This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court, in a split decision, issued a brief statement on Thursday refusing to reinstate a Florida law that targets drag shows. Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared to disagree with the grounds upon which the state of Florida appealed the lower court’s ruling. ” The case at issue , Griffen v. .”
While the standard statute of limitations for personal injury cases in Florida is four years, certain factors can extend the deadline or effectively pause the timer.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday sent a pair of challenges to laws in Texas and Florida that would regulate how large social media companies control content posted on their sites back to the lower courts for another look. Texas and Florida passed the laws at the center of the two cases in the wake of Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S.
Share A divided Supreme Court on Thursday denied Florida’s request to allow it to temporarily enforce a law that makes it a misdemeanor to allow children at drag performances. The brief unsigned order means that the state cannot apply the law anywhere in the state while a Florida restaurant’s challenge to the law continues.
The Georgia Supreme Court this week issued a decision holding that the streaming of pre-1972 sound recordings by iHeart Media does not violate the state’s criminal statutes against the “transfer” of recorded sounds without the permission of the owner of the master recording.
Some language was included as an amendment, but only time will tell if that language holds up to litigation of the issue. Courts have repeatedly reiterated that the legislative purpose of the homestead exemption statutes is to allow the family to prevent judgment creditors from taking the family home.(ii)
The crux of the case turned on the meaning of the phrase, “exclusive ownership,” which the California legislature used in California’s copyright statute in 1872. They filed similar suits in Florida and New York contending that those states’ copyright laws required a similar result. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. ,
Gambling on tribal lands first came to prominence with a Seminole casino in Florida in the late 1970s. The Pueblo and the Alabama-Coushatta have been in more or less constant litigation with Texas ever since, for more than a quarter of a century. The success of that facility led to proliferation of the business model.
But, the statute as written creates a slightly different test — asking what “reasonably could have raised during that inter partes review.” The statute charges the USPTO Director the role of instituting the IPR, although that duty had been delegated tot he PTAB. Christa Laser and her 2018 Florida Law Review article.
In a decision this week, the Florida Supreme Court rejected claims by Flo & Eddie (of the 1960s band the Turtles) that there was a common law public performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings in the state of Florida (the opinion is available here ). Could California decide differently?
A federal judge permanently dismissed a proposed class action against Costco over its "session replay" software that tracks web users' activity amid what he called an "outbreak of litigation" from litigants who have "seized on a novel reading of Florida's decades-old wiretapping statute."
The plaintiff was an American cruise ship passenger, Paul Turner, who brought a class action in federal district court in Florida alleging that the cruise line’s “negligence contributed to an outbreak of COVID-19 aboard the Costa Luminosa during his transatlantic voyage beginning on March 5, 2020.”. The case was Turner v. public policy.
At $150,000, Arizona already has one of the higher homestead exemptions, according to Asset Protection Planners, though eight states including Texas and Florida offer unlimited protection. That would undermine “the protection a debtor has under the current homestead• exemption statute,” Drain wrote in a commentary.
Luis Sanchez is a part-owner of a small business in Florida selling electronics to Latin American customers. A federal district court in Florida tossed their paperwork, given the requirement in the federal drug statute that third-party petitions to reclaim seized assets “be signed by the Petitioner under penalty of perjury.”
Two pending petitions raise the question of the constitutionality of state statutes providing that corporations are deemed to have consented to “general” personal jurisdiction by virtue of having registered to do business in a state. was filed by a plaintiff seeking to enforce a similar registration statute. Returning Relists.
The Furman litigation was the culmination of a campaign conducted by a group of lawyers under the auspices of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Some states, such as Louisiana and North Carolina, enacted mandatory death penalty statutes, eliminating discretion entirely from the death penalty system. The Furman Framework.
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled that his action was untimely because more than two years – the applicable statute of limitations – had run since the state trial court in 2014 denied his request for DNA testing. Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. Florida , 21-53. That’s all for this week.
There are state courts and federal courts, state statutes and federal statutes, state common law and federal common law. A clause is contrary to public policy when a statute or a judicial decision declares that enforcement is inconsistent with the policy of the state. The United States legal system is immensely complex.
United States , holding that a conviction under the federal statute penalizing felons in possession of a firearm requires not only the defendant’s knowledge that he possessed a gun, but also that he knew he had the legal status of a convicted felon. 922(g) , the federal felon-in-possession statute. Greer fled down the stairwell.
Florida , 21-53 , which the court denied review on after a whopping 10 relists. Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim seeking DNA testing of crime-scene evidence begins to run at the end of state-court litigation denying DNA testing, including any appeals (as the U.S. rescheduled before the Dec.
1988), which invalidated under dormant commerce clause doctrine an Ohio law providing that the state’s statute of limitation would not run against corporations that were not present in the state and had not designated an agent for service of process. Florida , 21-53. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc. relisted after the Dec. 3 conference).
