Conflict of Laws

MAY 20, 2024

Introduction After extensive negotiations, on 24 April 2024, the European Parliament approved the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or CS3D) as part of the EU Green Deal. A similar provision to that effect can be found in the draft UN Legally Binding Instrument on business and human rights.

Diligence 80

Diligence Litigation Litigating Laws 80

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 3, 2023

The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. Sommerfeld ) The Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence The process towards an EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is gaining momentum.

Drafting 52

Drafting Diligence Procedural Law Court 52

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 2, 2022

On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published its proposal of a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDD) in respect to human rights and the environment. For those interested, there are many contributions available online, namely in the Oxford Business Law Blog, which dedicates a whole series to it ( here ).

Drafting 40

Drafting Diligence Laws Procedural Law 40

Conflict of Laws

MAY 17, 2024

by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. 30] Draft Statutory Instruments 2024 No. Regulations 2024 (“Draft Guidelines”). Court of Session). [35]

Drafting 64

Drafting Government Legal Legal 64

LexForti

NOVEMBER 5, 2021

Keywords- Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Procedure Code 1908. The principle followed in Civil Procedural Law is that the Court procedures and rules are designed to achieve substantial justice. Introduction. They cannot be changed except for the Judge’s discretion and the trial proceeds only within the pleadings made.

Diligence 52

Diligence Cause of Action Court Litigation 52

Conflict of Laws

MAY 26, 2021

First, Shell stated that the claimants abused procedural law, because the claims against Royal Dutch Shall were ‘obviously bound to fail and for that reason could not serve as a basis for jurisdiction as provided in art. 6a, enabling a choice of law for victims of business-related human rights violations. 7(1) DCCP’ (at [3.1]

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigating Laws Court 52