JURIST
MARCH 13, 2025
The US District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday held that President Donald Trumps unprecedented removal of the Chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), Susan Tsui Grundmann, was unlawful. Thank you for your service.”
JURIST
MARCH 27, 2025
Filed in the federal district court for the District of Columbia, the complaint alleges violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and the US Constitution. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro M. ” Current FTC Chairman Andrew N.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 18, 2025
Under the 1978 federal law creating the Office of Special Counsel , Dellinger could be removed from his position only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the governments appeal, holding that the appeals court lacked the authority to consider it.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 27, 2025
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Under the law that established the agency, the head of the office can only be removed by the president for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. Then-President Joe Biden appointed Dellinger to serve a five-year term as the head of the office in 2024.
JURIST
MARCH 5, 2025
A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump from firing the Democratic chair of the US Merit System Protection Board (MSPB). 1202, unless she is earlier removed for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office under that statute.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 17, 2025
Under the federal law creating the Office of Special Counsel, Dellinger could be removed by the president from his job only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. The Trump administrations request goes first to Chief Justice John Roberts, who handles emergency appeals from the District of Columbia.
Above The Law
MARCH 26, 2025
Plaintiffs, including 19 states and the District of Columbia, argued that the terminations were illegal reductions in force (RIFs) conducted without the required 60-day notice to states, violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Dellinger argued that his termination violated 5 U.S.C.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content