This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Amnesty International’s investigation focused on four Israeli attacks in Beirut between October 3 and 9, 2024, which killed 19 healthcare workers, wounded 11 more, and destroyed multiple ambulances and two medical facilities. It serves as the primary healthcare provider in areas that Israel repeatedly attacked.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) called on the new Lebanese government to adopt a human rights oriented agenda that promotes the rule of law, transparency and accountability on Thursday. The organization urged the government to implement legal reforms across various sectors to meet the needs of the people and build a brighter future for the country.
The Court held in favor of the appellant, David Dubin, who was convicted of healthcare fraud for overbilling Medicaid for services provided to a patient. The government also applied a sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. The opinion provides analogies including “a lawyer who rounds up her hours from 2.9
Kirschenbaum — In a recent decision, the Second Circuit upheld the HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG)’s position that Pfizer’s proposed copay assistance program for its high-cost heart treatment would violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). The Second Circuit’s Interpretation of the Anti-Kickback Statute. Pfizer, Inc.
Today, Tuesday March 1, the local government building in the city of Kharkiv was hit by a cruise missile killing ten people and wounding many more. According to the Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, at least 352 civilians, including 14 children were killed. Ukraine has not yet become a State Party to the Rome Statute of the ICC.
Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. Facts of the Case Petitioner David Dubin was convicted of healthcare fraud under 18 U.S.C. The crux of the healthcare fraud was a misrepresentation about the qualifications of petitioner’s employee,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have aggressively pursued antikickback cases in the healthcare industry. The Alert described several factors that could potentially violate the antikickback statute.
The decision will likely have far-reaching effects across the country, from environmental regulation to healthcare costs. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable.
Kirschenbaum — In 2017, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a final rule to significantly decrease the rate the government will reimburse 340B hospitals in 2018 for outpatient prescription drugs from average sales price (“ASP”) plus 6% to ASP minus 22.5%. The statute sets this “average price” as ASP plus 6%.
The Realtor argued that the governmenthealthcare programs require that drugs not be “adulterated,” which means that Grifols’ manufacturing processes must comply with all applicable GMPs. 3729) quit tam suit, alleging that Grifols USA, Grifols Biologicals, Grifols, S.A.,
Gaulkin — We previously blogged about Pfizer’s copay assistance lawsuit, which sought to challenge HHS’s interpretation of the Federal health care program anti-kickback statute (AKS) and position that the company’s proposed copay assistance program would violate the AKS. By Sophia R. Background.
Interpreting federal statutes, regulations, and an administrative manual, the court adopts “[a] narrower definition of unallowable advertising,” one that makes a “distinction between advertising that educates potential beneficiaries about needed care and advertising designed to generate revenue.”
In three of the past four terms, the Supreme Court has rejected broad readings of white-collar criminal laws urged by the federal government. Issue : Whether a federal court deciding a state-law issue in a bankruptcy case must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules or federal choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs.
Applications of AI in healthcare Artificial intelligence in the healthcare industry has numerous applications that can improve patient care, diagnoses, and overall efficiency in the industry. AI and machine learning: a simple explanation What is artificial intelligence?
Both serve to depict healthcare that is provided virtually and without physical contact with a healthcare provider. A patient explains his or her complaints virtually, often by video conferencing, and the healthcare provider will give a recommendation or diagnosis. There are also informed consent requirements that vary by state.
They argue that the 340B statute had never intended to give contract pharmacies such an outsized role in the program, in part because their proliferation stretched HRSA’s enforcement capacity and resulted in widespread noncompliance. In 2021, HRSA threatened to impose penalties and the drug manufacturers sued to enjoin the agency. & Mfrs.
That changed on October 18, 2021 when the Federal District Court for the District of Hawaii handed down a decision that construed key terms in the statute. Note that EKRA’s reach is broader than the Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies only to “federal healthcare programs” — e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc. 18 U.S.C. §
The FCA, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 – 3733 , is a federal statute enacted in 1863 in response to defense contractor fraud during the Civil War. The FCA provides that any person who knowingly submits, or causes to submit, false claims to the government is liable for three times the government’s damages plus a penalty.
Governors, state cannabis regulators, law enforcement groups and local governments weighed in, as did marijuana advocates and opponents, marijuana industry associations, Members of Congress, federal law enforcement groups, healthcare and human rights groups, unions and trade associations, and private individuals. 21 U.S.C. §
That changed on October 18, 2021 when the Federal District Court for the District of Hawaii handed down a decision that construed key terms in the statute. Note that EKRA’s reach is broader than the Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies only to “federal healthcare programs” — e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc. 18 U.S.C. §
Importantly, “price increase” is not defined in this statute. It appears not to mean a WAC increase, because the term WAC is specifically used in defining the price increase triggers, but not in reference to the manufacturer’s price increase. The Board may then initiate a cost review of any such identified drug product.
