Business and Professions Code section 17501 – the statute upon which their false advertising claims are based on – “unconstitutionally regulate free speech.” . The Defendants’ Answers. The Free Speech Argument. The cases are Farid Khan, et. Boohoo, et.

Statute 64
article thumbnail

A double conference with no straight grants, but some significant denials

At the Lectern

The disputed issue concerns the RJA statement that “racism in any form or amount, at any stage of a criminal trial, is intolerable, inimical to a fair criminal justice system, is a miscarriage of justice under Article VI of the California Constitution, and violates the laws and Constitution of the State of California.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Gang enhancements, union protections, racially biased prosecutions, the Second Amendment, Michael Jackson, and more at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

The legislation amended the law regarding gang enhancements. The court wants a Court of Appeal opinion on the constitutionality of a state statute barring public employers from discouraging union membership. He argued that the statute criminalizing his conduct violates the Second Amendment. ” (Link added.) Michael Jackson.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide who sets salaries for retirement board employees

At the Lectern

The Second District, Division Seven, Court of Appeal’s published opinion framed the issues this way: “does the fiduciary board of a county public employee retirement system established under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq. ” and “does section 31522.1 Franco (2024) 99 Cal.App.5th

Court 45