District of Columbia Legal Technology Assisted Review 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” FEATURED CASE.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The majority responded to this latter point by saying that “[t]he dissent’s view is akin to saying that incurring a debt has legal consequences, but forgiving one does not. Thirteen states, the District of Columbia, and the City of Chicago sought leave to intervene on behalf of the petitioners. A debtor would beg to differ.”).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
The mining company argued that the district court should not have issued the injunction without hearing legal arguments and factual evidence on the appropriate remedy, and without weighing the mandatory factors for a mandatory injunction. Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. Attorney General of Vermont , No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JANUARY 13, 2021
On December 22, 2020, the federal district court for the District of Columbia issued an order pursuant to the All Writs Act temporarily enjoining any ground-disturbing work undertaken pursuant to the anticipated approval by the U.S. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore , No. 19-1189 (U.S.). Friends of the Headwaters v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
The federal district court for the District of Columbia concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider an action challenging President Trump’s Executive Order on “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” because the plaintiffs had failed to establish that they had standing to sue. Arizona Board of Regents , No.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content