This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
a NorthDakota law firm, of intent to levy on Boechler’s property to satisfy a tax penalty. According to the brief, Castillo did not know (despite diligent efforts to find out) that the IRS was incorrectly assessing her for tax on the earnings of a business she had long since sold. The case, Boechler v.
The dispute arose after the Internal Revenue Service assessed a $19,250 penalty and issued a notice of intent to levy to a small NorthDakota law firm for failing to file employee tax withholding forms. Partly because of the circuit split and partly because of the statute’s lack of clarity, this could be a close case.
NorthDakota and Second Coal Company Asked for Review of D.C. The June certiorari petitions were filed by a coal mining company and by NorthDakota. Both NorthDakota and the coal mining company asked the Court to review the question of the scope of EPA’s regulatory authority under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.
The federal district court for the District of NorthDakota dismissed without prejudice a lawsuit brought by an oil and gas exploration and production company in February 2021 to compel BLM to act on applications for permit to drill (APDs) submitted in 2020 for oil and gas leases in NorthDakota.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content