District of Columbia Immigration Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 17, 2024
Natural Resources Defense Council that courts should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. The question in this challenge to the rule, he said should focus on what the best reading of the statute is.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 19, 2024
The solicitor general now seeks review , supported by the District of Columbia and 20 states , which have filed a friend-of-the-court brief. Certain statutes permit the payment of “a reasonable attorney’s fee” to “the prevailing party” in litigation: 42 U.S.C. Next up is Lackey v. Amina Bouarfa, a U.S. citizen children.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JURIST
MARCH 16, 2025
The statute grants the president broad authority to round up and deport citizens of enemy countries in times of war or amid an invasion or hostile incursion. During that window, immigration officials are prohibited from transferring or deporting Venezuelans covered under the lawsuit on the grounds of the AEA.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 26, 2022
Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. Early life and career. A native of southern California, Kruger is the daughter of two physicians. Kruger went from the D.C.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
To the contrary, in the year it was ratified (1868), thirty of thirty-seven states explicitly criminalized abortion by statute.” According to the group, the court wrongly concluded in Roe that the 19th-century statutes had been enacted to protect women from dangerous operations, rather than to protect fetuses.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
Circuit to hold the cases in abeyance was to allow the federal district for the District of Columbia to resolve cases challenging NHTSA’s action that raise similar legal issues. The district court scheduled a hearing for April 16, 2020 to consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer those cases.
JURIST
DECEMBER 19, 2022
The US Supreme Court Monday stayed an order from the US District Court for the District of Columbia blocking Title 42, a health policy used to deny migrants and asylum-seekers at the US border. The plaintiffs argue that Title 42 does not authorize deportation.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content