This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Additionally, the Opinion emphasizes lawyers’ duties under other ethics rules regarding competence, diligence, candor to the tribunal, and avoidance of frivolous filings. As a result, some copying from secondary sources or prior briefs furthers clients’ interests in efficiency. ” Likewise, in American Institute of Physics v.
“Our department understands the tremendous responsibility it has to investigate reported crimes diligently and in a timely manner,” Herold said. An investigation into allegations against eight officers at Golden Valley Police Department in Minnesota led to the firing of one officer and investigation of seven others.
Minnesota Court of Appeals Upheld State Approvals for Enbridge Crude Oil Replacement Pipeline. Minnesota v. California Coastal Commission , No. D076956 (Cal. June 23, 2021). The group also argued that concerns about state court bias were amplified in this case. American Petroleum Institute , No. 21-01752 (8th Cir.).
and Minnesota Federal Courts Remanded Climate Cases Against Fossil Fuel Industry. Two federal district courts—in Minnesota and the District of Columbia—granted motions to remand cases brought by plaintiffs against the fossil fuel industry. Minnesota v. Chevron USA Inc. , 21-15318 (9th Cir. American Petroleum Institute , No.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content