SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 12, 2023

The court had already held in West Virginia State Board of Education v. She told me to draft a concurrence outlining her own view that Newdow had standing, and that the Pledge passed constitutional muster. One of the highest-profile cases decided during my clerkship with her was Elk Grove Unified School District v.

Government 117

Government Court Legal Legal 117

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 8, 2023

23] The draft rule required them only if they are determined to be “material,” which has led to a considerable amount of confusion. [24] cit [50] See, e.g., West Virginia v. Scope 3 emissions are those from its supply chain, both upstream and downstream. [22] 24] SB 253 does not require materiality. Times , Oct. 12, 2022. [49]

Laws 98

Laws Law School Government Legal 98

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Two briefs supporting the fishing companies – one filed by the Goldwater Institute and another by a group of 27 states, led by West Virginia – pointed to the experience of the states, several of which have either abandoned their own versions of Chevron deference or declined to adopt one in the first place.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 3, 2022

In the latest badly drafted gun law to go before the court, New York has forced a challenge that could result in a major ruling reinforcing individual rights under the Second Amendment. Notably, the court has accepted a variety of other cases that could curtail agency authority, including West Virginia v.

Court 57

Court Litigating Litigation Laws 57

JURIST

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in West Virginia v. The Supreme Court agreed to take up the case, while the Biden administration has announced plans to draft its own set of new regulations. Environmental Protection Agency , a major test of the agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Court 129

Court Drafting Statute Litigating 129

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 7, 2022

And in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency , one of the final cases released before this year’s summer recess, the court reversed a lower-court ruling that had interpreted the Clean Air Act to give the EPA expansive powers over carbon emissions.

Laws 111

Laws Stare Decisis Court Statute 111

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

The case, West Virginia v. The Supreme Court then granted a request by Republican-led states and coal companies to review that ruling; meanwhile, the Biden administration EPA has indicated that it will not reinstate the Clean Power Plan and is instead drafting its own rules on greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants.

Court 109

Court Drafting Statute Lawyer 109

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 27, 2022

The dispute at the center of West Virginia v. Two coal-mining companies and 20 Republican-led states, including West Virginia and North Dakota, asked the Supreme Court to review the D.C. And depending on exactly how the justices rule, their decision could limit the power of federal agencies more broadly. Circuit’s ruling.

Court 101

Court Court Rules Government Drafting 101

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

The plan was rolled out via a handful of press releases , a fact sheet , and two memos — without the standard rulemaking procedure that includes providing notice of a draft rule and giving affected individuals the opportunity to comment on it. In West Virginia v.

Education 108

Education Court Statute Legal 108