This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
You work to represent plaintiffs in mass tort, personal injury, and employment lawsuits, but defendants can have what feels like an endless coffer of resources to shut down your client’s case. Pretrial discovery activities, like depositions, are weighed against the case-value benefit.
11] This means that in order to perfect a security interest in Bitcoin, a lender would file a UCC financing statement in the correct jurisdiction in order to put other potential lenders on notice of the secured party’s interest in that wallet. [12] 1] See David Gerard, El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law Is a Farce , Foreign Policy: Analysis (Sept.
Defendant signed both his own name and plaintiff’s name on the check, then deposited the proceeds into a joint account he shared with his then wife. In 2012, defendant submitted a form surrendering the annuity, and a check was made payable to plaintiff and defendant. Code Ann. § 47-3-118(g). “In internal citation omitted).
Target customer: Lexamica works with all sizes of law firms from large plaintiff firms in single event mass torts to solos who need access to a trustworthy network of peers to refer cases to. As our customer base grows and our product expands, we will seek further venture financing to fuel our growth. 50+ depositions on the calendar.
As discussed below, those concerns were magnified by Morris’s recent deposition where he seemed to struggle to separate matters falling under his roles as friend, donor, investor, and lawyer. These business interests appear to have arisen after Morris delved into his client’s finances as his counsel. Rule 1.8.5(b)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content