District of Columbia Misdemeanor Statute 
The Crime Report
JULY 12, 2023
The Council of the District of Columbia has approved an emergency public safety bill aimed at addressing the increase in violent crime and homicides in Washington, D.C., The MPD previously interpreted local statute as mandating a no-pursuit policy. Martin Austermuhle reports for DCIst.
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 27, 2022
In district court, Georgia corrections admitted that its policy substantially burdened Smith’s religious exercise, but it argued that various safety and security concerns justified its refusal to allow beards of any greater length. Issues : (1) Whether spending-clause statutes ever give rise to privately enforceable rights under 42 U.S.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Crime Report
SEPTEMBER 21, 2021
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. One of the things I’m very proud of is the work that we did [at John Jay College] through the Misdemeanor Justice Project. Throughout his career, Travis has worked closely with a broad range of luminaries, including New York City Mayor Edward Koch, Sen.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 28, 2024
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Bannon’s motion for release pending appeal. The statute under which he was convicted makes it a misdemeanor to “willfully” fail to respond to a subpoena. “It On June 20 a divided three-judge panel of the U.S.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 2, 2024
The statute is below. After the riot, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine was widely praised when he announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Here is the statute: 13-1202. The quote is clearly a reference to Cheney going to war and how she would feel about it.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
The federal district court for the District of Columbia concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider an action challenging President Trump’s Executive Order on “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” because the plaintiffs had failed to establish that they had standing to sue.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. May 10, 2021).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content