San Jose Healthcare System (the Supreme Court granted two separate petitions for review by the plaintiff ( here and here )) found no UCL or CLRA violations. the Fourth District, Division Two, published opinion held a county’s child services department conducted an appropriate initial inquiry required by state statute.
According to the UN, the RSF has been conducting deliberate attacks on civilians and civilian objects since early 2023 when it began conflicting with the Sudanese government forces. These victims have also been exposed to acute hunger and lack of healthcare services. million people.
Lebanon researcher at HRW, Ramzi Kaiss, said, “More and more evidence is emerging that Israeli forces repeatedly failed to protect civilians or adequately distinguish civilians from military targets during its strikes across Lebanon in 2023 and 2024” Kaiss claims the Lebanese government should ensure justice for the victims.
It presents the question whether, in prosecuting a woman accused of smuggling drugs into the United States, the government can introduce expert testimony that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not typically entrust large quantities of drugs to unwitting transporters. United States.
healthcare system. This proposal would substantially increase the likelihood that generic versions of patent-protected drugs will come into the market in a timely fashion, and that multiple versions of generic products will be approved quickly (leading to significant cost savings).
The government will now only be able to prosecute the company for failure to report suspicious prescriptions after October 2018, when the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was amended. US District Court Judge Jerry Pappert limited the liability of opioid distributor Cencora (previously known as Amerisourcebergen) on Monday in the case US v.
Representing the federal government, Kyle Hawkins told the justices that their cases emphasized that rights-creating statutes are atypical. But the any qualified provider provision, he stressed, is a run-of-the-mill spending clause statute, and holding otherwise would invite line-drawing problems.
This decision mandated that any government action impairing this right must pass “strict scrutiny,” which is the highest standard of judicial review. This means the state must show that the law serves a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
The DOJ also said that the law regulates areas that are preempted by federal government authority because of the impact this ban will have on interstate commerce. Attorney General Merrick Garland noted that “the statute includes an unprecedented scheme to, in the Chief Justice’s words, ‘insulate the State from responsibility.'”
The court reasoned that since SB 14 does not violate a constitutionally protected interest, it can be found unconstitutional only if it is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
Michael Vernick, government contracts partner with Akin Gump, discusses various aspects of the False Claims Act, including the potential for increased enforcement activity under the Biden administration, especially actions related to the CARES Act, and how companies and institutions can mitigate whistleblower and compliance related risks.
They ask that the justices require the government to file its opposition brief within 30 days without extension so that the justices could hear the argument at its first sitting in October 2022. government has not disputed is Turkey for jurisdictional purposes. Also on Jan. In contrast, according to Halkbank’s petition, the U.S.
Overall, the justices appeared more receptive to the healthcare worker vaccine mandate. 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community; and (2) whether, under 8 U.S.C.
When the brother was admitted, plaintiff filled out admission paperwork, including an arbitration agreement, as plaintiff had a durable power of attorney for healthcare executed by the brother and naming plaintiff as the attorney-in-fact. internal citation omitted). Code Ann. § internal citation omitted).
Two District Courts enjoined enforcement of the rule, and the Government now asked the Supreme Court to stay those injunctions. According to the majority, the Secretary of Health and Human Services was within his authority in imposing the vaccine mandate on healthcare workers.
In its opposition, the government argues that there is no such disagreement, that it recently issued clarifying regulations obviating the need for Supreme Court review, and that in any event the D.C. Courts of Appeals for the 4th Circuit and the 9th Circuit have reached the same conclusion. But the U.S. relisted after the Jan.
where the Second District, Division Seven, Court of Appeal held that a preemption clause in federal Medicare statutes preempted an action for negligence, elder abuse, and wrongful death against a private Medicare Advantage health care plan insurer and the plan’s health care provider. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Silverscreen Healthcare. It held the “wrongful death claim sounds in professional negligence” and is thus governed by Code of Civil Procedure section 1295 , an arbitration statute in the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Ruiz v. The court granted review in Holland v.
While the Final Order does not necessarily introduce any new red flags, it does appear that DEA is attempting to refine these requirements and impose bright line standards related to “red flags” and the need for documentation, which are not currently defined in the statute or regulations. at 62,341; see Jones Total Healthcare Pharmacy, L.L.C.
Coverage of federal fraud statutes Porat v. The government adds that plenary review and argument are not necessary “[i]n light of the obviousness of the error.” The court held that the jury should decide whether “government funds were involved in the payments.” This week’s relists are a real grab bag of issues.
The Court agreed with the Government that the CMS mandate “falls within the authorities that Congress has conferred upon” the agency. According to Justice Thomas, the Government had not established that any statute empowers it to impose a vaccine mandate.
The government expected the mandate to cover 84 million workers. But in the end, the court posited, other government actors – who are politically accountable – must “weigh such tradeoffs,” rather than the justices. For Gorsuch, the “answer is clear”: the states and Congress.
(relisted after the Jan. 26, May 9, May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) L.W. rescheduled before the Mar. 26 and May 9 conferences; relisted after the May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences) Jane Doe 1 v. Kentucky ex rel.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content