This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The French parliament unanimously adopted Thursday a proposition by the Commission of Cultural Affairs and Education to create a new inquiry commission on the sexual violence committed against minors in the film, entertainment and fashion industry.
Judge Thomas Parker, a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Friday ruled that Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA) is unconstitutional. The statute criminalizes performances on public land or in a location in which the performance “could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.”
Desmond from interfering with the Blount County Pride Festival under Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA). The AEA bans “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest” in public. The Blount County Pride Festival was held on Saturday as planned.
One ground was a law known as the “ federal officer removal statute ,” which allows the removal to federal court of lawsuits filed in state court against “any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office.”
Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The general federal jurisdiction statute ( 28 U.S.C. Share Monday’s arguments in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission v.
To create the compact, each state passed statutes and, as New York’s bill of complaint indicates is a constitutional requirement for interstate compacts, Congress consented as well. However, in 2018, New Jersey passed a statute to withdraw from the compact, and on Dec. Texas Entertainment Association, Inc. However, the U.S.
After the New York County Supreme Court issued an injunction which prohibited Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. Garden Entertainment Corp. MSG) from denying legitimate ticket-holders access to its venue when attending a theatrical performance or concert, MSG appealed. ” Did the AD1 split the ticket there? .”
After the New York County Supreme Court issued an injunction which prohibited Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. Garden Entertainment Corp. MSG) from denying legitimate ticket-holders access to its venue when attending a theatrical performance or concert, the latter appealed. ” Did the AD1 split the ticket there? .”
New York’s post mortem right-of-publicity statute recently came into effect. Because the statute addressed privacy concerns that dissipated at death, such rights did not extend post mortem. News, public affairs, and sports programs are also exempt from the statute. written consent” can sue for an injunction and damages.
The board pitches the dispute as just another in a long line of cases skeptically reviewing claims that federal statutes abrogate the sovereign immunity of state governments. Those cases establish one of the clear-statement rules that the Supreme Court has adopted so readily the last few decades.
” The court cannot entertain an application for review of its judgment filed by an applicant who was not a party to the proceedings as this goes to the root of the matter and sanctity of the already determined suit which was contested by the parties.
The vagueness problems could be reduced by limiting the scope to adult entertainment settings. Section 2 of the Statute makes it “an offense for a person to perform adult cabaret entertainment,” either “(A) On public property; or (B) in a location where the adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.”
She asked Fletcher, “[E]xactly how [do] you want us to rewrite the statute?” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also inquired how the court should deal with Congress’s earlier deletion of “certain words that I now hear you wanting us to read back into this statute.”
United States , which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. “I I won’t be as entertaining,” Sotomayor says before delivering a straightforward summary of the case. And she points out that VIP Products has further issues it can press as the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Although it required invention in name, it was really just becoming a replacement to monopolies barred by the Statute of Monopolies (1624). . The exclusive privileges authorized by that statute and our own are but modifications of the monopolies and grants by which the people of every quarter of the globe have, for ages, been oppressed.
Sony Music Entertainment. Serova is expected to address: (1) Do representations a seller made about a creative product on the product packaging and in advertisements during an ongoing controversy constitute speech in connection with an issue of public interest within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civ. & Prof.
through crawls of emergency information carried during entertainment programs – see our article here ) were also part of FCC rules adopted pursuant to the CVAA. Using a TV station’s secondary audio channels (“SAP channels”) to convey emergency information conveyed visually during non-news programs (e.g.
The defendants moved to dismiss Mr. Elden’s complaint, arguing that it was barred by the applicable 10-year statute of limitations for such claims. The Ninth Circuit continued by recognizing that section 2255(b) contained the pertinent statute of limitation for such claims. Elden’s claims were timely.
In her opinion, Justice Sotomayor explained that administrative review schemes commonly require parties to give the agency an opportunity to address an issue before seeking judicial review of that question, noting that such administrative issue-exhaustion requirements are typically creatures of statute or regulation. Citing Sims v.
It also sought punitive damages, injunctive relief, and a declaratory judgment that defendants had violated certain statutes. Plaintiff’s complaint sought compensatory damages for defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. internal citation omitted). internal citations omitted).
The question is whether a 1987 federal statute subjects certain Indian tribes in Texas to that state’s entire body of gambling law. In this case, it is two forms of bingo at the Pueblo tribe’s Speaking Rock Entertainment Center near El Paso, Texas, that is primarily at issue. The first case, Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v.
Applications of AI in law AI applications in law are wide-ranging and can include: Legal research and analysis AI-powered platforms can quickly scan and analyze large volumes of legal documents, statutes, case law, and regulations to provide relevant information and insights to lawyers and judges.
the Supreme Court today interprets a statute so as to make it more difficult for a juvenile court to terminate a parental relationship when reunification of the child with the parent is not an option. In In re Caden C. , ” The opinion does not explain why it is being issued more than 16 months after the close of briefing.
