This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
468 (1852): “When carriers undertake to convey persons by the powerful but dangerous agency of steam, public policy and safety require that they be held to the greatest possible care and diligence. ” This personal injury was, of course, to a pedestrian but would certainly constitute a “gross” tort. 33, 164 S.E.
Lastly, the court denied review in a case challenging a prestigious Virginia magnet high school’s admissions policy , which while facially neutral had the effect of reducing the admission of Asian American students from 73% to 54% for the class of 2025. We should know more soon. Tune in next week when I’m proven wrong. Until next time!
Virginia Federal Court Said Challenge to NEPA Regulations Was Not Justiciable. Wild Virginia v. The MPF brought a tort case against de Rezende for causing the deforestation of 2,488.56 WildEarth Guardians v. Steele , No. 9:19-cv-00056 (D. June 24, 2021). Council on Environmental Quality , No. 3:20-cv-00045 (W.D. June 21, 2021).
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) requested that the federal district court for the Western District of Virginia remand, without vacatur, CEQ’s 2020 amendments to the regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Wild Virginia v. Council on Environmental Quality , No. 3:20-cv-00045 (W.D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content