Drafting Legal Research Texas 
LawSites
JUNE 7, 2021
A first-of-its-kind tool introduced last year to automate the drafting of litigation briefs has been named new product of the year for 2021 by the American Association of Law Libraries. CARA has since spawned a generation of similar products from other legal research companies. Casetext says it can cut brief-writing time by 76%.
Patently O
JANUARY 4, 2024
The role of attribution is also receiving increasing focus as attorneys begin to rely more heavily on AI outputs for their legal documents. The case thus raises questions about the extent to which legal pleadings and motions, as petitions to the government for redress, are protected speech. In American Institute of Physics v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
OCTOBER 4, 2021
At the Association of Legal Administrators annual conference today in Austin, Texas, NetDocuments is unveiling a powerful knowledge management product to automatically add legal research intelligence to litigation documents, through a partnership with LexisNexis.
MyCase
APRIL 24, 2024
According to the Legal Industry Report 2024 , nearly one-quarter (24%) of law firms have adopted legal-specific generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools. Survey respondents confirmed they use GAI to streamline firm processes, from drafting marketing content to finding specific statutes. Drafting marketing content.
LawSites
DECEMBER 4, 2023
We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting.
Patently O
MARCH 17, 2022
We find that while overall mandamus is rarely granted by the Federal Circuit, in a key area–petitions involving venue arising from Texas–that is not the case. It’ll also ensure that legal research databases contain these orders going forward. Our finding validates a smaller sample observation that Chin et.
MyCase
MAY 10, 2024
In response to this instance and other generative AI mishaps , a federal judge in the Northern District of Texas issued a standing order requiring anyone appearing before the court to either “attest that no portion of any filing will be drafted by generative artificial intelligence” or cite all language that was drafted by GAI.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
131 
Let's personalize your content