Under Chevron , courts must defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, even if they are inclined to rule another way. The Court’s Chevron decision established a bedrock principle of administrative law. The cases before the Court, Relentless, Inc.
Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. In Wilkins v. United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the Court.
Lang Van is a California corporation that produces and distributes Vietnamese music and entertainment, owning the copyrights to thousands of songs and programs. District Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant with regard to a copyright infringement suit.
3d 1040, 1040.) And in 2015, the Ninth Circuit asked for Supreme Court aid because it found “no controlling precedent” about how to interpret an “ambiguous” California statute. ( Davis v. ” ( Fantasyland Video, Inc. County of San Diego (9th Cir. 2007) 496 F.3d Devanlay Retail Group, Inc. 2015) 785 F.3d
The noncitizens appearing before them face a host of daunting challenges — language barriers, financial strain, lack of legal assistance, and years-long delays — before they can entertain any hope of resolving their immigration status. Against this rather bleak backdrop comes the low-profile case of Santos-Zacaria v.
In addition to the traditional protections afforded under the Lanham Act, as well as those under state and common law, some of the Olympic trademarks are protected by a special statute, designed in order to allow the USOC exclusive rights to control all commercial use of USOC trademarks, imagery and/or terminology in the United States.
Sony Music Entertainment : (1) Do representations a seller made about a creative product on the product packaging and in advertisements during an ongoing controversy constitute speech in connection with an issue of public interest within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civ. Proc., § 425.16)? (2) & Prof.
the venue should not be a luxury resort, high-end restaurant, or other entertainment, sporting, or recreational venue). If held in a third-party venue, the venue “should not be extravagant or the main attraction of the event” (e.g.,
California’s right of publicity statute is Civil Code Section 3344, and it prohibits the use of another’s name, voice, photograph, or likeness on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling such products, merchandise, or goods without such person’s prior consent. The first was Midler v.
As prescribed by statute, a party objecting to the Commission proceedings makes its claims first within the Commission itself, and then (if needed) in a federal court of appeals. According to the Court, “[t]he ordinary statutory review scheme does not preclude a district court from entertaining these extraordinary claims.”
The court wants a Court of Appeal opinion on the constitutionality of a state statute barring public employers from discouraging union membership. He argued that the statute criminalizing his conduct violates the Second Amendment. Clark about the legislation’s application. Lopez already has its own grant-and-hold.
In March of this year, the court heard argument in another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. The court granted review in March 2023. More about the case here. Vigilant Insurance Co. with an opinion expected by June 3. More about the case here. Horvitz & Levy is Supreme Court counsel for State Farm.
Courts guard rather jealously their jurisdiction and even where there is an ouster of that jurisdiction by Statute It should be by clear and unequivocal words, If that is so, as indeed It is, how much less can parties by their private acts remove the jurisdiction properly and legally vested In our courts? Mandatory statutes.
California – The California statute references the GHG Protocol – with an added, somewhat ambiguous reference to “an alternative standard, if one is adopted after 2033”. and Sony Music Entertainment Inc.), (b) active in California or New York, or (c) U.S. The California statute should cover 5,000 U.S. headquartered.
The question put to the ICJ must be a legal question within the meaning of the Statute of the Court and the UN Charter as opposed to a political question. It is worth noting that the ICJ has never, in the exercise of this power, declined to respond to a request for an advisory opinion from the UNGA.
Talking about the jurisdiction of the Courts, the Court below, by virtue of Section 272 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) has jurisdiction to entertain cases such as recovery of debts, as in the instant case on appeal. 6] First, the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U.
has not been a friend of arbitration,” the dissent said, “By again putting arbitration on the chopping block, this statute invites a seventh reprimand from the Supreme Court of the United States.” ” In another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. Coastal Commission jurisdiction.
Lexington Insurance Company is a grant-and-hold for Another Planet Entertainment v. ” The Probate Code statutes concern compensation for personal representatives of estates and for the representatives’ attorneys. Vigilant Insurance Co. ” (Links added.) Criminal case grant-and-holds.
The statute defines “information content provider” as “any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.” Dirty World Entertainment. 47 U.S.C. § A gossip blog, The Dirty, appealed the decision of U.S.
Most lawyers spend far more time behind a desk, poring over statutes, drafting briefs, and consulting with colleagues. You could be working in environmental advocacy, helping your community, or you could be in entertainment law, protecting artists rights. Thats just one slice of the lawyers universe. Sound glamorous?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content