Remove Entertainment Remove Statute Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Chancery court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over defamation tort claims.

Day on Torts

Where the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint was his tort claim for defamation seeking unliquidated damages, the chancery court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and the case should have been transferred to circuit court. In Lowery v. Redmond , No. W2021-00611-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Supreme Court adds arbitration, Coastal Commission cases to its docket

At the Lectern

Two included separate explanatory statements: Three votes for review, and a dissenting statement, in juvenile coerced plea case Two votes for review, and a dissenting statement, in youth-offender LWOP no-parole case A third case concerned domestic violence torts. ” In another COVID insurance case, Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v.

Court 49
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Australia High Court Delivers Major Blow to Free Speech In Defamation Ruling

JonathanTurley

The Supreme Court ruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. Dirty World Entertainment. Specifically, § 230 precludes courts from entertaining claims that would place a computer service provider in a publisher’s role. 47 U.S.C. § America Online, Inc.,

Tort 42
article thumbnail

Legit or Lawsuit – Fake Drake AI Song

The IP Law Blog

California’s right of publicity statute is Civil Code Section 3344, and it prohibits the use of another’s name, voice, photograph, or likeness on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling such products, merchandise, or goods without such person’s prior consent. The first was Midler v. Frito Lay.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Sovereign immunity, legislative censure and another habeas question

SCOTUSBlog

United States that the Federal Tort Claims Act, through which Congress generally waived the federal government’s sovereign immunity from tort liability, does not extend to service-members’ injuries that “arise out of or are in the course of activity incident” to a person’s active duty service in the military. United States , 20-559.

Tort 107