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. In Florida, a woman has sued for defamation, harassment and emotional distress after her neighbor set up decorations that included an insane asylum sign that pointed to her yard and a fake tombstone with an inscription she viewed as a reference to her single status. Source: CBS.
FDA, ruled that limiting Orphan Drug Exclusivity to the indication, rather than the condition designated, is inconsistent with the plain language of the statute. But like in the Depomed litigation, FDA’s reading of the Orphan Drug Act went too far, and, like the Depomed litigation, it will take an act of Congress to overturn this decision.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. In Florida, a woman has sued for defamation, harassment and emotional distress after her neighbor set up decorations that included an insane asylum sign that pointed to her yard and a fake tombstone with an inscription she viewed as a reference to her single status. Source: CBS.
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. As Exhibit B, I give you the Florida Supreme Court’s Oct.
In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” Florida , 21-53. The case has already been rescheduled three times, clearly indicating it’s on at least one of the justices’ radar. Next up is Texas v. relisted after the Oct.
After the yacht ran aground in Florida and sustained significant damage, Raiders filed a claim. Because the claims were based on Pennsylvania statutes, it argued, they were barred by the choice-of-law clause. This post is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog ] Raiders opposed this motion.
Through litigation, certain copyright holders (including, most notably, Flo and Eddie of the 1960’s band The Turtles) have been seeking compensation from digital and analog music services for the public performance of pre-1972 sound recordings. But that law stops short of full Federalization of pre-1972 sound recordings.
In yet another decision based on statutory interpretation, an appellate court has decided that FDA’s interpretation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) is contrary to the plain text of the statute. It may lead to new litigation or call into question previous FDA awards of orphan drug exclusivity.
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. As Exhibit B, I give you the Florida Supreme Court’s Oct.
Florida education officials and civil rights attorneys reached a settlement on Monday over the state law dubbed “Don’t Say Gay.” ” The parties came to an agreement after two years of litigation and an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
involves the trigger for the statute of limitations in cases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act – also known as “Superfund” – for the clean-up of sites contaminated with hazardous pollutants. The case will likely be argued sometime in the fall. The first case, Georgia-Pacific v.
From her home in Florida, Laufer – who has multiple sclerosis and uses a wheelchair or a cane to move around – combs the internet to look for hotels whose websites do not provide information about the accessibility of the hotel’s facilities. Share Deborah Laufer is a self-appointed civil rights tester.
In Florida, U.S. In the course of the litigation, the Justice Department conceded that The United States concedes that “[t]here is no evidence of firearms being prohibited at post offices, specifically, or of postal workers being prohibited from carrying them, at the time of the founding.” 18 U.S.C. § 18 U.S.C. §
Corpus linguistics is a tool used to identify the original public meaning of words – no small thing when the outcome of a case often hinges on the meaning of a single word in a statute or the Constitution. These examples underscore corpus linguistics’ utility in ascertaining the meaning of statutes. Woodson , 960 F.3d 3d 852 (6th Cir.
Stanley was a firefighter in Sanford, Florida, until she was forced by Parkinson’s Disease to take disability retirement. But its suit named Dewberry Group, not the affiliates, as a defendant, and the parties litigated only the liability of Dewberry Group itself. Florida and Moore v. In Stanley v. rescheduled before the Mar.
Coverage of federal fraud statutes Porat v. The district court held that the allegations were inadequate under the heightened pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act , which Congress adopted to curb perceived abuses of securities litigation. Florida and Moore v. United States and Kousisis v.
That brings us to our next issue, raised by a large group of Florida criminal cases that the court has had kicking around since November. Ordinarily, under the so-called “American Rule,” each litigant pays its own attorney’s fees, whether it wins or loses. Bouarfa sued.
Johns County, Florida. The court reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. On the Title IX issue, the court held that the statute allows schools to provide separate bathrooms on the basis of biological sex. Johns County, Florida. School Board of St. School Board of St.
It is a curious call for a governor to make after he ran ads in Florida calling on people to “join us in California.” California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) chimed in, declaring the flight from Florida might be “ State-sanctioned kidnapping.” Gavin Newsom (D., for kidnapping charges against Gov.
See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Source: CBS In Florida, a woman has sued for defamation, harassment and emotional distress after her neighbor set up decorations that included an insane asylum sign that pointed to her yard and a fake tombstone with an inscription she viewed as a reference to her single status.
Avenatti came to the Supreme Court earlier this year, asking the justices to decide whether one of the statutes under which he was convicted – barring fraud that deprives someone else of “the intangible right of honest services” – is so vague that it is unconstitutional. A Florida state court upheld Cunningham’s conviction.
Supreme Court invalidated capital punishment statutes in several states in Furman v. Florida (14 percent), and Texas (8 percent) came next. And in another key metric suggesting how much death penalty litigation has altered the landscape, prisoners under sentence of death by the end of 2020 had been on death row for an average of 19.4
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The court also declined to “create a new tort named abusive litigation.” and non-U.S. National Review, Inc. ,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content