Day on Torts

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Under the discovery rule, the limitations period will begin to run when “(1) the plaintiff suffers an ‘actual injury’ as a result of the defendant’s allegedly wrongful conduct, and (2) the plaintiff knew or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that its injury was caused by the defendant’s alleged wrongful conduct.”

Legal 59

Legal Legal Tort Statute 59

Day on Torts

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

For HCLA claims, the discovery rule means that a “cause of action accrues when one discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, both (1) that he or she has been injured by wrongful or tortious conduct and (2) the identity of the person or persons whose wrongful conduct caused the injury.”

Statute 59

Statute Tort Cause of Action Diligence 59

Day on Torts

DECEMBER 5, 2022

Where there was material evidence to show that plaintiff met her required due diligence, the jury verdict for plaintiff on her intentional misrepresentation and fraud claim was affirmed. While defendant asserted that there was insufficient evidence to show that plaintiff did her due diligence, the Court disagreed.

Compensatory Damages 59

Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages Tort Diligence 59

Day on Torts

MAY 18, 2022

The tort claims in this case were subject to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to injuries to real property, and the Court of Appeals agreed that this limitations period would not be tolled by the discovery rule under the facts here. internal citation and quotations omitted).

Tort 59

Tort Statute Diligence Contract 59

Day on Torts

FEBRUARY 3, 2022

of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure requires a trial court to “state the legal grounds upon which the court denies or grants the motion, and to include such statement in the order reflecting the trial court’s ruling.” Because the trial court did not give sufficient reasons for its decision, summary judgment was vacated on appeal.

Statute 59

Statute Tort Court Diligence 59

Day on Torts

MARCH 30, 2021

Where the other driver in a car accident case died before suit was filed and the plaintiff failed to “timely file his tort action against the personal representative within the applicable statute of limitations,” summary judgment for the personal representative was affirmed. Luethke , No. E2020-00317-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.

Statute 59

Statute Cause of Action Diligence Court Rules 59

Day on Torts

AUGUST 9, 2021

Defendant implied in his brief that a check could not be considered “tangible personal property,” but the Court quickly pointed out that “conversion of checks is actionable” in Tennessee, as “checks designate specific amounts of money for use for specific purposes.” internal citations omitted). Code Ann. § 47-3-118(g). “In

Divorce 59

Divorce Cause of Action Statute Diligence 59