This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Nebraska and Department of Education v. Nebraska today with the statement, “The problem here is the states aren’t the proper plaintiff to bring this suit.” ” The legal merits of the cases turn on the separation of powers between branches of government. In Biden v. After many failed legislative efforts.
Nebraska bring to an end a nearly year-long saga in which Biden attempted to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loans for current and former US college students. Nebraska , Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority. The court’s decisions in Department of Education v. Brown and Biden v. In a 6-3 decision in Biden v.
In Ohio, Nebraska, and Florida, legislation has passed and legalization is pending as state governments plan how to roll out their systems. Current statutes are simply inadequate to address online betting at this scale and has forced officials like James to address the problem themselves.
Representing Tyler, lawyer Christina Martin argued that the county had violated the Constitution’s takings clause, which bars the government from taking private property for public use without adequately compensating the property owners. Katyal insisted that the home-forfeiture scheme was not a “moneymaker for the government.”
Her parents, Angela Rodriguez and Adan Rodriguez, sued Lasting Hope and Benton’s employer, University of Nebraska Medical Center Physicians, but the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the action due to a lack of any legal duty to warn or protect the girlfriend. We have discussed decisions extending Tarasoff. ” Id.
Nebraska and Department of Education v. In their attack on the statutory text, the plaintiffs argue that cancellation constitutes a “breathtaking assertion of power and a matter of great economic and political significance” sufficient to demand a clearer expression of congressional intent than that in the statute. Jonathan D.
The illegal destruction of disciplinary records can make it harder to hold deputies accountable in a court of law, or track problem officers moving from department to department, said Sam Walker, emeritus professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Who governs them? There’s no governing body for (the sheriff).
In 1981, Congress passed a statute requiring that reimbursement rates paid to organizations for managing state Medicaid plans must be “actuarially sound.” The case has already been rescheduled three times, clearly indicating it’s on at least one of the justices’ radar. Next up is Texas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 21-379.
Nebraska , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. The HEROES Act allows the Secretary to ‘waive or modify’” provisions of the student aid laws, “but does not allow the Secretary to rewrite that statute to the extent of canceling $430 billion of student loan principal,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote on behalf of the Court. In Biden v.
A statement from the ICC Prosecutor’s Office made Friday noted that “significant public interest” surrounding present cases encouraged dialogue but warned against individuals threatening to retaliate against any actions of the court, which is prohibited under Article 70 of the Rome Statute , to which the US is not a party.
The federal government joined the case, relying on a federal law that allows it to do so in cases involving equal protection “if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance.” The federal government and the families also point to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. of adults and 1.4%
51] That doctrine only applies to federal regulations, however, not to state statutes, so it does not pose a danger to the two California bills. Gray, Mayer Brown LLP, “SEC’s Climate Risk Disclosure Proposal Likely to Face Legal Challenges,” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, May 10, 2022, [link]. [3]
Carhart struck down a partial-birth abortion law in Nebraska. Biden may magnify those problems by pledging a “whole-of-government response” to the court’s order. However, the range of permissible state action is likely to be decided not by Congress but by the court, based not on a Texas law but on a Mississippi statute.
The Republican-led “anti-ESG” (environmental, social, governance) movement over the last two years has largely been a legislative effort, comprised primarily of state-level bills that attempt to halt the consideration of climate risk and other commonplace factors in investment decisions connected with government funds, contracts, and pensions.
Louisiana filed suit in the US District Court for its Western District, leading a cohort comprising Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.
Nebraska and was filed by six states with Republican attorneys general. The loan-forgiveness program, Nebraska Solicitor General James Campbell told the justices, “threatens to cut MOHELA’s” funding by nearly 40%. Both DeVos and the Biden plan relied on the HEROES Act, a law passed after the Sept.
Agency rulemaking across the federal government – from fiduciary duties and antitrust enforcement , to telecommunications and the authority of the FDA , to immigration policy and nuclear waste storage, among many other issues – has been challenged as unlawful under the principles of the MQD. As Justice Kagan points out in her Biden v.
By contrast, the government emphasizes, because the harms to the public from blocking enforcement of the mandate “would be enormous,” the court should at the very least leave the mask-or-test requirement in place even if it puts the vaccine requirement on hold.
In this case, contractors not getting paid by the US government for work they already performed, on contracts and appropriations already blessed by Congress and the executive branch, could do real damage. The one where the government follows the law and pays its bills to contractors who already did the work? But which status quo?
Nebraska , the Court relied on the MQD to determine that the Biden Administration could not forgive $430 billion of federal student loan debt under a 2003 Act that had not been the basis for such a sweeping program before. Two recent cases of note have affirmed the use of the MQD. In the Supreme Court’s recent decision Biden v.
More than 500 law firms and 300 retired judges asked for leave to file two amicus briefs condemning Trumps order stripping security clearances from and severing government ties with the major law firm, which previously did work for Democrats. Assistant Counsel for Discipline/Legal Ethics Investigator, State of Nebraska Lincoln.
Nebraska and Department of Education v. Instead, the CDC has imposed a nationwide moratorium on evictions in reliance on a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination. It strains credulity to believe that this statute grants the CDC the sweeping authority that it asserts.”
Government research and independent assessments (see, e.g., here and here ) contradict President Trumps findings about insufficient energy supply and grid unreliability. As a general matter, the President derives emergency powers from the Constitution and statutes.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content