Remove District of Columbia Remove Laws Remove Malfeasance
article thumbnail

Federal judge holds Trump’s firing of labor dispute board head unlawful

JURIST

The US District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday held that President Donald Trumps unprecedented removal of the Chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), Susan Tsui Grundmann, was unlawful. Thank you for your service.”

article thumbnail

Watchdog agency head tells justices to stay out of firing dispute

SCOTUSBlog

Under the 1978 federal law creating the Office of Special Counsel , Dellinger could be removed from his position only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the governments appeal, holding that the appeals court lacked the authority to consider it.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trump renews request for justices to allow firing of OSC head

SCOTUSBlog

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Under the law that established the agency, the head of the office can only be removed by the president for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. After he was fired in a Feb.

article thumbnail

US judge blocks Trump from firing democratic chair of federal employee appeals board

JURIST

A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump from firing the Democratic chair of the US Merit System Protection Board (MSPB). 1202, unless she is earlier removed for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office under that statute.

article thumbnail

Trump asks court to allow firing of watchdog agency official

SCOTUSBlog

Under the federal law creating the Office of Special Counsel, Dellinger could be removed by the president from his job only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. The Trump administrations request goes first to Chief Justice John Roberts, who handles emergency appeals from the District of Columbia.

Court 121
article thumbnail

Injunction Junction And Circuit Splits Too

Above The Law

Plaintiffs, including 19 states and the District of Columbia, argued that the terminations were illegal reductions in force (RIFs) conducted without the required 60-day notice to states, violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). unlawfully. National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v.

Court 74