July 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The majority responded to this latter point by saying that “[t]he dissent’s view is akin to saying that incurring a debt has legal consequences, but forgiving one does not. Washington Appellate Court Said Climate Goals in County’s Shoreline Master Program Were Not Unconstitutionally Vague. A debtor would beg to differ.”).
Let's personalize your content