Remove Felony Remove Government Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Court limits definition of “violent felony” in federal gun-possession penalty

SCOTUSBlog

Share A fractured Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the scope of a key phrase in the Armed Career Criminal Act, ruling that crimes involving recklessness do not count as “violent felonies” for the purpose of triggering a key sentencing enhancement. Justice Clarence Thomas did not join Kagan’s opinion but concurred in the result.

Felony 123
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules First Amendment retaliatory arrest claims permissible despite probable cause

JURIST

The case concerns a Texas councilwoman who argues that she was arrested in retaliation for her speech critical of a city government official. After two heated council meetings, it was alleged that Gonzales had placed the petition—with over 300 signatures—in her binder, violating a Texas anti-tampering statute.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court hears arguments in firearms possession cases

JURIST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard oral arguments in two cases involving one of its own precedents regarding felony firearms possession. The issues in both cases involves the federal law that prohibits felons from possessing firearms, 18 USC §922(g). Two years ago in Rehaif v.

Court 203
article thumbnail

North Carolina man sentenced for threatening House Speaker Pelosi after US Capitol riot

JURIST

The US District Court for the District of Columbia Tuesday sentenced a North Carolina man to 28 months in prison after he pleaded guilty to a federal felony charge regarding a threat he made against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The trial followed an FBI investigation and prosecution by the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Colombia.

Felony 209
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court limits new trials for felons in possession of firearm

JURIST

Under the 2019 decision in Rehaif , the government had to prove both that a defendant knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to a category of persons prohibited from possessing firearms in order to convict that defendant under the statute. His conviction was vacated, and the government appealed.

Court 188
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Considers Reach of Aggravated Identity Theft Statute

The Crime Report

The federal aggravated identity theft statute applies to anyone who “knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person” in relation to certain felonies, Daniel Harawa reports for SCOTUSBlog. In Dubin v.

Statute 75
article thumbnail

In habeas case, the liberal justices try to untangle a complex statute

SCOTUSBlog

Hendrix , a case that exemplifies the Gordian knot that is the federal habeas corpus statute. United States that Section 922(g) requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Share On Tuesday, the court heard argument in Jones v.

Statute 101